80 likes | 191 Views
Aim: To evaluate the validity of an argument through identification and analysis of evidence and appeals. Do Now: Wo rds of the Day.
E N D
Aim: To evaluate the validity of an argument through identification and analysis of evidence and appeals. Do Now: Words of the Day I won't claim to be an impartialbiographer. McCandless's strange tale struck a personal note that made a dispassionaterendering of the tragedy impossible. Through most of the book, I have tried--and largely succeeded, I think--to minimize my authorial presence. But let the readers be warned: I interrupt McCandless's story with the fragments of a narrative drawn from my own youth. I do so in the hope that my experiences will throw some oblique light on the enigmaof Chris McCandless.
The Basics of Argument and Rhetoric excerpted from www.cfcc.edu
What is apartheid? Who is Nelson Mandela?
"Glory and Hope" Questions for Analysis http://www.africa.upenn.edu/Articles_Gen/Inaugural_Speech_17984.html 1. Make a list of the TEN words from this speech that you feel were most important to your understanding of the speech. Be sure to include the definitions. 2. Which words in your list have a POSITIVE CONNOTATION? 3. Which words in your list have a NEGATIVE CONNOTATION? 4. Copy and paste a quote from the text that you feel most clearly reveals Mandela's purpose (major claim). Then, put the quote into your own words (paraphrase). 5. Copy and paste TWO quotes from the text that you feel support Mandela's purpose (supporting claims). 6. Copy and paste Mandela's most emotional appeal (pathos). Then explain how this is an emotional appeal. 7. Do you believe Mandela makes a strong, convincing, valid argument? Why or why not?