1 / 19

Julie-Anne Mee The Australian Centre for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies 13 November, 2008

0. Moving closer to a sector specific regulatory framework – solving the Australian not-for-profit accounting muddle. Julie-Anne Mee The Australian Centre for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies 13 November, 2008 Perth CPA Not-for-profit Conference. Today ….

tibor
Download Presentation

Julie-Anne Mee The Australian Centre for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies 13 November, 2008

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. 0 Moving closer to a sector specific regulatory framework – solving the Australian not-for-profit accounting muddle. Julie-Anne Mee The Australian Centre for Philanthropy and Nonprofit Studies 13 November, 2008 Perth CPA Not-for-profit Conference

  2. Today … • Apples and Pears - Standard Chart of Accounts • Cutting to the Core - Reducing the Costs of Government imposed paperwork

  3. Standardisation • Standardisation best described by its benefits • Consistency • Comparability • Sectoral coordination • Communication and discussion • Better info for decision makers • Simpler reporting (by preparers) • Accountability • Robustness

  4. Accounting Template • 2002 – 2004: collation of data from Queensland government agencies about grants. • 2004 – 2006: collaborative development of a Standard Chart of Accounts (SCOA) for Queensland • 2nd – 3rd ¼ 2006: training and implementation of SCOA in QLD government funders and nonprofit recipient organisations

  5. Accounting Template • 1st – 2nd ¼ 2007: collation of data from New South Wales government agencies about grants and collaborative development of SCOA (using QLD as base platform) • 3rd ¼ 2007: training and implementation of SCOA in NSW funders and recipient organisations • 2006 - 2007: discussions with Federal agencies with FaCSIA as lead agency.

  6. Accounting Template • 2007: discussions with Western Australian human services departments • 2007: participation in the Victorian Review of Not-for-Profit Regulation activities and report issued • Late 2007: initial discussions with Tasmanian, South Australian and New Zealand human services departments • Late 2007: updated Queensland SCOA using learnings from New South Wales implementation

  7. Accounting Template • 2008: Victorian Action Plan developed after review with project team being assembled during final quarter to implement during early - mid 2009. • 2008: Western Australia Human Services Roundtable endorsement for the Department for Communities to undertake a SCOA project with implementation being recommended during 2009/10 – currently in the middle of this • Senate Economic Committee Inquiry – contributions and review.

  8. Advantages of a Standard Chart of Accounts • Consistent and uniform reporting; • True financial performance can be ascertained; • Assists auditors in the annual audit; • Clear guidelines for account names; • Incoming treasurers and bookkeepers have a framework; and • Enables benchmarking and development of KPI’s

  9. Financial Reporting Standards and Next Phases • In Australia – sector or transaction neutrality – AASB • Senate Economic Enquiry review • National approach • Funding acquittals align with standards • Accounting and auditing profession engage with nonprofit sector • Appropriate financial literacy training for nonprofit boards and staff rolls out • Research is supported about impact of nonprofit financial performance (eg benchmarking and KPIs)

  10. Sample page in SCOA

  11. Sample page in SCOA

  12. Links for use • CPNS website: http://www.bus.qut.edu.au/research/cpns/ • CPNS wiki space: https://wiki.qut.edu.au/display/CPNS/CPNS+Wiki+Home • WIKI space – Develop Your Organisation (DYO): https://wiki.qut.edu.au/display/CPNS/DYO+Home • WIKI space - DYO – Standard Chart of Accounts (SCOA): https://wiki.qut.edu.au/display/CPNS/Standard+Chart+of+Accounts • WA Wiki specific: https://wiki.qut.edu.au/display/CPNS/Western+Australia

  13. Cutting to the Core - Reducing Red Tape • CPNS web site • Summary • http://www.bus.qut.edu.au/research/cpns/documents/2008_4PaperworkReportingCostsofGovtGrants.pdf • Full Paper • Electronic copies of CPNS Working Paper 39: How Long is a Piece of Red Tape? The Paperwork Reporting Costs of Government Grants is available from • http://eprints.qut.edu.au/archive/00012986/

  14. 0 Compliance Costs • Compliance Pilot Survey • For a one year period, the project surveyed 20 nonprofit organisations on their compliance costs in formulating submissions, reporting, and other government paperwork. • Variations in size, purpose & multiple funders • NPOs kept a log of all government documentation and further 2 page survey. • 14 NPOs remained for the whole 12 months.

  15. 0 Summary Over the 12 months: An average of 143.57 hours (median of 95 hours) to complete government generated paperwork. Average time taken per form was 5.05 hours, but with a median of 1.00 hour. Pre Survey views: Estimates were much higher and this has implications for government red tape review

  16. The fourteen NPOs completed: • 46 grant submissions (on average taking 15.17 hours to prepare); • 157 grant acquittals (average 6.04 hours per acquittal); • 90 tax forms (average 1.87 hours per form); and • 111 ‘other’ forms, e.g. database information on client services for Health or Disability departments (average 1.88 hours). • Grant submissions and acquittals, together made up just over 50% of all compliance paperwork for NPOs.

  17. Form Issues • Less than 50% of forms had instructions/guides • Only one third provided a contact point • Limited use of external advisors to complete forms • Time constraints in appln. & external audit issues

  18. 0 Department Analysis

  19. Some Suggestions…. • Whole of Government data dictionary • Collect data once • Data collected should be either useful or returned as useful information • Communication about the fate and reasons of failed submissions needs improvement • Include adequate instructions and a contact point . • One size does not fit all • Government should examine its funding submission processes • Further research on benefits of red tape reduction measures • Further quantitative research is required into the burdens and benefits of statutory mandated quality accreditation processes • Further research into the non-paperwork burden of government regulation.

More Related