1 / 15

Some legal issues of virtual organisations: the MARVIN experience

Some legal issues of virtual organisations: the MARVIN experience. Emily M. Weitzenböck Institutt for Rettsinformatikk University of Oslo. Approach. What is a Virtual Enterprise (VE)? Types of business structures: organisational forms Legal classification

thyra
Download Presentation

Some legal issues of virtual organisations: the MARVIN experience

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Some legal issues of virtual organisations: the MARVIN experience Emily M. Weitzenböck Institutt for Rettsinformatikk University of Oslo

  2. Approach • What is a Virtual Enterprise (VE)? • Types of business structures: organisational forms • Legal classification • The MARitime VIrtual enterprise Network (MARVIN) Project • Description of this VE network • Some legal issues that arise

  3. What is a Virtual Enterprise (VE)? • Much discussion on definition of VE • Working definition: • “A virtual enterprise is a co-operation form of legally independent enterprises, institutions and/or individuals, that produce a service on the basis of a common business understanding. The co-operating units participate in the horizontal and/or the vertical collaboration with their core competencies and appear to third parties as a homogeneous enterprise. Furthermore the institutionalisation of central management functions for design, management and development of the Virtual Enterprise are extensively abandoned and the necessary demand for co-ordination and harmonisation is covered by appropriate information and communication systems. The Virtual Enterprise is connected to a mission and ends with this mission.” • (Arnold et al.)

  4. General Characteristics of a VE • Complementary core competencies - the sharing of resources • Geographical dispersion of activities • Changing participants • Participant equality • Electronic communication

  5. Reasons for emergence of VE • Flexibility • Necessary because of increased changeability of the business environment • Separate organisations do not have necessary scale & depend on collaboration • Efficiency • Collaboration important to be able to react to the demands of the business and market environment • Sharing resources = better use of scale & experience  increase in efficiency • Carrying out activities together enhances risk spreading & risk reduction

  6. Characteristics of the two types of VE

  7. Types of network organisations

  8. Advantages of using ICT • Facilitates communication between the VE members  increases efficiency + flexibility of VE • In a stable VE: • Electronic Commerce acts as a distribution channel for the distribution of goods & services between the VE & its clients • In a dynamic VE: • Electronic Commerce functions as a sort of market place between the parties forming part of the VE and the public at large

  9. Business structures - Legal Classification • The main business structures used throughout Europe: • Sole trader • Partnership/civil law partnership • Limited liability company • Consortium • Joint venture

  10. Relations between the client & service providers • Some possible configurations: • User contracts with each enterprise: • no one guarantees performance of the whole project to client • One main contractor with a number of sub-contracts: • main contractor responsible for the whole project  Risk assessment • Service providers team together to provide the service, e.g. consortium agreement: • liability shared • provide one face to the customer

  11. The MARVIN Project • Collaboration between 10 partners from 4 European countries • Some of the tasks: • Develop software toolkit: • Development of a software tool - the Maritime enterprise integration tool (MEIT) - based on Internet technology, to model, facilitate and co-ordinate the interaction between companies forming a virtual organisation in the maritime industry • Examine two scenarios: • Emergency repair following a ship casualty • Routine Maintenance of a ship • Examine legal framework for running the maritime VE

  12. MARVIN - Emergency Response Scenario • Client: • Ship owner/ ship manager • Service Providers: • Emergency-Response Company • Tug Company • Classification Society • Shipyard • Hull Insurer • P&I Club • Marvin participants: • - Classification societies: DNV, GL • - ER-Service: GL • - Ship manager: Marenostrum • - Shipyards: Lisnave, Neorion • - Universities: IST, IWI, LMS, IRI

  13. MARVIN - The software tool • Software tool accessible via Internet … • … to registered users • Registration form for all entities who are interested to: • offer their services, e.g. ship repair yards, classification societies, ER-companies, etc. • use services (i.e. ER & maintenance) on offer: shipowner, ship manager

  14. Characteristics of the VE in MARVIN • Characteristics: • The VE is formed specifically at the order of the client (shipowner/ship manager) • Some members of the loose “organisation” unite to provide the service depending on various factors; others do not • The objects of this VE, once created, are extremely limited & last until the service is completed • The association created is an “ad hoc” one • Distinguish between: • The MARVIN Tool: registration, information, links to other sites, etc. • Creation of the VE upon request by client (casualty, routine maintenance) - the partners are selected with the assistance of the MARVIN Tool, and the VE is formed

  15. MARVIN - Some legal issues • FOCUS: Emergency Repair Scenario • APPROACH: Examination of the relationship between: • the users and the MEIT: confidentiality and other security concerns • the tool developers and the users - MEIT as a product: contractual concerns • the users between themselves: special maritime contracts

More Related