1 / 22

Understanding Eurozone Crises: GDP, Employment, & Credit Channels

Analyzing Eurozone crises through GDP, employment, and credit channels with US comparison, focusing on two stages of crisis and cross-country differences in leverage. Method includes DSGE model calibration with credit frictions.

tgirard
Download Presentation

Understanding Eurozone Crises: GDP, Employment, & Credit Channels

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Thepaper (I) • Main objective • Explanation of cross-country GDP and employment growth in the Eurozone (EZ) during the crisis • Using the US experience as a starting point (Mian and Sufi, 2010, Midrigan and Philippon, 2010) • In the EZ: A two-stage story of the crisis (Two stages ?): • 2007-2010: Deleveraging in the private sector • 2010-?: Fiscal consolidation and sovereign crisis • Cross-country differences in household leverage and financing costs to Governments, respectively, can explain cross-country differences in GDP, consumption, and employment growth in 2007-2009 and 2010-2011.

  2. Thepaper (II) • Method • Calibration of DSGE model with credit frictions (still preliminary) • “Islands” with representative consumers • Cash-in-advance-constraint with two sources of “money” • Two sectors (tradables, non-tradables) with sector-specific labor • Sticky wages • Intertemporal substitution modeled as adjustment costs to asset holdings • Government and private lenders are perfect substitutes. No monetary policy (M=1). Fiscal transfers providing money. • Extension (and simplification) of Midrigan and Philippon (2010) to account for fiscal policy • Two exogenous shocks: • collateral constraint to private credit • financing costs of Governments

  3. Mainquestion • Do the model’s assumptions fit well with the European experience to be explained? • Empirical evidence on the credit-consumption channel • The different nature of the crisis across EZ countries • Asymmetries and imbalances in the EZ • Credit boom, deleveraging and sovereign risk premia

  4. COMMENT #1: Relationship between credit and consumption in EUROPE Alberola, Molina and del Rio (2012)

  5. COMMENT #1: Relationship between credit and consumption in EUROPE • The role of housing as a source of liquidity • UK : Increases in housing prices led to more borrowing • Bridges, Disney and Gathergood (2009). • DK: Introduction of home equity loans led to increases in consumption. • Leth-Petersen (2010) • Less evidence for other economies, as equity withdrawal less intense • SP: Bover (2005): Estimation of wealth effects. Not very large. • Marques and Nieto (2003): Mortgage refinancing did not increase as a result of higher house prices. (Update: only in 2005 increase in mortgage debt > increase in housing investment) • 2. But even without home equity withdrawals, mortgage credit conditions may affect household consumption (SP:Masier and Villanueva, 2011). • Longer mortgage maturity partly allows to diminish the mortgage payment and increase consumption by recent home owners • Specially important if expect income to be higher later in life • 3. On the downside: Are households/firms credit-constrained? • Disentangling demand-supply of credit • SP:Hernando and Villanueva (2012): “relatively small magnitude of credit supply factors”

  6. Leverage as driving consumption: evidence for Spain • Spanish Survey of Household Finances, (EFF 2002, 2005, 2008) • A panel that allows tracking the consumption, labor supply, wealth and debt of households • The evolution of household expenditure in vehicles between 2002 and 2008 by the leverage ratio in 2002 • Some evidence of higher cyclicality of the expenditure in durables among indebted households

  7. Mainquestion • Do the model’s assumptions fit well with the European experience to be explained? • Empirical evidence on the credit-consumption channel • SOME EMPIRICAL SUPPORT. LIKELY TO BE RELEVANT. BUT PROBABLY LESS STRONG THAN IN THE US • The different nature of the crisis across EZ countries • Asymmetries and imbalances in the EZ • Credit boom, deleveraging and sovereign risk premia

  8. COMMENT #2. Same shock? Same (Labor MARKET) transmission mechanisms? GDP Employment growth (%) vs. GDP growth (2007q2-2010q2)

  9. COMMENT #2. Same shock? Same (Labor MARKET) transmission mechanisms? GDP Employment growth (%) vs. GDP growth (20010q2-2011q4)

  10. Mainquestion • Do the model’s assumptions fit well with the European experience to be explained? • Empirical evidence on the credit-consumption channel • The different nature of the crisis across EZ countries • DIFFERENT SHOCKS. • DIFFERENT LABOR MARKET RESPONSES DIFFICULT TO EXPLAIN WITH SAME DEGREE OF LABOR MARKET RIGIDITIES ACROSS COUNTRIES • Asymmetries and imbalances in the EZ • Credit boom, deleveraging and sovereign risk premia

  11. COMMENT #3. Asymmetries and imbalances • Lower productivity growth in the periphery during 1999-2007… • … and higher wage pressure, led to Alberola, Molina and del Rio (2012)

  12. COMMENT #3. Asymmetries and imbalances • …and together with lax fiscal policies to Alberola, Molina and del Rio (2012)

  13. COMMENT #3. Asymmetries and imbalances • but could have a more restrictive fiscal policy avoided the increase in external debt? Assume government consumption would have stayed constant, in per capita terms, at its 19981s level for 10 years (Scenario #1) or 20 years (Scenario #2). Beyond 2008 in Scenario #1, 2018 in Scenario #2, government consumption represents again a 17:3% of GDP in each period. Gavilán, Jimeno, Hernandez de Cos, and Rojas (2010)

  14. Mainquestion • Do the model’s assumptions fit well with the European experience to be explained? • Empirical evidence on the credit-consumption channel • The different nature of the crisis across EZ countries • Asymmetries and imbalances in the EZ • COMPETITIVENESS, EXTERNAL IMBALANCES ARE KEY TO UNDERSTAND EZ CRISIS • Credit boom, deleveraging and sovereign risk premia

  15. COMMENT #4. Sources of shocks • Endogenous leverage • The role of banks (and shadow banking) at generating credit cycles • Nuño and Thomas (2012) • Martinez-Miera and Suarez (2012) • Factors behind the financing cost of EZ Governments ? • Only fiscal variables? • Contagion effects? • Interactions public-private sectors? • Other variables?

  16. Financing cost of Governments Spain: 10y bond yield July 7th: 4.71 % July 11th: Spain wins FIFA World Cup August 27th: 3.98 % October 14th: 3.92%

  17. BACK

More Related