350 likes | 454 Views
David Barnhill UCLA. Detector Stability Analysis Using MoRI Data. Motivation. Monitor detector performance of key quantities: Anode and Dynode Baselines VEM Area and Area/Peak Dynode Anode ratio Detect any peculiar behavior as a function of temperature and/or time
E N D
David Barnhill UCLA Detector Stability Analysis Using MoRI Data
Motivation • Monitor detector performance of key quantities: • Anode and Dynode Baselines • VEM Area and Area/Peak • Dynode Anode ratio • Detect any peculiar behavior as a function of temperature and/or time • Check Quality Assurance specifications suggested in November meeting
Method • We analyzed 188 preproduction tanks from January to February this year • We used LS Calibration Data (MoRI) • We analyzed RMS over this period for Anode and Dynode baselines and RMS/Mean for Dynode/Anode, VEM Area, and Area/Peak for each tank • We also looked at behavior over time and as a function of temperature • * In the next slides: • Then = September – October 2003 • Now = January – February 2004
Then Now Typical Baselines vs. Time
Then Anode Baseline RMS 3 out of spec – 2.2% Now 45 over 2 channel RMS 15 are due to pedestal readjustments 30 out of spec – 5.3%
Then Dynode Baseline RMS 1 out of spec – 0.7% Now 32 over 2 channel RMS 8 are due to pedestal readjustments 24 out of spec – 4.3%
Baseline RMS vs. Station ID Anode Dynode
Baseline Problems All 6 channels => FE problems? (~10 tanks)
Temperature Coefficients - Baselines Anode Then Now
Temperature Coefficients - Baselines Dynode Then Now
LS VEM Area Then 6 out of spec – 4.4% Now 29 over 5% 11 due to recalib. 18 out of spec – 3.2%
Then Now Tank 205 (Mage) VEM Area PMT 1 seems to be decaying
Temperature – LS VEM Area LS VEM Area Then Now
Temperature Problem • As documented in Bugzilla: • http://bugzilla.auger.org.ar/ • There is a known problem with temperature causing jumps in certain quantities • Tanks 116, 147 and possible 158 and 167 • Problem is known, but cause and solution are unknown
Then Now Tank 147 VEM Area
Then Now Tank 116 VEM Area
Then Now Typical LS VEM Area/Peak vs. Time
LS VEM Area/Peak Then All 3 PMTs in each tank affected 35 over 5% -> 6.2% 2 out of spec – 1.5% Now
Temperature - LS VEM Area/Peak Then Now
Then Now Typical Dynode/Anode Ratio
Then Dynode/Anode 7 out of spec -> 5.1% Now 8 out of spec -> 1.4%
Temperature – Dynode Anode Ratio Then Now
Then Now Tank 128 (Vatly) Dynode/Anode No entries in bugzilla
Then Now Dynode/Anode Spiky Behavior - Gone
Quality Assurance Specifications THEN NOW
Stability Conclusions • Pedestals: • All due to ~10 tanks with varying pedestals on all 6 channels • Area/Peak: • All 3 PMTs in a tank affected when one goes bad ~13 tanks • Statistics looks bad, but roughly divide 6.2% by 3 = ~2% problem • Dynode Anode ratio is more consistent and stable, 3 PMTs with bad D/A problem only • VEM Area • Temperature correlation issues ~7 PMTs • Other problems ~3 PMTs • Tanks with PMTs failing multiple specs: • 102, 193, 214, 262