1 / 16

Mid to High Frequency (1-20 kHz) Acoustics at the Central Area, August 9-20

Mid to High Frequency (1-20 kHz) Acoustics at the Central Area, August 9-20. Applied Physics Laboratory University of Washington Peter H. Dahl, Jee Woong Choi.

thwaite-lundy
Download Presentation

Mid to High Frequency (1-20 kHz) Acoustics at the Central Area, August 9-20

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Mid to High Frequency (1-20 kHz) Acoustics at the Central Area, August 9-20 Applied Physics Laboratory University of Washington Peter H. Dahl, Jee Woong Choi Science measurement goal: measure contemporaneously MF acoustics and influencing environmental scales for ocean acoustic modeling and interpretation • Acoustic Measurements: • Bottom Loss (20log|R|) 1-20 kHz, Grazing Angles 10-80o • 3D Spatial Coherence (single and multi-paths) • Sea Surface (energy) Loss (single and multi-paths) • Sea Surface backscattering (11-60 kHz) • Environmental Measurements: • Directional Wave • MORAY 1+ acoustic receiving array aux data: air & sea temp and sea surface elevation

  2. APL LEAR Deployments SMALLER SCALE VIEW 0.5 0 WHOI environmental mooring -0.5 U-Miami wave buoy -1 MORAY 1+ VLA/HLA Receiving Array -1.5 Y (km) -2 500 m APL-UW wave buoy -2.5 Track of the R/V Endeavor for internal wave & acoustic propagation study -3 Ship-deployed source location (via precise positioning of R/V Knorr) -3.5 -4 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 X (km)

  3. Shark 500 m 50 m 100 m 200 m 300 m 500 m 300o 1000 m 14 U Miami 1000 m 10 6 2 M1+ 15 11 7 3 1 5 9 13 A2 A1 1000 m 500 m 4 8 12 Basic Layout for MF measurements about the MORAY 1+ VLA/HLA system 16 B1 KEM 1000 B2

  4. 0m 50m 100m 200m 300m 25m 40m 80m 50m A B C D E F G H X Y BOTTOM REFLECTION X  Y : size of 1st Fresnel zone (m)

  5. SD: 40 m RD: 25 m 0 0.4 10 20 30 40 50 MF output (8-16 kHz) 60 70 -0.4 0 20 40 60 80 10 120 140 160 180 200 100 150 200 250 TIME (ms) RANGE (m) SD: 40 m RD: 50 m 0.4 0 10 20 30 40 50 MF output (8-16 kHz) 60 70 -0.4 0 20 40 60 80 10 120 140 160 180 200 100 150 200 250 TIME (ms) RANGE (m) C5 position (200 m range)

  6. SD: 40 m RD: 25 m 0.5 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 -0.5 80 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 TIME (ms) RANGE (m) SD: 40 m RD: 50 m 0 0.5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 -0.5 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 RANGE (m) TIME (ms) C13 position (300 m range)

  7. 20 20 1 kHz 10 kHz 14 15 15 10 10 10 BOTTOM LOSS 5 5 6 0 0 2 start -5 -5 M1+ 15 11 7 3 1 5 9 13 10 20 40 60 10 10 10 10 10 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 70 70 70 70 70 70 20 40 60 4 20 20 3 kHz 14 kHz 8 15 15 12 10 10 BOTTOM LOSS 5 5 16 0 0 -5 -5 20 40 60 20 40 60 20 20 6 kHz 20 kHz 15 15 10 10 BOTTOM LOSS 5 5 300o 0 0 -5 -5 20 40 60 20 40 60 GRAZING ANGLE (deg.) GRAZING ANGLE (deg.) C1  C13 direction

  8. 14 20 20 1 kHz 10 kHz 15 15 10 10 10 BOTTOM LOSS 6 5 5 2 start 0 0 M1+ 15 11 7 3 1 5 9 13 10 10 10 10 10 30 30 30 30 30 30 50 50 50 50 50 50 70 70 70 70 70 70 -5 -5 10 4 20 40 60 20 40 60 8 20 20 3 kHz 14 kHz 15 15 12 10 10 BOTTOM LOSS 16 5 5 0 0 -5 -5 20 40 60 20 40 60 20 20 6 kHz 20 kHz 15 15 10 10 BOTTOM LOSS 300o 5 5 0 0 -5 -5 20 40 60 20 40 60 GRAZING ANGLE (deg.) GRAZING ANGLE (deg.) C1  C13 direction C2  C14 direction

  9. Knorr move out at 0.1 m/s Continuous Angle Study Range: 50-300 m C2  C14 C1  C13 50 m 250 m Time (ms) C3  C15 C4  C16

  10. 20 2 kHz 15 10 BOTTOM LOSS (dB) 5 0 -5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 GRAZING ANGLE (deg.) M1-M13 direction M2-M14 direction 20 4 kHz 15 10 BOTTOM LOSS (dB) 5 0 -5 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 GRAZING ANGLE (deg.) Geoacoustic model for the site PE-derived bottom loss (Seattle 06 meeting) Water ~1485 m/s 1600 m/s 80 m 80.2 m 1720 m/s 81 m 1560 m/s 84.9 m 1750 m/s 95 m Half space 1900 m/s

  11. Studies on Sea Surface Boundary Effects

  12. Wave Conditions 10 August LF (swell) from the South HF (wind waves) from the East

  13. Shark 500 m 50 m 100 m 200 m 300 m 500 m 300o 1000 m 14 U Miami 1000 m 10 6 2 M1+ 15 11 7 3 1 5 9 13 A2 A1 1000 m 500 m 4 8 12 16 B1 DIFFERENT PROPAGATIONDIRECTIONS THROUGH THE DIRECTIONAL WAVE FIELD KEM 1000 B2

  14. Knock Down of Horizontal Spatial Coherence at High Sea State Horizontal Coherence Vertical Coherence 15 AUG 12m/s Coherence Magnitude 9 AUG 4m/s kD/2p kD/2p

  15. Energy loss due to near surface bubbles for single surface interaction at grazing angle 15o (Preliminary results—heavy averaging) Very interesting applied and basic implications…. > 10 kHz, ~3 dB Loss (dB) < 10 kHz, ~0 dB Frequency (kHz)

  16. The road ahead Key data needs: ASIS buoy and wind speed (to replace Knorr IMET) [Graber & Williams] bottom strategraphy, layering and roughness + cores in the central area [Tang, Goff, Turget, Wang] Mooring CTD in the central area (from “forest mooring”) [Duda et al.] Later on, surface modeling (to extend observations) [Plant’s model] First (three) lines of inquiry: -Towards one geoacoustic model for the Central Site consistent over LF-MF experimental groups -3D spatial coherence: role of sea surface, (use of small slope approx.) kH >> 1 roughness -Spatial coherence of bottom forward reflection and relation to kH<< 1 roughness

More Related