1 / 18

GM Check-Mate Development Framework Status and Future

GM Check-Mate Development Framework Status and Future. Shirish More Solutions Architect – Global General Motors Account Siemens PLM Software. 1. ABSTRACT.

thwaite
Download Presentation

GM Check-Mate Development Framework Status and Future

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. GM Check-Mate Development FrameworkStatus and Future Shirish More Solutions Architect – Global General Motors Account Siemens PLM Software 1

  2. ABSTRACT This presentation will address the challenge of developing, integrating and deploying Check-Mate checkers/profiles into GM Math Data Validation processes.

  3. General Motors Validation Facts Check-Mate as globally agreed upon CAD validation tool Successfully implemented Check-Mate at all GM Global Sites Enforced 53 Check-Mate Checkers as part of GM workflow Check-Mate used as CAD Data Assessment Tool More than 200,000 NX parts assessed weekly using check-mate batch mode Significant improvement in Math data quality

  4. GM Quick Validation RoadmapTo Achieve CAD Data Quality CURRENT STATE FUTURE STATE Design Function Checks (RDDV) Fabrication Process Checks Modeling Best Practice Checks Geometry Integrity Checks File Organization Checks Phase2 Phase1 Phase3 Phase4 Phase5 Value (Time\Cost\Quality) Scope

  5. Simple GM Validation Workflow Designer Create Item Revisionin Teamcenter Design in NX Release in Tc Execute Check-Matein NX

  6. Validation Technology GMNA – DCS File Checker (Mostly File Organization Checks) GME – SQS/DQS (Mostly Structure / Data Checks) Retiring different GM custom validation tools at different regional sites Accepted Solution Check-Mate as globally agreed upon CAD validation tool Challenge Advantages • Validation framework that is supported, enhanced and maintained by Siemens • Better error reporting (tree structure, failed objects, external log files) • Performs Validation on Assemblies/Folders (Native and Teamcenter) • Check-Mate execution from command line

  7. Business Processes Checks Vs. Workflow Different checks required at different sites for releasing data Accepted Solution “Global Quality Seal” Profile consisting 53 globally agreed upon checkers (File Organization and Data Structure Checkers to begin with ) Challenge Advantages • CAD Data validated to globally agreed upon GM data creation standards • Smooth data sharing between global sites • Global regions now speak same validation language

  8. Integration with Teamcenter • Enforcement • Saving Checking Results • (Teamcenter/NX ?) • Teamcenter Groups and Checking Results? • Importing Native CAD Data and Validation Results? Challenge • Accepted Solutionand Advantages • Check-Mate results are saved in NX part file and in Teamcenter • Different groups can execute different Profiles and still can be enforced using Tc XML rule file • With Tc 2007.1 validation can be performed from Tc product structure editor • NX 5 now will create validation objects when native data is imported to Tc

  9. Tc Validation Results SummaryExample Status Result NX Dataset Checker/Profile Class Name

  10. Generic Validation Rule Set ContentExample • Tc Group • Owning Group of the Item Revision • “All, All-Except, None, None-Except” logic • Dataset Type • Dataset type to Validate • Profiles to validate/acceptable results • Profile Name: Passed/Run

  11. Teamcenter Rule File ItemsExample • Baseline Rule File Item: • AKP62495 • All WIP Item Revisions validated to same checks • Hard Release Rule File Item: • AKP86750 • WIP Item Revisions can be validated to different checks based upon Owning Group of Item Revision and Dataset Type • Replicated to the following sites: • GMTG_Production, GMPT_Production, GMSA, ISUZU_Production, GMM_Production, GM_Suzuki, Holden_Prod, JCI_Warren, IMC-141231374, Torrance, GMB-S.CAETANO, GMCL-REC_Production, FCA_HF_Production, SaabTDC1, GMPTE, GMDAT, EDAG_GME, Manuf_Production, GM-Strasbourg, GMIDEL_Production (Master in SCG001)

  12. Check-Mate Performance Checking Time + Result Display Time Check-Mate checking time is on higher side as compared to our legacy NX/Open validation tools Challenge • Accepted Solution (Functional and Core Architecture) • Set environment variables that limits display of failed objects in check-mate results window • UGCHECKMATE_MAX_DISPLAY_ENTITIES • UGCHECKMATE_MAX_LOG_ENTITIES • Skip “read-only/released” NX part from checking • Skip part files having check-mate flag PASS and Up-To-Date • Set environment variable that will not bring-up results window when checking is complete • UGII_CHECKMATE_AUTO_SHOW_RESULTS

  13. GM Check-MateCoding Framework - Current Enforced Profiles NX 3.0.5 Adhoc Profiles/Checkers GM Check-Mate Profiles Core and GM Specific Check-Mate Checkers Core and GM Specific Check-Mate Routines NX/Open + KF NX Core

  14. GM Check-MateCoding Framework - Future Enforced Profiles NX 5+ Adhoc Profiles/Checkers GM Check-Mate Profiles/Checkers GM Specific Check-Mate Routines KF API .NET API C++ API Open C API Common API NX Core

  15. GM Check-Mate Profile/CheckerHierarchy – Conceptual Plan Group Specific Checking NX Check-Mate Rule Set NX Roles and Math Maturity Top Level GM Check-Mate Profile PT IDENTIFIER Interior RULE Exterior Chassis AVDC HVAC Styling 1 2 3 4 5 6 7

  16. GM Validation Future Development Plans Implement Check-Mate override capability in GM workflow Enforce RDDV checks Job Scheduler and Check-Mate batch-mode checking

  17. GM Check-Mate DEMO

  18. Questions 18

More Related