1 / 31

Onyx Gas Capture and Flaring Project Alexandria, Egypt

Onyx Gas Capture and Flaring Project Alexandria, Egypt. Amr Abdel-Aziz, Ph.D. Integral Consult, Egypt. Background. Onyx Alexandria. Onyx Alexandria is owned by Veolia Environment Veolia is Ranked 1 st in Europe and 2 nd worldwide in the field of solid waste collection and disposal

thane
Download Presentation

Onyx Gas Capture and Flaring Project Alexandria, Egypt

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Onyx Gas Capture and Flaring ProjectAlexandria, Egypt Amr Abdel-Aziz, Ph.D. Integral Consult, Egypt

  2. Background Onyx Alexandria • Onyx Alexandria is owned by Veolia Environment • Veolia is Ranked 1st in Europe and 2nd worldwide in the field of solid waste collection and disposal • Operates in 33 countries with 68,000 employees

  3. Background Contract • 18 district served with a total area of 7,200 km2 • 2,700 t/d to be collected, part composted and the remaining is landfilled • Biogas collection and leachate treatment systems should be installed • No biogas capture rate specified in the contract

  4. Location of Landfills • Borg El Arab (All seasons except summer) • El Hammam (Summer season)

  5. Project Description • A biogas collection system is installed • Collected biogas is utilized for leachate treatment • Onyx is not obliged to collect excess methane not needed for leachate treatment • Will install additional 3 flaring units of capacity 1,500 m3/h each to flare excess methane

  6. Project Description Biogas Collection Leachate Collection Leachate Treatment

  7. Baseline – AM0002 Applicability • Onyx is responsible for all aspects of the landfill • Contract awarded through a competitive bid • Onyx should collect the biogas (no specific quantity)  quantity used for leachate treatment is the baseline • No other landfill in Egypt collects and flares biogas • No generation of electricity using the captured landfill gas occurs (may be considered in the future)

  8. CH4projected,y:Methane projected to be generated during a given year K: Decay rate Lo: m3 CH4 / t MSW Wastecontract,t:Waste projected to be lanfilled at year t Baseline - Application • First order decay model – IPCC guidelines

  9. Baseline - Application Assumption of k • K depends on local conditions e.g. temp., moisture content of MSW, pH, and nutrients • IPCC guidelines  ranges from 0.005 to 0.4 per year • US EPA  0.1 for wet conditions • Moisture content in Alexandria waste is 60% • K assumed 0.05 for conservativeness

  10. Baseline - Application Estimation of Lo MCF Methane correction factor assumed 1 DOC Degradable organic carbon assumed 0.19 (IPCC recommends 0.21 for Egypt) DOCf Fraction of organic carbon converted to landfill gas (assumed 0.77) F Fraction of CH4 in landfill gas (assumed 0.5)

  11. Baseline - Application W06 W04 W03 W05

  12. Baseline - Application Projected Methane Generated - BA

  13. Baseline - Application Projected Methane Generated - HA

  14. Baseline - Application Methane Needed for Leachate and 20% of Generated Methane - BA

  15. Baseline - Application Methane Needed for Leachate and 20% of Generated Methane - HA

  16. Baseline - Application Baseline Methane Emissions (m3)

  17. Baseline - Application Baseline Methane Emissions (t CO2e)

  18. Baseline - Adjustment Correct  CH4contract,y:Methane required to be flared each year as per contract FD: Fraction of methane collected in baseline CH4baselinr,y:Methane specified in contract adjusted by actual waste and actual % CH4 in LFG R: Fraction of CH4 in LFG Project Correct  FP: Fraction of methane collected in project CH4flared,y Actual methane flared during year y

  19. Additionality Economic • The baseline emissions are based on the approval of the leachate treatment system • For other landfills, systems approved by the government are passive collection system (max. efficiency 20%) • No regulations for biogas collection -- only guidelines which does not mandate the use of specific technology • Additional flaring equipment  additional costs  No expected additional revenues  continue business as usual is most attractive course of action

  20. Emission Reduction CH4baseline,y CH4flared,y ERy:GHG reduction in t CO2e ER_CH4y:Methane emission reduction in m3 CF: 0.000662 t CH4/m3 CH4 GWP_CH4: 21 (Global warming potential for CH4) Project Baseline

  21. Emission Reduction Annual Emission Reduction (t CO2e)

  22. Corrected by monitoring CH4 flar ed Corrected by monitoring actual waste and % CH4 in LFG CO2 from Electricity Generated on-site Emission Reduction 6,580,572 t CO2e 1,647,255 t CO2e Project Baseline

  23. Monitoring Methodology • Applicability • Project activities that reduce green house emissions through landfill gas capture and flaring • Baseline established by a public concession contract

  24. Monitoring Methodology • Monitoring emissions from project activity • Measured • LFG (c) • % CH4 in LFG (c) • Temp. (c) • Pressure (c) • SW disposed (d) • Calculated • Amount of methane flaring for baseline (a) • Amount of methane collected in addition to baseline (a) • CO2e reduced (a) a annual, d daily, c continuous

  25. Monitoring Methodology • Quality Control / Quality Assurance Procedures • Procedure for equipment calibration • Will be included in ISO 9000/14000 certification process

  26. Crediting Period • Contract duration is 15 years • Started in October 2001 and ends in October 2016 • Project expected to start in June 2005 • 11 y 4 m will remain in contract duration • First crediting period is 7 years

  27. Environmental Impacts • Flaring will also destroy compounds in the biogas such as VOCs • Negative impacts of methane: • Odour • Risk of explosion • Negative impacts of VOCs • Odour • Toxicity • Carcinogenic • Photochemical reactivity  O3 health effects and damage to crops and plants

  28. Project Status • PDD: Final Draft • Financing Situation: Self Financed • DNA Approval: Preliminary approval • Project Implementation: Not yet

  29. Bioreactor Landfills at Greater Cairo PIN

  30. Project Description • Waste is actively degraded rather than decomposed slowly • Leachate will be recirculated and monitored • Gas generated will be collected and flared • A pilot project has been implemented at Waffa and Amal Landfill in Cairo and is currently under evaluation

  31. Expected CERs • Crediting Period: 14 years. • Project Start Date: 2006 • Annual CERs Expected: 430,000 (average) • Total expected CERs: 6.5 M

More Related