1 / 10

IEA Executive Committee meetings of Large Tokamak Facilities and Poloidal Divertor IAs

IEA Executive Committee meetings of Large Tokamak Facilities and Poloidal Divertor IAs. General Atomics, San Diego, CA June 3-4, 2008. Opening Comments. Good representation from EU, JA, KO, US, IEA Regrets for absence of several members Mostly Joint meeting of the two IAs

thai
Download Presentation

IEA Executive Committee meetings of Large Tokamak Facilities and Poloidal Divertor IAs

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. IEA Executive Committee meetings of Large Tokamak Facilities andPoloidal Divertor IAs General Atomics, San Diego, CA June 3-4, 2008

  2. Opening Comments • Good representation from EU, JA, KO, US, IEA • Regrets for absence of several members • Mostly Joint meeting of the two IAs • Several common issues • Agenda includes more than routine work • Continue discussion of several issues in 2007 • Respond to evolving fusion programs

  3. Common Topics for Discussion • Report from FPCC meeting, February 2008 • Input to new 3 Yr FPCC Mandate • Future direction and ‘restructuring of IAs’ • Support for ITER R&D during construction • Issues described in ITER Research Plan • ITPA under ITER auspices and ITPA-IEA Joint experiments • IEA sponsorship of IAEA TCMs • H-Mode and Energetic Particles • Support for Nuclear Fusion Journal • Start of a new tokamak - KSTAR

  4. Action Items from the FPCC Meeting • 37th of FPCC – 26-27 February, Paris • Carrie Pottinger – new FPCC desk officer • Gianelli, Kikuchi, and Oktay participated • ITER Organization now regular participant • New FPCC Mandate to CERT in October • Support for ITER and BA • Other activities • ‘Restructuring’ of IAs to be more effective • Closer Interaction between IEA FPCC and IAEA IFRC • Should IEA sponsor IAEA TCMs on H-Mode and EP? • IAEA offer to hold the next FPCC meeting at IAEA in conjunction with IFRC

  5. Streamlining of IAs • FPCC Discussions for past few years • FPCC consensus at the last meeting • Nuclear technology, Materials, and ESE IAs continue as separate IAs • Alternates (Stellarators, RFP, and STs) continue as separate IAs – more commonality with tokamaks • ExCos for tokamak related IAs (LT, PD, PWIT) to make recommendations • Input needed for the new FPCC Mandate

  6. Current Status of Tokamak IAs • Expiration dates of Agreements • PD (July 2010); EU, US, KO; (CN and IN invited to join) • LT (Dec 2010); EU, US, JA (JAEA) • PWIT (Dec 2012); EU, CA, US, JA (NIFS) • The IAs decide their future direction • Need to make recommendations to FPCC

  7. Four Options for Tokamak IAs • Transform from ‘facility’ to ‘topical’ focus • LT – Burning Plasmas • PD – Steady State Physics and Technology • PWI in TEXTOR – PWI in all concepts • Combine LT and PD into one Tokamak IA • PWIT continues as PWI • Combine three IAs into one Tokamak IA • No change – horizontal tasks on common topics

  8. Aim is efficiency and enhanced contributions • Minimize meetings and workshops • Coordinate common activities • Enhance response to ITER needs • Promote broader fusion research • Accommodate changing programs • New tokamaks in China and India • Only JET among three large tokamaks left operating • How to incorporate JT-60SA in the future • One single Tokamak Agreement might be too ‘complicated’

  9. Outcome of this meeting • No urgency to make a final decision yet • Need to have some discussion of this matter in the FPCC mandate • due in October • Identify pros and cons of each option • Input to further discussions around the ITPA CC meeting at Cadarache on June 30-July1

  10. Urgent ITER Issues • Critical physics and technology issues impacting ITER design now • Ongoing R&D during ITER construction • Extensive discussions in • ITER Organization (IO) • Domestic Agencies (DAs) • Science and Technology Advisory Committee

More Related