1 / 70

Real space RG and the emergence of topological order

Real space RG and the emergence of topological order. Michael Levin Harvard University Cody Nave MIT. Basic issue. Consider quantum spin system in topological phase:. Topological order. Fractional statistics Ground state deg. Lattice scale. Long distances.

teva
Download Presentation

Real space RG and the emergence of topological order

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Real space RG and the emergence of topological order Michael Levin Harvard University Cody Nave MIT

  2. Basic issue • Consider quantum spin system in topological phase: Topological order Fractional statistics Ground state deg. Lattice scale Long distances

  3. Topological order is an emergent phenomena • No signature at lattice scale • Contrast with symmetry breaking order:

  4. Topological order is an emergent phenomena • No signature at lattice scale • Contrast with symmetry breaking order: Symmetry breaking Topological Sz  a

  5. Topological order is an emergent phenomena • No signature at lattice scale • Contrast with symmetry breaking order: Symmetry breaking Topological Sz  a

  6. Problem • Hard to probe topological order - e.g. numerical simulations • Even harder to predict topological order - Very limited analytic methods - Only understand exactly soluble string-net (e.g. Turaev-Viro) models where  = a

  7. One approach: Real space renormalization group Generic models flow to special fixed points: Expect fixed points are string-net (e.g. Turaev-Viro) models

  8. Outline I. RG method for (1+1)D models A. Describe basic method B. Explain physical picture (and relation to DMRG) C. Classify fixed points II. Suggest a generalization to (2+1)D A. Fixed points  exactly soluble string-net models (e.g. Turaev-Viro)

  9. Hamiltonian vs. path integral approach • Want to do RG on (1+1)D quantum lattice models • Could do RG on (H,) (DMRG) • Instead, RG on 2D “classical” lattice models (e.g. Ising model) with potentially complex weights

  10. Tensor network models • Very general class of lattice models • Examples: - Ising model - Potts model - Six vertex model

  11. Definition • Need: Tensor Tijk, where i,j,k=1,…,D.

  12. Definition • Define: e-S(i,j,k,…) = Tijk Tilm Tjnp Tkqr …

  13. Definition • Define: e-S(i,j,k,…) = Tijk Tilm Tjnp Tkqr … • Partition function: Z = ijk e-S(i,j,k,…) = ijk Tijk Tilm Tjnp …

  14. One dimensional case T T T T T T T T T T i j k Z = ijk Tij Tjk …= Tr(TN)

  15. One dimensional case T T T T T T T T T T

  16. One dimensional case T T T T T T T T T T

  17. One dimensional case T T T T T T T T T T T’ T’ T’ T’ T’ T’ik = Tij Tjk

  18. Higher dimensions Naively: T T T’ T T T T

  19. Higher dimensions Naively: T T T’ T T T T But tensors grow with each step

  20. Tensor renormalization group

  21. Tensor renormalization group • First step: find a tensor S such that n SlinSjknm Tijm Tklm i l i S l T T  S j j k k

  22. Tensor renormalization group

  23. Tensor renormalization group • Second step: T’ijk = pqr SkpqSjqr Sirp

  24. Tensor renormalization group

  25. Tensor renormalization group • Iterate: T  T’  T’’  … • Efficiently compute partition function Z • Fixed point T* captures universal physics

  26. Physical picture • Consider generic lattice model: Want: partition function ZR

  27. Physical picture • Partition function for triangle:

  28. Physical picture • Think of (a,b,c) as a tensor  • Then: ZR = …

  29. Physical picture • Think of (a,b,c) as a tensor  • Then: ZR = … Tensor network model!

  30. Physical picture • First step of TRG: find S such that i S l i l T T  S j j k k

  31. Physical picture • First step of TRG: find S such that i S l i l T T  S j j k k

  32. Physical picture • First step of TRG: find S such that i S l i l T T  S j j k k  ??

  33. Physical picture • First step of TRG: find S such that i S l i l T T  S j j k k =

  34. Physical picture • First step of TRG: find S such that i S l i l T T  S j j k k = ! S is partition function for

  35. Physical picture • Second step:

  36. Physical picture • Second step:

  37. Physical picture TRG combines small triangles into larger triangles

  38. Physical picture But the indices of tensor  have larger and larger ranges: 2L 23L … How can truncation to tensor Tijk possibly be accurate?

  39. Physical interpretation of  is a quantum wave function

  40. Non-critical case • System non-critical  is a ground state of gapped Hamiltonian  is weakly entangled: as L , entanglement entropy S  const.

  41. Non-critical case (continued) •  Can factor  accurately as 1D Tijkijk for appropriate basis states {i}. • TRG is iterative construction of Tijk for larger and larger triangles • T* = limL  Tijk i k j

  42. Critical case •  is a gapless ground state  as L , S ~ log L • Method breaks down at criticality • Analogous to breakdown of DMRG

  43. Example: Triangular lattice Ising model • Z =  exp(K ij) • Realized by a tensor network with D=2: T111 = 1, T122 = T212 = T221 = , T112 = T121 = T211 = T222 = 0 where  = e-2K.

  44. Example: Triangular lattice Ising model

  45. Finding the fixed points • Fixed point tensors S*,T* satisfy: i S* l i l T* T* = S* j j k k i i S* = T* S* S* j k j k

  46. Physical derivation • Assume no long range order • Recall physical interpretation of T*: i k j  T*ijk i j k

  47. Physical derivation • Assume no long range order • Recall physical interpretation of T*: i1 i1 i2 k i2 j  T*ijk i j k

  48. Physical derivation • Assume no long range order • Recall physical interpretation of T*: i1 k2 k1 i2 j2 j1  T*ijk i j k

  49. Physical derivation • Assume no long range order • Recall physical interpretation of T*: i1 k2 k1 i2 j2 j1 T*ijk = i2j1 j2k1 k2i1

  50. Physical derivation • Assume no long range order • Recall physical interpretation of T*:  T* =   T*ijk = i2j1 j2k1 k2i1

More Related