1 / 31

One Size No Longer Fits Everyone

One Size No Longer Fits Everyone. Judy Field Senior Lecturer, Library and Information Science Program Wayne State University aa4101@wayne.edu. Even in the United States. Before there were Library Schools. Librarians learned by Trial and Error

teva
Download Presentation

One Size No Longer Fits Everyone

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. One Size No Longer Fits Everyone Judy Field Senior Lecturer, Library and Information Science Program Wayne State University aa4101@wayne.edu

  2. Even in the United States

  3. Before there were Library Schools • Librarians learned by • Trial and Error • Apprentice-style training in an established library and imitating what was observed • Taking some form of classes, personal instruction or formal training often in a university library or very large municipal library

  4. The Birth of Our Profession

  5. The First Library School • In 1887 Dewey established the School of Library Economy at Columbia • Represented the first steps toward professionalism • Developed a curriculum that was a blend of instruction and practical experience • Library professional associations and library education began to work together

  6. The early graduates • Were responsible for starting: • Pratt Institute (1890) • Drexel Institute (1891) • Armour Institute (1897) • Others took leadership positions in public and academic libraries

  7. For the next 3 decades • Saw the creation of additional library schools. • This included several of the Institutes becoming full-fledged library schools • Library schools started creating a curriculum based on theory and skills • Library schools and library associations began their close association

  8. Williamson Reports (1921,1923) • Surveyed the library schools and concluded • There was a lack of minimally uniform satisfactory levels of education • Wanted clearer separation between clerical and professional work • Recommended a bachelor’s degree for admission to a library school program

  9. The library schools were to be affiliated with degree-granting institutions • An accreditation process was deemed necessary to guarantee quality

  10. Accreditation • In 1925 the Board of Education for Librarianship set minimum standards for accreditation • This was the beginning of establishing quality standards for professional library education

  11. University of Chicago (1926) • The founding of this school included scholars from a variety of disciplines who were grounded in academia. • This brought academic study and scientific research to the profession • Colloquia • A scholarly publication • A doctoral program

  12. 1940-early 70’s • Many changes occurred during this period: • Efforts continued to develop graduate level scholarship for the profession • Accreditation standards were rewritten in 1951, 1972 and 1992; • Total enrollment has varied widely • More schools developed PhD programs • Research and scholarly writing was done.

  13. In the early 70’s there were 70 accredited programs. • Stand alone Bachelor programs had been phased out. • Some Schools of Education continued to offer a minor in library work for those wanting to be a media specialists

  14. Mid 70’s-early 90’s • Technology became a larger part of the curriculum • Schools started to add the word “Information” into the titles of their programs and degrees • The 1992 Accreditation Standards were written to accommodate these changes

  15. Discussion in our professional journals and at conferences became more strident as the Internet and the Web became more prevalent in newly created courses • Libraries began to demand that new hires be technically competent

  16. The schism between the library and information science faculties became more pronounced • Questions were already being raised as to whether the new accreditation standards adequately dealt with strongly focused information science

  17. 1995- 2007 • Libraries were not the only employers asking for more technically adept employees • Bachelor degree programs focusing on developing technology expertise were added to many curriculums. • Initially computer science or business schools developed these programs

  18. By this time accredited library programs had decreased from 70 to 56. many programs had been merged with other campus programs such as communications or journalism. • Soon some LS programs decided to develop bachelor programs in technology; others partnered with other schools to jointly develop such programs

  19. Libraries were also demanding clerical employees with core professional library skills • Several new programs were developed or resurrected. • The increase adoption of technology meant libraries needed to hire full-time technicians.

  20. While all of this was happening… • The demand for information workers or knowledge managers was increasing in areas beyond libraries • A tidal wave of digitizing collections was occurring everywhere. • The USA government has rapidly move into a digital world and paper document collections are rapidly disappearing

  21. Special Librarians no longer have physical libraries but provide their services virtually • Academic libraries are rapidly decreasing their paper periodical collections • Public libraries are becoming computer training centers and a major provider of • E-books

  22. A response to these changes • The “I” school movement which is now ten years old is a model that must be further integrated into all curriculums • Their vision has shown us new ways to be information providers far beyond or library walls, • BUT a holistic, not divisive path needs to be followed

  23. This is no longer the world of leather covered books Our old friends the books are disappearing inside our computers

  24. This is no longer the world of leather covered books Our old friends the books are disappearing inside our computers

  25. Internet Search Engines Web Blogs Podcasts Audio Video RSS feeds Social Networking site Second life YouTube Nextgen Wikis Library 2.0 Library 3.0 Our rapidly evolving vocabulary includes from

  26. What does Tomorrow mean for Library Education? • Distance education will be a quality product that will foster networking beyond national boundaries and take full advantage of expertise from everywhere • Library Education must be at the forefront of providing new and innovate ways to provide access and delivery of quality information seamlessly

  27. Library Education is going to need new standards which are more encompassing • More LS programs will join WISE which will establish administrative and technology benchmarks which may help in developing new standards for the profession • The profession needs to help establish competencies that they want from all of their employees

  28. The Bottom Line • The information profession will no longer be defined as those who hold Master’s • But will reflect the Information Team comprised of the Master’s degreed professionals working closely with clerical staff and technicians

  29. We will be the standard bearers for creating quality information sources • We will set the standards for quality customer service.

More Related