100 likes | 269 Views
Deciding on the right dispute resolution process: Arbitration Justin Michaelson. 1. It is a truly private forum. Not publicly listed. Concept of “inherent confidentiality”: Moscow City Council case. 2. Provides a flexible procedure. Not every dispute suits one level of regulation.
E N D
Deciding on the right dispute resolution process: ArbitrationJustin Michaelson
1. It is a truly private forum • Not publicly listed. • Concept of “inherent confidentiality”: Moscow City Council case.
2. Provides a flexible procedure • Not every dispute suits one level of regulation. • Adapting to the parties’ needs.
3. Choosing your own “judges” • Very often, allows the parties to select their own ‘arbitrators’ • Party autonomy.
4. Speed of process • It can be, but is not always, quicker than litigation.
Compatibility with other methods of non-binding dispute resolution process • Arbitration can easily dove-tail into other non-binding processes of dispute resolution. • The “Mediator-Arbitrator”.
Enforceable within the EU, through the exemption under Brussels Regulation 44/2001 • ‘Arbitration’ agreements work more effectively than exclusive jurisdiction clauses. • Strategic use of Exclusive Jurisdiction clauses. • Through Transport and The Front Comor
7. Facilitates the resolution of cross-border disputes • International Arbitration is intended to provide a “jurisdiction-neutral” approach.
8. “International” Arbitration Awards are Immediately enforceable • International Arbitration awards are immediately enforceable in over 140 countries. • The same is true of domestic Awards, although the regime is a little less stringent.
Conclusions • Flexible process • Judges with suitable expertise • Guided by party autonomy • Confidentiality