JCOL

1. JCOL Dr. William J Davis, Jr. USACGSC

2. Joint Course on Logistics • Introduction • Organizational Structure for Joint Planning • Joint Strategic Planning Systems • Contingency Planning • Crisis Planning

3. Course Objective The objective is to give an overview of the joint operation planning process for both contingency and crisis action planning.

5. Vocabulary C-day CAP UTC JPEC Strategic Concept LAD JOPES UIC PPBE QDR TPFDD TUCHA M-day JSCP JFAST

6. JOPES VOLs What is JOPES?Develop and Execute War Plans Joint Operation Planning and Execution System (JOPES) is acombination of joint policies and procedures, supported by IT, designed to provide joint commanders and planners with a capability to plan and conduct joint military operations.

7. Three Volumes of JOPES CJCSM 3122.01A CJCSM 3122.02C CJCSM 3122.03B JOPES VOLUME II JOINT OPERATION PLANNING AND EXECUTION SYSTEM (JOPES) VOLUME I JOPES VOLUME III (CRISIS ACTION TIME PHASED FORCE AND DEPLOYMENT DATA DEVELOPMENT AND DEPLOYMENT EXECUTION) PLANNING FORMATS (PLANNING POLICIES AND PROCEDURES) 29 Sep 2006 28 February 2006 22 March 2004

8. JOPESJoint Operation Planning and Execution System JSCP OPLAN CONPLANs SCP Commander’s Strategic Concept Crisis Contingency Planning Concept Development Plan Assessment Plan Development Strategic Guidance Crisis Action Planning Execution Situational Awareness OPORD Planning No Plan Campaign Plan OPORDs

9. Joint Planning Goal The primary goalof planning is not the development of elaborate plans that inevitably must be changed; a more enduring goal is the development of planners who can cope with the inevitable change. How successful have we been at accomplishing this?

10. JFSC / JCWS

11. Op Art / Op Design • Must use Op Art and Op Design throughout the planning process • Op Art • Application of creative imagination to design strategies, campaigns and operations • Elements of Op Design • Now includes end state, objectives, effects, and lines of operation • Systems Approach • Addition to traditional JIPB • Phasing • Element of “Arranging Ops” • Although JOPP provides a logical process to frame the planning effort, it is only the creative minds of the commander and staff that will make the plan successful JFSC / JCWS

12. Relationship of Shaping Ops JFSC / JCWS

13. Current Situation HA/DR Phasing Disaster Phase V Phase IV Phase III Phase 0 Phase I Phase II Immediate Response First 72 hours Restoration (DoD Support TBD) Initial Response Recovery Preparation Relief Stabilization (Enable Civil Auth) (Deter) (Dominate) (Stabilize) (Shape) (Seize Initiative) Support civil gov’t Civil authorities assume responsibilities (with assistance as req’d from OFDA, NGOs, IOs, etc.) Military forces redeploy Phase 0 activities resume If no legitimate, functioning civil gov’t, perform limited local governance Provide basic services to people Set conditions for transition to civil authorities • Support OFDA to: • Restore key infrastructure (roads, power, communications, etc.) • Set conditions for transition to civil authorities • Support OFDA to: • Mitigate near-term human suffering • Provide water, food, shelter, sanitation, medicine, etc. • Assess affected areas for restoration ops Continuous SA & preparedness TSC activities to enhance PN disaster preparedness and response capabilities • Immediate lifesaving when: • directed by SECDEF, or • directed by CDR for immediate lifesaving with forces in place (72 hr limit) • Assess affected areas for relief ops Phases May Overlap

14. Joint Course on Logistics • Introduction • Organizational Structure for Joint Planning • Joint Strategic Planning Systems • Contingency Planning • Crisis Action Planning

15. Elements of the Department of Defense Office of the Secretary of Defense DOD FIELD ACTIVITIES DEFENSE AGENCIES JOINT CHIEFS OF STAFF MILITARY SERVICES JOINT STAFF MILITARY DEPARTMENTS COMBATANT COMMANDS * * * *

16. Standard Military Org Chart

17. Organization ForNational Security NSC Advisors NSC President National Security Advisor Vice President Vice President Secretary Of Defense Secretary Of State Secretary of Energy DA DAF DON Secretary NAVY Chairman JCS JCS Vice Chairman Secretary ARMY Secretary Air Force CSA CSAF CNO CMC Joint Staff USA USAF USN USMC X Specified Command Unified Command Commander Functional Component Command Commander Joint Task Force Commander Sub- Unified Command Commander Service Component Command Operational Responsibilities Support Responsibilities • Combatant Command • Directive Authority • Operations Planning • Strategic Direction • Military Advice • Organize • Train • Equip • Maintain • Assign • Support

18. Joint Course on Logistics • Introduction • Organizational Structure for Joint Planning • Joint Strategic Planning Systems • Contingency Planning • Crisis Action Planning

19. JSPS and Related Systems Strategic Assessment Strategic Direction Programming Advice Strategic Plans JSPS JSPS JSPS JSPS • SMEAC • Situation • Mission • Execution • Admin • C2 The Gouge

20. JSPS and Related Systems NDS NSS QDR Strategic Assessment CRA Strategic Direction JSR NMS GEF FCB CPA Programming Advice JSCP JROC CPR JOPES/ APEX Strategic Plans PPBE PLANs IPL JPG CRS JCCA SROC JTS JFRR POMs JSPS JSPS JSPS JSPS

21. Guidance to Combatant Commanders • Joint Pub 1 • Doctrine for the Armed Forces of the United States • UCP • Unified Command Plan (FOUO) • Combatant Commander Command Relationships

22. Over 4 million parts…each one built by the lowest bidder… BEST VALUE

23. Joint Course on Logistics • Introduction • Organizational Structure for Joint Planning • Joint Strategic Planning Systems • Contingency Planning • Crisis Action Planning

24. Contingency Plans NSS QDR CRA Strategy JSR NDS NMS FCB CPR Resources JROC JPG CPA JFRR GEF JSCP

25. Secretary of Defense Initiatives • Realign five (5) Phases of Deliberate Planning into four (4) Functions of Contingency Planning • Redefined six (6) Phases of Crisis Action Planning into three (3) Functions.

26. JOPESJoint Operation Planning and Execution System JSCP OPLAN CONPLANs SCP Commander’s Strategic Concept Crisis Contingency Planning Concept Development Plan Assessment Plan Development Strategic Guidance Crisis Action Planning Execution Situational Awareness OPORD Planning No Plan Campaign Plan OPORDs

27. Global Force Mgmt Guidance Security Cooperation Guidance Global Posture Guidance Contingency Planning Guidance Nuclear Weapons Planning Guidance Built together by Task Force GEF Purpose – Consolidate Guidance Consolidating five separate documents forces holistic thinking about previously stove-piped planning Guidance for Employment of the Force Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan

28. Global Force Management • Force Apportionment Guidance for Contingency Planning (GFM Implementation Guidance: GFMIG) • 3 Bins • Force Allocation Guidance [to the Global Force Management Board (GFMB)] for operations and shaping activities • 5 Tiers of Priorities

29. New Apportionment Construct JSCP 06 JSCP 08 Plans Force Bins Plans Force Bins HD NORTHCOM/ ELEMNORAD/PACOM HD NORTHCOM / PACOM USELEMNORAD/SOUTHCOM Homeland Defense - HD Homeland Defense - HD Campaign 1 XXXXXXXX Forces not available for planning Current Operations XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX Forces available for planning XXXXXXXXX Campaign 2 XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX NDS required the ability to conduct 2 overlapping campaigns XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX XXXXXXXX • Proposed construct accounts for employed forces • Establishes a more realistic start point for planning • Not intended to be the equivalent of contingency sourcing • Improves CCDR’s ability to assess military risk to execute a plan

30. Design Element: “Arranging Operations – Phasing” 31 JP 5-0, p. IV-34 (26 Dec 2006)

31. DOD Global Campaign Plan DOD Global Campaign Plan DOD Global Campaign Plan #### #### Relationship of Planning Efforts Theater Campaign Plan Campaign(s) Subordinate Campaign Plans YYY XXX ZZZ Indicates a supporting campaign plan synchronized with a Global Campaign Plan Indicates campaign or contingency plans nested under a Theater Campaign Plan Contingency Plans XXX YYY ZZZ Contingency plans to subordinate campaign plans are not stand alone plans, but are branches to the subordinate campaign plans.

32. The Never-ending Theater Campaign Plan (TCP) TCP (security cooperation/Phase 0) Contingency as a branch plan from the TCP Once the contingency is over, the end state is back to day-to-day military activities (phase 0, which is the theater campaign plan) The end-state that doesn’t end (NSS objectives and interests)

33. Global Core Partners COCOM Regional or Functional End State(s) Security Cooperation Focus Areas Operational Access and Global Freedom of Action Operational Capacity and Capability Inter-operability Intelligence and Information Sharing Assuranceand Regional Confidence Building Security Sector Reform Defense Exports and International Collaboration National and MultinationalInfluence Security Cooperation Activities/Tools Security Cooperation/Shaping Activities Global End State(s) The COCOM campaign plan is the mechanism for organizing, integrating and prioritizing security cooperation activities Critical Partnerships Key Supporting Partnerships Countries of Concern

34. There is no better diplomat than a naval aviator on liberty!!

35. Campaign Planning Efforts Global/Functional Campaigns Global War on Terror Homeland Defense Defense Support of Civil Authorities Global Pandemic Influenza Combating WMD Strategic Deterrence & Global Strike Cyberspace Space Regional Campaigns USAFRICOM USCENTCOM USEUCOM USNORTHCOM USPACOM USSOUTHCOM

36. JOPES Functions and Joint Planning JOPES Functions Threat Identification & Assessment Detailed Planning COA Development Strategy Determination Implementation Contingency Planning III Plan Development JSPS IPR C IPR F II Concept Development IV Plan Assessment IPR A IPR R I Strategic Guidance JSCP Warning Order Planning Order Crisis Action Planning Execute Order Situation Awareness Planning Execution Alert Order

37. Initiation Strategic Guidance Concept Development Plan Development

38. JOPP Generic • Receive and analyze required tasks. • Review and refine adversary situation • Develop and compare alternative courses of action. • Select the best course of action. • Submit and gain concept approval. • Prepare a plan based on approved concept. • Complete the planning document. JFSC / JCWS

39. JOPP Step 1: Initiation • CJCSM 3122 (JOPES) specifies JPEC • Milestones, deliverables and interaction points • Differences between Contingency and CAP • Contingency Initiation • CPG / SGS / JSCP • Commander’s Guidance • Formation of planning team (JPG, OPG, etc) • CAP Initiation • Warning Ord / Planning Ord / Alert Ord JFSC / JCWS

40. JOPP Step 2 (FC Draft JP 5-0 Jan ’06)

41. JTF Commander's Orientation • PACOM Commander's Intent • Purpose: Provide immediate life sustaining support to the GOB, reduce further loss of life, mitigate human suffering. • Key Tasks: • Designate COMMARFORPAC as CDR-JTF • Preposition Relief Supplies and Equipment in anticipation of support request. • BPT to conduct operations as part of a multi-national relief effort or in support of a third country • BPT establish a joint logistics hub in the vicinity of Burma • Conduct FHA in support of OFDA • Transition FHA functions to other agencies as soon as practical • Redeploy/Reposition forces upon completion of the mission or as directed. • Endstate: Demand for Emergency Relief decreased to the point where GOB and the humanitarian community can meet relief requirements and begin recovery operations without U.S. Military Assistance. Human suffering is alleviated. U.S. Forces are safely redeployed.

42. JTF Specified Tasks (1/3) (1) BPT PROVIDE DISASTER RELIEF SUPPORT IN COORDINATION WITH USAID/OFDA. (2) PROVIDE JTF-CDR'S ESTIMATE WITH COURSES OF ACTION AND RECOMMENDED COURSE OF ACTION TO USPACOM J3 NLT 071300ZMAY08. (3) DEVELOP SITUATIONAL AWARENESS AND CONDUCT ASSESSMENTS IN SUPPORT OF FHA RELIEF OPERATIONS TO THE EXTENT POSSIBLE. (4) BPT PROVIDE MOBILITY ASSETS IN SUPPORT OF RELIEF EFFORTS AS REQUIRED. (5) BPT DELIVER FOOD, WATER, EMERGENCY MEDICAL SUPPORT, MEDICINE AND OTHER RELIEF SUPPLIES AS REQUIRED. (6) BPT PROVIDE LIMITED TRANSPORTATION OF DISPLACED PERSONS TO DESIGNATED AREAS FROM LOCATIONS INACCESSIBLE TO HN TRANSPORTATION ASSETS.

43. JTF Implied Tasks (1/1) • Establish FCE in Rangoon • Establish HN / JTF coordination element in Rangoon • Establish LNOs with MPAT for coordination/deconfliction with International Aid agencies. • BPT Establish FOB or FARPs in Thailand/Burma as required. • Establish Air C2 concept to deconflict JTF tactical and operational air with HN and Non-DOD aviation • Seek clearance to fly non-DOD personnel and supplies

44. Assumptions (1/2) • SECDEF WILL DIRECT USPACOM TO ASSIST WITH DISASTER RELIEF IN BURMA. • USPACOM FORCES WILL EXECUTE OPERATIONS AS A PART OF A MULTI-NATIONAL RELIEF EFFORT OR IN SUPPORT OF THE EFFORTS OF A THIRD COUNTRY. • BURMA WILL REQUEST U.S. HUMANITARIAN ASSISTANCE. • BURMA WILL PROVIDE FORCE PROTECTION FOR US FORCES IF ALLOWED IN THE COUNTRY. • GOB WILL DIRECT OVERALL RELIEF EFFORT. • GROUND TRANSPORTATION NETWORK IN THE AFFECTED AREAS OF BURMA IS SERIOUSLY DEGRADED OR UNUSABLE.

45. Proposed Mission Statement • CDRUSSOUTHCOM conducts PHASE II (RELIEF) ISO the USAMB/Country Team in coordination with MINUSTAH/ NGOs/OGA/USAID IOT mitigate near term human suffering and accelerate recovery in Haiti. BPT transition to PHASE III (RESTORATION).

46. Proposed JTF Mission O/O, JTF conducts Humanitarian Assistance (HA) and Disaster Relief (DR) Operations IVO Central Burma to support International relief efforts IOT reduce further loss of life and mitigate human suffering.

47. JOPP Step 3

48. Deploy HMM-262 det/ HMM-265 CH-53 det/ HM-14 det to Utaphao Deploy HMM-265 aboard 31st MEU/ ESX ARG in MODLOC vic Gulf of Martaban Establish FOB in Mae Sot, TH Establish FARP at Rangoon Intl, MY OPS and LOG nodes JTF HQ/1st MAW Khorat, TH 3rd MEB proposed FARP Rangoon Mae Sot FOB Intermediate Logistics Staging Base Main relief aid distribution point Rapidly establish initial relief capability Build to maximum capacity as resources and authorities allow. Conduct assessments Deploy FCE to Burma Project aid relief fwd from Utaphao via KC/C-130s and Mai Sot to Rangoon when authorized 3 MEB MFP 1 2 COA Balanced Response 5 2 4 3 4 3 FRDP FOB 3 OPS LOG 1 1 2 2 3 4 1 FOB 4 5 C2 Links Forward Refuel/Distribution Pt FRDP

49. JOPP Step 4

50. JOPP Step 5