230 likes | 245 Views
Explore the development of Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Public-Private Partnership (PPP) initiatives in Indian public transit systems. Discover how the National Urban Transport Policy (NUTP), National Urban Renewal Mission, and BRT projects have transformed urban mobility. Learn from case studies of cities like Delhi, Ahmedabad, Pune, and Jaipur that have implemented successful BRT systems, overcoming challenges and garnering public support. Gain insights into the key factors for the successful implementation of BRT projects, including innovative financing, cleaner fuels, and private sector involvement. Discover the lessons learned and future outlook for enhancing public transport in India.
E N D
APTA – Bus Rapid Transit Conference May 4th-6th, 2009, Seattle BRT Developments and PPP in Public Transit in India Ajai Mathur Chief Operating Officer, Urban Mass Transit Company
National Urban Transport Policy - 2006 • Integrated land use and transport planning • Focus on public transport and NMT • Coordinated planning through a Unified Metropolitan Transport Authority • Innovative Financing • Use land as a resource • Greater involvement of the private sector • Cleaner fuels • Capacity building – demonstration projects
National Urban Renewal Mission • Established a partnership for the national, provincial and local governments to finance the needed urban infrastructure • National government commits $ 12 billion over a 7 year period • Linked to prescribed reforms
Thus : Established a Framework for action National Urban Transport Policy Created an incentive for implementation National Urban Renewal Mission
Initiatives taken by States • Several cities took up projects public transport enhancement projects • Among the six major cities only Delhi has focused heavily on BRT. Rest focused on metro rail systems • A range of the other million plus cities have taken up BRT • 11 cities currently implementing BRT – others on the anvil
Sequence of BRT Projects • Delhi and Ahmedabad started planning their BRT projects well before the NUTP or JNNURM were launched • Indore introduced a structured bus service and then came up with a proposal for upgrading to BRT • Pune and Jaipur were the other cities that took up BRT in the first phase • Subsequently several others followed – Bhopal, Vijaywada, Pimpri-Chinchwad, Rajkot, Surat, etc
Status • Work in progress in all cities • Two cities have started pilot operations • One city (Indore) started bus services and then moved to BRT • Others at various stages of implementation • Several problems being faced – need to be dealt with patiently
Problems • Few knew what it is • Lack of design consultants • Distant role models – Bogota and Curitiba • Inadequate Right of Way • Growing vehicular traffic • Poor image of the bus • Difficulties in operational plan design
Public Reaction • Reality – BRT impacts a very influential section of society • Very adverse public reaction when pilot BRT operations commenced in Delhi and Pune • Cities were not prepared for this • Adverse impact created doubts in other cities as well • Situation stabilizing – outlook positive
Lessons • Be prepared for adverse reaction • Public awareness very important • Start with simpler corridors to learn • Pedestrian access • Importance of a good operational plan • A local champion is critical to success
Examples of PPP in Public Transit in India City Bus Service – Indore Metro Rail System - Mumbai
Indore City Bus Service - Structure • Indore City Transport Services Ltd (ICTSL) incorporated as a public limited company • ICTSL manages the public transport system in Indore in public- private partnership • Bus operations and other services contracting or franchised to private sector • ICTSL provides common services • Regulation through Regional Transport Authority
Indore City Bus Service - Revenues The main sources of revenue are : • Fares • Sale of passes • Advertising on buses • Advertising at bus stops • Route authorization fee Revenue shared as under: • 100% fare box collection with operators • 80% of proceeds from sale of passes to operators;20% to ICTSL • 60% revenue from advertising on buses with operators;40% with ICTSL • 100% revenue from advertising at bus stops with ICTSL • 100% route authorization fee with ICTSL
Indore City Bus Service – Present Status • Fleet of 110 buses, plying 24 routes on a network length of 277 km, carrying about 110,000 passengers per day. • In its 3rd year of operation it continues to be a self sustaining financially viable system. • ICTSL is planning to add 170 buses to its fleet in 2009 Source: Embarq
Indore City Bus Service – Inadequacies • No full time CEO • Inadequate technical staff to monitor performance of bus operations • Lack of technical and managerial expertise in route planning and scheduling • No system for user feedback
Mumbai Metro • In the first phase 2006 – 2013 total 62.79 km Metro lines I,II & III are planned • Line I-11.07 km Versova-Andheri-Ghatkopar • Line II-31.87 km Charkop-Bandra-Mankhurd • Line III-19.85 km Colaba-Bandra
Mumbai Metro – Line I • Total length 11.07 km elevated • Implementing agency MMRDA • Preferred bidder selected through open competitive bidding process • Concession Agreement signed in 2007. A SPV Mumbai Metro One Pvt. Ltd incorporated by preferred bidder & MMRDA • MMRDA to have 26% equity interest in the SPV payable in cash • Concession period 35 years on DBFOT basis • Construction work in progress
Mumbai Metro – Line II • Total length 31.87 km elevated • Estimated project cost at 2008 price level US$ 1.53 billion • Implementing agency MMRDA • Concessionaire to be selected through open competitive bidding on DBFOT basis • Bidding process is on • VGF by GOI up to US $ 0.31 billion. (20% of cost) • Concession period 35 years