1 / 13

Overview of Key Areas – Monitoring of Radioactively Contaminated Scrap Metal

Overview of Key Areas – Monitoring of Radioactively Contaminated Scrap Metal. A presentation to the Group of Experts on Monitoring of Radioactively Contaminated Scrap Metal, Second Session, Geneva, 12-14 June 2006. Ronald B. Pope UNECE - Secretariat. Background.

Download Presentation

Overview of Key Areas – Monitoring of Radioactively Contaminated Scrap Metal

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Overview of Key Areas – Monitoring of Radioactively Contaminated Scrap Metal A presentation to the Group of Experts on Monitoring of Radioactively Contaminated Scrap Metal, Second Session, Geneva, 12-14 June 2006 Ronald B. Pope UNECE - Secretariat

  2. Background • Questionnaire both in 2004 and 2006 • Use to assess the contaminated scrap metal situation in States with regard to: • Regulatory Infrastructure • Monitoring • Dispostioning • Contractual • Reporting • Assessment of the 2004 responses were used to assist in discussions at the 1st session of the group of experts • Both the 2004 and 2006 responses were used to develop an overview for this, the 2nd session of the group of experts 2nd Session – Group of Experts

  3. Background (Continued) • Overview of issues in key areas developed and issued in April 2006(ECE/TRANS/AC.10/2006/4 and 10/2006/4 Add. 1) • Overview and addendum updated and revised in June 2005* • Responses received: • 48 States in 2004 • 43 States in 2006 • 7 States responding in 2006 did not respond in 2004 • 12 States responding in 2004 did not respond in 2006 • Information on experience in monitoring and controlling contamination in scrap Some countries provided by some States * Available at 2nd Session as an informal handout 2nd Session – Group of Experts

  4. 2006 Overview Analysis • Overview for 2006 (ECE/TRANS/AC.10/2006/4, Rev. 1): • Considered all inputs from both years • Was structured in terms of the three main Fields of Action in the Draft Voluntary Protocol: • Prevention • Detection • Monitoring • Was used to define • Best Practices • Areas Needing Attention Can be used at this 2nd Session of the Group of Experts to guide deliberations on the Draft Voluntary Protocol! 2nd Session – Group of Experts

  5. Prevention–Regulatory Infrastructure 2nd Session – Group of Experts

  6. Prevention–Regulatory Infrastructure (Continued) Wide Range In Penalties Exist 2nd Session – Group of Experts

  7. Prevention – Best Practices • In general: • Have established regulations • Have active enforcement programmes • Are adopting IAEA Code of Conduct • Have established exemption levels • Allow release of very low levels of radioactivity • Have established responsibilities for • training • accounting and storage of identified contaminated waste • Many are supporting “Polluter Pays” principle 2nd Session – Group of Experts

  8. Prevention – Areas Needing Attention • Data collection/analysis on radiation levels from scrap metal/processed metals • Regulatory control of NORM and TENORM • Identify sources of contamination • Strengthen contracts • Radioactive free scrap metal • Origin of scrap metal identified • Training in visual inspection and response • Standardize approach to defining transfer of ownership of scrap metal 2nd Session – Group of Experts

  9. Detection – Border Monitoring Wide Range of Extent of Monitoring of Imports & Exports 2nd Session – Group of Experts

  10. Detection – Areas Needing Attention • No best practices identified • Areas needing attention include: • States should issue clear directives & guidance • Need consistent approach to border monitoring • Standard approaches to: • Acquisition • QA • Maintenance • Calibration • Use of radiation detectors • Worldwide standard for detection alarm threshold 2nd Session – Group of Experts

  11. Response – Best Practices • Government investigation of all detection/alarm reports • Protocols for response action to alarms • Clear financial responsibilities • Clear responsibilities for physical disposition of detected materials • Specific processes for disposition of detected sources • Identified regulations and controls for transport of radioactive source or material 2nd Session – Group of Experts

  12. Response – Areas Needing Attention • Forms to guide reporting and response actions • Information brochures, bulletins, posters • Formal protocol for reporting and acting on an alarm • Consistent basis for response to alarms • Include clear definition of basis for transporting contaminated material or sources where contents are unidentified • Establishing an international standard for: • Melting contaminated metal • Accumulating detected materials • National free-of-charge disposal facilities 2nd Session – Group of Experts

  13. Additional Inputs to be Considered In Summary: • Sections D, E and F of the Overview of Key Areas elaborates on: • Best Practices, and • Areas Needing Attention • for the three main Fields of Action in the Draft Voluntary Protocol: • Prevention • Detection • Response • These sections include brief discussions of: • Evidence from the questionnaires • National examples 2nd Session – Group of Experts

More Related