1 / 10

Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices

Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices. Date: 2014-05-13. Authors:. Background. Several contributions [references 1-10] show that significant network throughput improvements can be achieved via spatial re-use using higher CCA, TPC, DSC, or combination of these.

Download Presentation

Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Spatial Reuse and Coexistence with Legacy Devices Date:2014-05-13 Authors: James Wang et. al., MediaTek

  2. Background • Several contributions [references 1-10] show that significant network throughput improvements can be achieved via spatial re-use using higher CCA, TPC, DSC, or combination of these. • However, some co-existence issues are observed from the simulation results • Starvation of legacy devices, when legacy devices co-exist with the spatial reuse devices • Higher collision • This contribution analyze these issues and explore the fairness basis for co-existence with legacy devices James Wang et al, MediaTek

  3. Channel Access Issues in Dense Environment Ref 11 provides a real life scenario of a dense deployment campus network which shows high channel busy condition (low likelihood of channel access) despite high percentage (>50%) of STAs transmit with highest MCS James Wang(MediaTek)

  4. Starvation of Legacy Devices • STA3 and STA4 use spatial re-use during TXOP 1 to access the channel, it delays the legacy STAs channel access window from the end of TXOP1 to the end of TXOP 2. • STA3 and STA4 have unfair advantage (over legacy devices) for channel access  the starvation of legacy devices during co-existence. James Wang et al, MediaTek

  5. Fairness to Legacy Devices The fairness issue during spatial re-use can be addressed with the medium sharing rules (from 11ah Clause 9.48.4) which mandates spatial-reuse TXOP (TXOP2) to end at or before the expiration of TXOP 1. James Wang et al, Mediatek

  6. Higher Collision Issue • The spatial re-use STAs should reduce its transmit power level during spatial reuse to prevent causing collisions to legacy STAs. Spatial Reuse STA 3 Legacy STA1 Legacy STA2 • Spatial reuse STA using higher CCA levels can transmit in the middle of a TXOP owned by a legacy STA, which operates at lower CCA levels, potentially causing collision to legacy STA, resulting in • higher power consumption due to re-transmission • reduced throughput James Wang et al, Mediatek

  7. TPC during Spatial Re-use STA AP TX Pwr TX PWR Reduction = CCI AP TPC SpaceLoss CCI SpaceLoss CCI CCI Spatial re-use STA CCA CCA Noise floor Noise floor • A reasonable transmit power level for the spatial reuse device is to reduce TX PWR by CCI (co-channel interference) • This transmit control is only used during spatial re-use and is based on the received CCI. (Note that spatial reuse STA needs to operate at high noise level (CCA+CCI)) James Wang et al, MediaTek

  8. Spatial Detection Window Spatial Reuse CCI 1 Legacy STA1 CCI 1 STA 3 CCI 2 CCI2 Legacy STA2 • Since there are two STAs involved in a frame exchange, the spatial re-use STA should consider CCIs from both STAs involved in the frame exchange. • TPC power level for spatial re-use STAs should be TX PWR reduction = max(CCI1, CCI2) • Spatial reuse STA uses a spatial detection window to measure CCI 1 and CCI 2 before transmission James Wang et al, Mediatek

  9. Conclusions and Future Works • This contribution discusses the legacy device starvation issues due to spatial re-use as observed from previous contributions • This contribution proposes mechanisms to achieve fairness for co-existence with legacy STAs when spatial re-use is used. • Spatial re-use should have independent channel contention and its TXOP should be confined within the duration original TXOP • Transmit power of the spatial reuse STAs should be constrained as described in Slide 7 (or 6) • Future work • Simulation results for the use case scenarios will be presented • Further investigation of transmit power control mechanism for spatial re-use James Wang et al, Mediatek

  10. References Ron Porat, Broadcom, 11-14-0082-00 Improved Spatial Reuse Feasibility - Part I Jinjing Jiang, Marvell, 11-14-0372-00 System level simulations on increased spatial reuse Graham Smith, DSP Group, 11-14-1290-01 Dynamic Sensitivity Control for HEW Graham Smith, DSP Group, 11-14,0294-02 Dynamic Sensitivity Control Channel Selection and Legacy Sharing Imad Jamil, Orange, 11-14-0523-00-00ax Mac Simulation Results for DSC and TPC Graham Smith, DSP Group, 11-14-0328-02 Dense Apartment Complex Throughput Calculations Graham Smith, DSP Group, 11-14-0045-02 E-Education Analysis Graham Smith, DSP Group, 11-14-0058-01 Pico Cell Use Case Analysis Graham Smith, DSP Group, 11-13-1489-05 Airport Capacity Analysis Graham Smith, DSP Group, 11-13-1487-02 Apartment Capacity - DSC and Channel Selection Chingwa Yeh, MediaTek, 11-14-0648-00 Performance Observation of a Dense Campus Network r0 James Wang et al, Mediatek

More Related