1 / 18

ESTABLISHING A SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE IN UGANDA – KEY FINDINGS

ESTABLISHING A SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE IN UGANDA – KEY FINDINGS. BY JUSTICE GEOFFREY KIRYABWIRE. OBJECTIVE OF PRESENTATION. Present a case for the establishment of a small claims procedure (SCP) in Uganda Presents the key “nuts and bolts”/features of such a procedure

thuyet
Download Presentation

ESTABLISHING A SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE IN UGANDA – KEY FINDINGS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ESTABLISHING A SMALL CLAIMS PROCEDURE IN UGANDA – KEY FINDINGS BY JUSTICE GEOFFREY KIRYABWIRE

  2. OBJECTIVE OF PRESENTATION • Present a case for the establishment of a small claims procedure (SCP) in Uganda • Presents the key “nuts and bolts”/features of such a procedure • Present the key recommendations for its establishment

  3. Is there need for a SCP in Uganda?

  4. Is there need for a SCP in Uganda? • Constitutional mandate Article 126 (1) • Judicial power to be exercised in conformity with the law and with the values, norms and aspirations of the people • Fast, efficient and effective justice system

  5. Is there need for a SCP in Uganda? 2. Prior Commissioned studies • The Uganda commercial justice baseline study, 2001 • ULRC study on small claim • Kiryabwire concept paper 2004 • CJRP study on civil procedure 2006 3. Call from the executive branch

  6. Defining a small claim 1. Pecuniary Jurisdiction Ug Shs 5,000,000/= 2. Subject Matter -Civil cases (commercial, debt recovery, landlord/tenant, negligence? ) - All but emphasis on low income and SMEs

  7. Organisational structure • Operate as a track within the Magistrates courts • Have its own registry • Presided over by a Commissioner who may be a Magistrate grade 1, Justice of the peace and or an Advocate of 7 years experience • Have a code of conduct

  8. SCP – annexed mediation • Suitable cases to be referred to independent mediation by court accredited mediators/institution mediation? • Successful settlements to be recorded as consent judgments

  9. Procedural features

  10. Procedural features • All parties to appear in court with witnesses • Hearing to be handled expeditiously, informally without undue regard to technicalities but embracing rules of natural justice • Evidence to be taken on oath but no cross examination without leave of court.

  11. Procedural features • Parties to represent themselves or use a legal aid scheme • Advocates for a fee to be discouraged • No costs rule (each party to bear own costs) • Court fees and other expenses allowed by court to be paid and or reimbursed • Default judgment for non attendance of defendant

  12. Procedural features • Judgment to be given immediately after hearing but where not possible then on another clearly specified date • Enforcement of judgement will be in the normal way • No appeal allowed but review before chief Magistrate for • Lack of jurisdiction • Bias by commissioner • Gross irregularity or lack of fairness

  13. Rec. 1. Financial and Human Resources • Need adequate resources financial and human • Importance of sustainable funding - Case study of Zambia (1994) • Financial budget to be subject of a separate study

  14. Rec. 2. Political and Institutional Support • Policy statements/ practice directions in support • Hosting of SCP • Payment of man power expenses etc • Amendment/enactment of laws and rules

  15. Rec. 3. Education and Training • Promote SCP among stakeholders i.e. public, bench, bar, mediators, legal aid providers • Create a SCP manual, training videos etc • Recommend a Study tour of SCC in South Africa ( USA – DC for mediation, Arizona)

  16. Rec. 4. SCP Programme administration • Dedicated oversight of programme - With Programme manager • Outreach programmes to target groups - Colorado experience • Pilot project of 2 years - Monitoring and evaluation with mid term review

  17. Rec. 5. Stakeholder involvement • Through User Committees • Bar / Bench Committees • Pro bono credit for law society mediators etc • Discourage Advocates appearing in SCC

  18. Conclusion • Duty of courts to provide a range of dispute resolution services (and not just litigation) that address the needs and aspirations of society • Poorly designed intervention result in wasted opportunities • SCP can be used to improve the judiciary’s business environment and also provide an alternative to conventional litigation • SCP and mediation are set to be the primary 21st century dispute resolution tools.

More Related