1 / 11

General Session III: The ACCJC Program Review Rubric

General Session III: The ACCJC Program Review Rubric. Marcy Alancraig, Cabrillo College Carlotta Campbell, College of Alameda Lesley Kawaguchi, Santa Monica College. Outcomes for This Session. Use the ACCJC rubric to assess the viability of your program review process.

theta
Download Presentation

General Session III: The ACCJC Program Review Rubric

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. General Session III: The ACCJC Program Review Rubric Marcy Alancraig, Cabrillo College Carlotta Campbell, College of Alameda Lesley Kawaguchi, Santa Monica College

  2. Outcomes for This Session • Use the ACCJC rubric to assess the viability of your program review process. • Develop an action plan to guide and improve the program review process at your college.

  3. Where to begin? • Draw a diagram, chart, or picture of your college’s program review process. • Include all major steps and all areas on campus that go through program review.

  4. Now, • Pair off with someone from another college. • Describe or explain your drawings to each other.

  5. Program Review • ACCJC expectation: Colleges should be at the Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement level on the rubric. • This includes both Instructional and non-instructional programs and services • So, where are you?

  6. Awareness Level on rubric: • Preliminary dialogue about what data or process should be used • Recognition of existing practices and models that make use of institutional research. • Exploration of program review models by various departments or individuals. • Implentation of pilot programs in a few programs/operational units.

  7. Development Level on Rubric • PR embedded across the institution using qualitative and quantitative data • Dialogue about the results is evident within program. • Leadership groups accept responsibility for PR framework development (Senate, Admin. etc.). • Appropriate resources are allocated . • Development of framework for linking results to planning for improvement. • Development of a framework to align results to resource allocation.

  8. Proficiency Level on rubric: • PR processes in place and implemented regularly. • Results integrated into institutional planning and decision-making. • Framework is established and implemented. • Dialogue about the results evident throughout institution; part of discussion of institutional effectiveness. • Results are consistently linked to planning and resource allocation processes; college can provide specific examples. • Institution evaluates the effectiveness of its PR processes in supporting and improving student achievement and SLOs.

  9. Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement on Rubric : • PR processes ongoing, systematic and used to assess and improve student learning. • Institution refines its PR processes to improve institutional effectiveness. Results of PR used to continually refine and improve program practices, resulting in improvements in student achievement and learning.

  10. Developing a plan: • Where is your college on rubric? • How do you know? What evidence ? • What needs to be done to reach the Sustainable Continuous Quality Improvement? • Who on campus can help? • What timeline should be set? • What resources will you need to reach SCQI? • How will you know when you have reached it?

  11. Questions?

More Related