1 / 72

IDOB Update and Concluding Comments

Explore the post-examination surveys conducted by IDOB to assess financial institutions in Iowa from 2006 to 2009. Evaluate feedback on examiner interactions, report quality, staff knowledge, and operational disruptions.

tgumbs
Download Presentation

IDOB Update and Concluding Comments

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IDOB Update andConcluding Comments Thomas Gronstal Superintendent of Banking

  2. Post Examination Surveys • Market Information • Banking Statistics • Wrap-Up

  3. IDOB SURVEY

  4. Iowa Division of Banking Post Examination Financial Institution Assessment Comparison 2006

  5. 1 1 2 2 3 3 4 4 5 5 Strongly Agree Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree Strongly Disagree The examiner’s requests for information prior to and during the examination were reasonable. 1.59

  6. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree During the course of the examination, management was: a) Informed of relevant issues. 1.50

  7. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree During the course of the examination, management was: b) Given opportunity to respond to issues. 1.51

  8. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree During the exit meeting, the examination team clearly and effectively communicated their findings and concerns. 1.46

  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree Quality of the Report of Examination: a) The tone and content of the report were consistent with the exit meeting. 1.49

  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree Quality of the Report of Examination: b) Findings and recommendations were clear and easy to find. 1.51

  11. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree Quality of the Report of Examination: c) The recommendations were useful to your organization. 1.64

  12. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree The examination team completed the examination in a timely manner. 1.66

  13. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree The examination team caused minimal disruption to our day-to-day operations. 1.64

  14. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree The examination team conducted themselves in a professional manner. 1.35

  15. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree Your satisfaction with staff knowledge of: a) Laws, regulations, and policies. 1.52

  16. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree Your satisfaction with staff knowledge of: b) Operations. 1.55

  17. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree Your satisfaction with staff knowledge of: c) Lending. 1.51

  18. 1 2 3 4 5 Strongly Agree Mostly Agree Agree Mostly Disagree Strongly Disagree Your satisfaction with staff knowledge of: d) Your financial institution. 1.58

  19. Delinquent Mortgages

  20. 2009 Average Values Dollar Values Less than $4,000 $4,000 - $5,000 More than $5,000

  21. Average Values Adjusted for Inflation, 2009 Dollars

  22. Average Values All Grades 1950-2009

  23. Who Purchased Farmland

More Related