270 likes | 394 Views
The 7-year view of the accreting X-ray binaries with INTEGRAL. R.Krivonos, M.Revnivtsev, S.Tsygankov, E.Churazov, R.Sunyaev MPA Garching, Germany; IKI, Moscow, Russia. Galactic Center region, 20 Ms, 17-60 keV. Limiting flux ~0.26 mCrab 3.7e-12 erg/s/cm 2
E N D
The 7-year view of the accreting X-ray binaries with INTEGRAL R.Krivonos, M.Revnivtsev, S.Tsygankov, E.Churazov, R.Sunyaev MPA Garching, Germany; IKI, Moscow, Russia
Galactic Center region, 20 Ms, 17-60 keV • Limiting flux ~0.26 mCrab 3.7e-12 erg/s/cm2 • Luminosity 4e+34 erg/s at the distance of GC The Milky Way is a unique galaxy where we can detect X-ray objects with the lowest possible luminosities.
Galactic Center region, 20 Ms, 17-60 keV Stellar density field
Low-Massive X-ray Binaries in Bulge Revnivtsev et al., 2008
Low-Massive X-ray Binaries in Bulge Break in dM/dT distribution? Change in Lx – dM/dT relation? Recent: the break is due to different classes of companion stars: Gilfanov 2004 d log N / d log L = -0.96 +/- 0.20 at log(L) < 37 Revnivtsev et al., 2010
Cataclysmic Variables: first approach Galactic ridge X-ray emission with INTEGRAL It is shown that the Ridge is due to point sources at energies <10 keV (Revnivtsev et al. 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009)` What is in hard X-rays?
INTEGRAL view of the GRXE NIR contours Krivonos et al. 2006, 2009
Galactic ridge emission in hard X-rays consists of emission of millions of CVs! INTEGRAL RXTE Shape of cutoff average mass of WDs <Mwd>~0.5-0.6 Msun
Cataclysmic Variables: second approach Cataclysmic Variables • The dominant class of INTEGRAL CV is intermediate polars • Revnivtsev et al., 2008 • INTEGRAL provides one of the largest unbiased sample of luminous intermediate polars existing today (37 in the 7-year survey) • The survey is serendipitous with respect to CVs INTEGRAL
Cataclysmic Variables Scale height of Galactic disk population is 130 (+90-50) kpc
Ridge value in 17-60 keV Luminosity function ofhard X-ray emitting CVs only from INTEGRAL allsky survey! INTEGRAL points Revnivtsev et al. 2008 RXTE points Cumulative emissivity of CVs in 17-60 keV
Density of HMXBs In the Galactic plane INTEGRAL survey Simple toy model Lutovinov et al. 2005, 2007
The position of spiral arms(ignored) Shtykovskiy & Gilfanov 2007
Method: Integrate the galactic disk model with a given luminosity function, given survey sensitivity map, and measure the probability to have the observed distribution of sources.
High-Massive X-ray Binaries distribution over the Galactic longitude Norma Crux Carina Sgr Cyg -- measured -- not ID -- predicted
Disk size r_disk = 2.2 (+0.6-0.4) kpc
Gamma = 1.3 (+0.3-0.2) Voss & Ajello 2010 Probing the LF (single) slope over Log(L) 33-38 -Gamma dN/dL ~L
Maximum Likelihood HMXB Luminosity Function delta Likelihood < 1.0 Log
Unrealistic LF shape: Overprediction at low luminosities Log
Unrealistic LF shape: Underprediction at low luminosities Like “Propeller effect” Log
Absolutely unrealistic LF shape: dN/dL~L^1.5 Log
Concluding remarks (1) • The perfect sky imaging with IBIS/ISGRI is possible: • IKI/RSDChttp://hea.iki.rssi.ru/integral • MPA http://www.mpa-garching.mpg.de/integral • 7-year Galactic Bulge Map • Galactic Plane Survey • Galactic Bulge Monitoring • Catalog of sources with spectra and lightcurves INTEGRAL/IBIS 7-year All-Sky Hard X-Ray Survey. Part I: Image Reconstruction A&A (arXiv:1006.2463) INTEGRAL/IBIS 7-year All-Sky Hard X-Ray Survey. Part II: Catalog of Sources A&A (arXiv:1006.4437)
Concluding remarks (2)LMXB in Bulge • Flat end of luminosity function at Log (L) < 37 • The cumulative angular distribution in the Galactic center region traces the cumulative number of stars (bulge and nuclear stellar disk components) => Break in dM/dT distribution? => Change in Lx – dM/dT relation? => Different classes of companions
Concluding remarks (3)Cataclysmic Variables • The scale height of the Galactic disk 130 (+90-50) kpc • Luminosity Function • Luminosity density is consistent with that measured from unresolved emission (“Rigde”)
Concluding remarks (4)HMXB • Spatial distribution of HMXB allows one to constrain lower and upper limits for luminosity function regardless distance information • Probe of flattening at Log (L) < 34 “Propeller effect”