440 likes | 529 Views
Multi-Market Service Firms. Antoine Gervais University of Notre Dame J. Bradford Jensen McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University Peterson Institute for International Economics NBER. Background / Context.
E N D
Multi-Market Service Firms Antoine Gervais University of Notre Dame J. Bradford Jensen McDonough School of Business, Georgetown University Peterson Institute for International Economics NBER
Background / Context • We have learned a great deal over the past 15 years regarding the role of firms in international trade • New areas of research being opened up by incorporation of transaction level trade data to economic census data • One shortcoming is the vast majority of the research to date has focused on goods • I have devoted a significant share of my time over the past 5 years to examining the prospects of analyzing trade in services
Composition of U.S. Employment, 2007 Source: 2007 Economic Census and Census of Governments
Business and Personal Services Source: U.S. Census Bureau
How are services traded? • Modes of service trade: • Mode 1 – Cross-border provision, e.g. software produced in one region and shipped via internet to another region • Mode 2 – Consumption abroad, e.g. consumer travels to resort to consume service • Mode 3 – Commercial presence in foreign region, e.g. restaurant opens local branch to serve foreign demand • Mode 4 – Temporary movement of natural persons, e.g. consultant travels to customer to deliver services
How are services traded? • Modes of service trade: • Mode 1 – Cross-border provision, e.g. software produced in one region and shipped via internet to another region • Mode 2 – Consumption abroad, e.g. consumer travels to resort to consume service • Mode 3 – Commercial presence in foreign region, e.g. restaurant opens local branch to serve foreign demand • Mode 4 – Temporary movement of natural persons, e.g. consultant travels to customer to deliver services
Previous Work on Trade in Services • Jensen and Kletzer (2006), Jensen (forthcoming), and Gervais and Jensen (on-going) • Exploit mismatch of production and consumption to identify activities that can be provided at a distance • Quick summary of findings: • A significant share of employment is in tradable service activities • These activities are qualitatively different from non-tradable services and manufacturing • The empirical results have important implications for US comparative advantage and US trade policy
How are services traded? • Modes of service trade: • Mode 1 – Cross-border provision, e.g. software produced in one region and shipped via internet to another region • Mode 2 – Consumption abroad, e.g. consumer travels to resort to consume service • Mode 3 – Commercial presence in foreign region, e.g. restaurant opens local branch to serve foreign demand • Mode 4 – Temporary movement of natural persons, e.g. consultant travels to customer to deliver services
Headquarters and FDI • “Classic” question • Early focus on “horizontal” FDI, but literature moves on to “vertical” FDI • Caves (1971), Hymer (1976), and Dunning (1977) • Helpman (1984), Markusen (1984) • Antras (2003) • Limited empirical analysis • Brainard (1993), Yeaple (2003) • Hanson, Mataloni, Slaughter (2005) • Nunn and Trefler (2008), Bernard, Jensen, Redding, and Schott (2010) • Desai, Foley, and Hines (2009)
Overview • Consider the relationship between headquarters activity and multi-market operation (FDI) in the service sector • Develop a model of market seeking entry in the face of prohibitive trade costs for final output • Firms choose level of headquarters activity and number of markets • Focus on non-tradables, but interested in potential for trade policy to affect employment in U.S. via headquarters supporting FDI • Identify industries where FDI is likely • Investigate relationship between FDI and headquarters • Hope ultimately (not here today) to estimate domestic headquarters employment impact of increased FDI
Empirical Approach • International FDI data shortcomings • Use detailed microdata on the wholesale, retail, and service sectors collected by the U.S. Census Bureau • Domestic data, but mechanism similar to FDI • Investigate: • Prevalence of/relationship between multi-market and headquarters activity • Changes over time • Industry and firm level relationships
Preview of Findings • Significant variation in headquarters and multi-market activity across industries and firms within industries • Positive correlation between headquarters activity and multi-market firms across industries • Positive correlation between industry characteristics and increases in number of markets firms operate in • Firm HQ activity positively associated with firms’ number of markets and increases in firms’ number of markets
Data • Economic Census data for 1987, 1997 • Census of Services • Census of Wholesale • Census of Retail • Headquarters Activities • Census of Auxiliaries 1987
Data Issues • Census of Manufactures • Firm ownership • Location • Industry classification • Employment • Payroll • Revenue • Non-production/ production • Capital stock by type • Materials, energy inputs • Periodic information on other inputs (technology…) • Census of Services • Firm ownership • Location • Industry classification • Employment • Payroll • Revenue
Data Issues • Industry Classification changes • Restricts us to 1987 to 1997 (both available on 1987 SIC basis) • Finance, Insurance, and Real Estate sector and Telecommunications and Broadcasting industries not included in 1987 Economic Census
Measures • Measures of number of markets: • Number of BEA labor market areas (183 regions) • Number of establishments • HQ activity measures • Total firm headquarters activity allocated across industries based on an industry’s share of firm revenue • Headquarters dummy • Other inputs = Revenue – Payroll • Very large number of very small service producers • To construct industry level measures and to characterize firm characteristics, use revenue weighted means • Cross-industry and regression results are un-weighted
Change over Time • Take information and communications technology changes as a “general purpose technology” • Decrease in cost of opening/managing affiliates • Related literature on growth of national retail chains • Basker (2005) • Foster, Haltiwanger, and Krizan (2006) • Jarmin, Klimek, and Miranda (2009)
Model • Develop a simple general equilibrium model of the decision to enter new markets. • We assume that the final “output” of the firm is nontradable – to serve additional consumers firms need to enter new markets. • We assume that firms can make investments in an asset that is non-rivalrous within the firm. • Firms endogenously choose the optimal level of headquarters services and the number of locations in which to operate, conditional on demand characteristics and cost of managing multiple establishments.
Preliminary Conclusions • Significant variation in headquarters and multi-market activity across industries and firms within industries • Positive correlation between headquarters activity and multi-market firms across industries and increases in number of markets • Firm HQ activity positively associated with firms’ number of markets and increases in firms’ number of markets • Approach holds promise for investigating effect of increased liberalization of FDI on US employment
Geographic Concentration of Industries Mfg EMP – 86% T Ag/Min EMP – 100% T Prof Svc EMP – 70% T Ed/Health EMP – 98% N-T Oth Svc EMP – 80% N-T Source: Jensen and Kletzer (2006)
Tradable Services are Different Source: Author’s calculations, 2007 American Community Survey
Potential Labor Market Impact Source: Author’s calculation using 2007 County Business Patterns data.