1 / 9

Exploiting Physical Layer Advances in Wireless Networks

Exploiting Physical Layer Advances in Wireless Networks. Michael Honig Department of EECS Northwestern University. IEEE Spectrum Magazine, March 2004. Is spectrum scarce or abundant?. Spectrum is scarce Existing paradigm Spectral efficiency is an important objective.

thayles
Download Presentation

Exploiting Physical Layer Advances in Wireless Networks

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Exploiting Physical Layer Advances in Wireless Networks Michael Honig Department of EECS Northwestern University

  2. IEEE Spectrum Magazine, March 2004

  3. Is spectrum scarce or abundant? • Spectrum is scarce • Existing paradigm • Spectral efficiency is an important objective. • Physical layer advances play a crucial role in improving wireless networks. • Spectrum is abundant • Does spectral efficiency matter? • How should spectrum be allocated among services (broadcast radio/TV, cellular, internet access,…)? • Should different wireless services share an infrastructure of access points?

  4. Physical Layer Advances • Turbo (iterative message passing) • MIMO • Relay (cooperation)

  5. Exploiting MIMO • Adds degrees of freedom (DoFs) for diversity, multiplexing, interference mitigation and avoidance • Two approaches: • Transmitters do not acquire Channel State Information (e.g., space-time codes) • Transmitters acquire CSI, optimize resource allocation (e.g., water-filling) • Learning CSI can provide substantial benefits • Enables interference avoidance, can simplify coding • MIMO broadcast • Overhead (feedback + channel estimation) is probably excessive for mobile users • e.g., 4x4 MIMO OFDM with 10 users, 100 sub-channels…

  6. Distributed Resource Allocation • Exchanging “interference prices” enables distributed power control in a spread spectrum network • Maximizes sum utility over links • With MIMO/multi-carrier links, need an interference price for each signal dimension • Tradeoff between information exchange (signaling overhead) and performance Transmitter Receiver

  7. BST resources? M R M M R resources? M M M Exploiting Relays • Objective: allocate power/time/bandwidth across links to maximize network objective (e.g., sum utility). • Difficult optimization problem due to half-duplex constraints. • Is exchanging local state information (e.g., interference prices) good enough?

  8. What if spectrum is abundant? • Hinges on policy decisions • Spectrum “property rights” vs commons model • Vested interests • Still need mechanisms for spectrum sharing • Sensing? • Incentives; spectrum markets?(what’s the commodity?) • How should spectrum be allocated among services?(broadcast radio/TV, cellular, internet access,…) • Should different wireless services share an infrastructure of access points?

  9. o o o o o Will wireless nodes become generic commodities? All-Purpose Wireless All-Purpose Wireless All-Purpose Wireless All-Purpose Wireless All-Purpose Wireless All-Purpose Wireless Buy Yours Today! (Before it’s obsolete)

More Related