180 likes | 731 Views
The Preference Matrix As A Course Design Tool. John Paxton Montana State University Universit ät Leipzig Koli Calling Saturday, November 11, 2006. Outline. Introduction Application Evaluation Discussion. I. Introduction. Preference Matrix.
E N D
The Preference Matrix As A Course Design Tool John Paxton Montana State University Universität Leipzig Koli Calling Saturday, November 11, 2006
Outline • Introduction • Application • Evaluation • Discussion
Preference Matrix • Developed by Stephen and Rachel Kaplan at The University of Michigan • Based on evolutionary psychology • Each individual must build a cognitive map in order to survive • A cognitive map allows recognition, prediction and evaluation
Preference Matrix Pedagogy • Connect new knowledge to existing knowledge “makes sense” • Don’t overwhelm short-term memory “makes sense” • Material should engage learner “involvement” • Background of learner must be roughly understood “involvement”
CS 436 • A senior level course that introduces artificial intelligence • Making sense: clear objectives, clear syllabus, all graded work is related to the objectives, clear presentation • Involvement: engaging assignments, classroom participation
Evaluation • Fall 2004 – Spring 2006 • Senior level computer science courses at Montana State University • 2 offerings of CS 436 (33 students) • 17 other offerings (225 students)
Evaluation • How does this course compare with similar technical courses? • What is your level of interest in taking an advanced course? • Did you find this course challenging? • Were the objectives of the course clearly stated?
Evaluation • Were the objectives of the course met? • How important were the lectures? • How important were the assignments/programs? • How important were the tests/quizzes?
IV. Discussion • What are appropriate research methodologies for measuring the impact of the preference matrix in a convincing manner?