1 / 14

Heat Exchanger Design

Heat Exchanger Design. Fall 2005 December 13, 2005. ME 414 Thermal / Fluid System Design William Donelson Josh Fosso Laurie Klank Jonathan Moore. Professor: John Toksoy. Problem. Cool a Fluid From 35 ºC to 25ºC Mass Flow 80,000 kg/hr Fluid is Corrosive

Download Presentation

Heat Exchanger Design

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Heat Exchanger Design Fall 2005 December 13, 2005 ME 414 Thermal / Fluid System Design William Donelson Josh Fosso Laurie Klank Jonathan Moore Professor: John Toksoy

  2. Problem • Cool a Fluid • From 35ºC to 25ºC • Mass Flow 80,000 kg/hr • Fluid is Corrosive • Fluid Properties are Approximated by Water • Use City Water to Cool • Available at 20ºC

  3. Assumptions • Shell and Tube HX • Corrosive Fluid Requires Stainless Steel Tubes • Fouling is Negligible • Easier to Clean • Shell is Thin, Light as Possible

  4. Begin Study • Given Tube Arrangement • Choose Tube Arrangement • Cleaning • Assembly

  5. Analysis

  6. Observations • More on this Later • Length can be Calculated • Heat Transfer is Always as Desired • Nusselt Number Correlation

  7. Minimize Cost • Assume HX Lifespan is 7 Years • Labor-Upkeep and Assembly • Arrangement and Materials • Operating • Electricity for Pumps • Cooling Water Considered Separately • Materials

  8. Cost Function • Electricity • $0.06558 kW·hr (IPL) • Pump Efficiency = 0.7 • Materials • Wholesale Metal Prices Compared with Finished Product Prices to Get Value Added Multiple • Multiple = 5 (McMaster) • Wholesale Stainless Steel = $2.86/kg • Wholesale Aluminum = $1.88/kg (metalprices.com)

  9. Approach • Cost Function Automatically Weighs • Pressure Drops • Weight • Q is Always Equal to Desired by Calculating Length • With Trial the Only Other Constraints Were the Fluid Velocities

  10. Trial 1 Tubes Need to be Standard Size Velocities Must be Within Acceptable Range 0.6<Shell Velocity<1.5 m/s 0.9<Tube Velocity<2.5 m/s Minitab Does Not Recognize the Effect of M Dot on Cost

  11. Final Trial After Further Refinement Optimum M Dot = 55.25

  12. Final Design • M Dot Cooling Fluid= 55 kg/s • Tube OD = 0.38 inch BWG 24 • Shell ID = 12 inches • Length = 3.4102 m • Tube Pressure Drop = 6047 Pa • Shell Pressure Drop = 9308 Pa • Total Weight = 443 kg

  13. Total Cost • $5720 • Plus Labor • Plus Water

  14. Cost of Water • Since TC,o cannot Exceed TH,i the mass flow of the Cooling Water has Lower Bound of 15 kg/sec • This translates into 1,370,000 ft3/month $13,900/Month Indianapolis Water

More Related