290 likes | 427 Views
Past and Future Climate Simulation Lecture 5. Geoengineering our Climate. What is geoengineering? Focus on sunshade geoengineering Should we geoengineer our climate?. use less energy emit less CO 2 change climate adapt.
E N D
Past and Future Climate Simulation Lecture 5 Geoengineering our Climate • What is geoengineering? • Focus on sunshade geoengineering • Should we geoengineer our climate?
use less energy emit less CO2 change climate adapt [Keith, Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., 2000] So, what is geoengineering…..? “The intentional large-scale manipulation of the environment, particularly manipulation that is intended to reduce undesired anthropogenic climate change’’ [Keith, Annu. Rev. Energy Environ., 2000]
[based on Keith, Nature, 2001] ~100 papers to date….mostly ‘opinion’ pieces (cf. at least 50,000 on climate change!).
(1) Stratospheric sulphate aerosols Pinatubo eruption, 1991
15 m (2) Solar “sunshade” 5 m 60 cm [Angel, PNAS, 2006] They would weigh a gram each. ~15 trillion within a 100,000- km-long cloud. “It seems feasible that it could be developed and deployed in 25 years at a cost of a few trillion dollars” [Angel, PNAS, 2006]
(4) Crop albedo geoengineering Ridgwell et al. 2009
(5) Iron fertilisation • SOIREE iron fertilisation experiment.
Fully dynamic atmosphere, slab ocean: CCM3 • 3 experiments: pre-industrial, 2*CO2, geoengineered CO2 radiation pertubation Solar radiation pertubation
ΔT due to CO2 doubling alone ΔT due to CO2 doubling and reduction in solar constant – ‘geoengineered’
Seaice, control Seaice, 4*CO2 ΔT due to 4*CO2 alone Seaice, geoengineered ΔT due to 4*CO2 and reduction in solar constant – ‘geoengineered’
GCM ocean, Energy balance atmosphere: UVic • 2 experiments: A2 scenario, geoengineered Plants use water more efficiently at high CO2 – less evapotranspiration
Failure of geoengineering geoengineered A2
3 simulations: (1) Pre-industrial (PI) (2) High CO2 (4* PI), (3) High CO2 (4* PI), reduced solar constant 4*CO2 4.2% reduction in solar constant = 57 W/m2 Geoengineered Pre-industrial
Solar forcing has strong meridional gradient. CO2 forcing balances in global mean but is more meridionally homogeneous Solar forcing, TOA Temperature anomaly, Geo - PreInd
Annual mean surface temperature change Geoengineered - pre-industrial
Precipitation Soil moisture Storm tracks (500mbar EKE)
ENSO Control: σ=0.46 Geoengineered: σ=0.35
“Sunshade World” Temp “CO2 World” Temp “Sunshade World” Precip “CO2 World” Precip Lunt et al, 2008
“Sunshade World” Temp “CO2 World” Temp “Sunshade World” Precip “CO2 World” Precip What about Greenland??
The ice-sheet model • Ice-sheet model – GLIMMER. Based on Payne (1999). • Predicts evolution of ice-sheet geometry (extent, elevation). • Mass balance scheme (surface of ice-sheet) • Ice-sheet dynamics • Driven offline by temperature and precipitation from the GCM. Temperature downscaled using high-resolution orography and a constant lapse rate. [Letreguilly et al, 1991] GLIMMER [Stone et al, in prep]
control 4*CO2 4*CO2, Ridley et al, Journal of Climate, 2005
control 4*CO2 4*CO2, geoengineered Irvine et al, 2009
Sunshade Geoengineering Anomaly compared to pre-industrial climate 4*CO2 4*CO2 with sunshade SAT 4*CO2 4*CO2 with sunshade Precip Lunt et al. 2008
Fractional Sunshade Geoengineering – regional issues Irvine et al, submitted to GRL. Irvine et al, 2010
Should we Geoengineer the climate? • What are the climate changes? Can we know them well enough? • Which scheme (or combination of schemes) minimizes damage? • Who decides what damages matter most? • How to deal with the “winners” and “losers”? • “Moral Hazard” • Is it an ethical response to global warming?