50 likes | 324 Views
Xiao Min (xiao.min2@zte.com.cn) Jin LiZhong (lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn) Wu Bo (wu.bo@zte.com.cn) Yang Jian (yang_jian@zte.com.cn). MPLS-TP Throughput Estimation. draft-xiao-mpls-tp-throughput-estimation-01. What's the main differences between the solution in this draft and that in Y.1731?.
E N D
Xiao Min(xiao.min2@zte.com.cn) Jin LiZhong(lizhong.jin@zte.com.cn) Wu Bo(wu.bo@zte.com.cn) Yang Jian(yang_jian@zte.com.cn) MPLS-TP Throughput Estimation draft-xiao-mpls-tp-throughput-estimation-01
What's the main differences between the solution in this draft and that in Y.1731? For both one-way and two-way throughput estimation Binary Search vs. Increase rate with fixed step OAM msg exchange vs. No OAM msg exchange Result got At initiator MEP vs. At the remote MEP For only two-way throughput estimation Two individual results vs. One minimum result (No loopback at the remote MEP) (Loopback at the remote MEP)
Why the solution in this draft is recommended? More efficient – In most cases, binary search will take less time than fixed step length More precise – In most cases, binary search will return more precise result than fixed step length More convenient – The operator may provision and obtain result at only one MEP More reasonable – For two-way throughput estimation two individual results return
What’s updated in 01 version? Remove ACH TLVs Align format of test data packets with data plane loopback draft Add exception process into the procedures Add one open issue
Next Steps Request comments to improve this draft Move forward to WG draft