1 / 10

The Role of Business Conduct in Agriculture – Competition Concerns Gauteng Food Summit 10 July 2008

The Role of Business Conduct in Agriculture – Competition Concerns Gauteng Food Summit 10 July 2008. Overview of Presentation. Competition policy, the competition authorities and their functions C ommission’s approach to agriculture and food as a priority area Competition Concerns

theta
Download Presentation

The Role of Business Conduct in Agriculture – Competition Concerns Gauteng Food Summit 10 July 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The Role of Business Conduct in Agriculture – Competition Concerns Gauteng Food Summit 10 July 2008

  2. Overview of Presentation • Competition policy, the competition authorities and their functions • Commission’s approach to agriculture and food as a priority area • Competition Concerns • Conclusion and Implications

  3. Main sections of the • Competition Act • Merger review: whether merger likely to substantially prevent or lessen competition • Collusion between competitors prohibited • Restrictive vertical practices prohibited – vertical agreements that substantially prevent or lessen competition • Abuse of a dominant position prohibited, e.g. : • Excessive pricing • Refusing access to an essential facility • Exclusionary acts • Price discrimination

  4. Approach to agriculture & food • Prioritisation process undertaken by Commission focused on: • Accelerated and Shared Growth • Poor consumers • Where strong indications of anti-competitive conduct • Food and agro-processing identified as very important focus – critical for social welfare • Others: banking; infrastructure & construction; intermediate industrial products

  5. Context to agriculture & food • Anti-competitive conduct in bread, milling, dairy, poultry • Wider debates - liberalisation of agricultural markets with expectation of improved efficiency and lower consumer prices • Mixed outcomes at best, partly because of low levels of effective competition: • High concentration levels across the supply chain • High barriers to entry • Anti-competitive Conduct • Previous studies found no anti-competitive behaviour

  6. Bread Cartel Case Study • Commission initiated complaint in Western Cape • Leniency application received from Premier Foods • As cartels tend to be secretive, leniency assists Commission in prosecuting • Found that Premier (Blue Ribbon), Foodcorp, Tiger Brands (Albany) and Pioneer (Sasko) had agreed: • to increase price of bread to customers; • to fix their discounts to distributors; and • Close down certain bakeries • not to poach each others independent • distributors • Effect: prices higher than they would have been under competition • Ongoing investigation in baking and milling • Same four as in baking • Vertical integration: milling, bread & grain products • Animal feed milling: Rainbow Epol, Astral Meadow, • Senwesco

  7. Bread, flour and wheat prices

  8. Competition concerns & current cases? • Inputs: fertilizer • Complaints received alleging collusive behaviour and abuse of dominance on part of producers resulting in import parity pricing to detriment of farmers • Fertilizer largest input to grain production • Bulk storage (Silos) • Former cooperatives – now privatised • Referred complaint on exclusionary acts and inducement • Dominated by three main firms (Senwes, OTK/Afrgi, Noordwes) • Regional dominance • Also involved in trading activities in the derivative market (Safex)

  9. Dairy • Initiated by the Commission following information received from a milk producer • Respondents: Clover (granted immunity), Parmalat, Ladismith Cheese, Woodlands Dairy, Lancewood, Nestle and Milkwood • Collusion, including price suppression, and surplus extraction • Poultry • Recently referred to Tribunal • Respondents: Astral and Elite • Collusion to fix trading conditions, allocate markets and also abuse of dominance by Astral

  10. Conclusions & Implications • High concentrations levels prevail, leading to poor competitive outcomes: • still significant concentration, high barriers to entry and oligopolistic market structures across the value chains • State regulation appears to have been replaced by private regulation in many sectors  liberalisation has benefited processors • Directly contributes to higher food prices • Anti-competitive conduct affecting farmers contributes to lower production • Impact on poorest households • Sector is an ongoing focus for the Commission

More Related