1 / 34

Update on FY12 Achievement Levels and FY12 School Grading Rules

Update on FY12 Achievement Levels and FY12 School Grading Rules. CAO November 8, 2011. Developing FCAT 2.0 and Algebra 1 EOC Achievement Levels. Panels Educator proposed Reactor reviewed Commissioner proposes Draft Rule State Board Action - December. New FCAT 2.0 Levels for SDPBC.

tilden
Download Presentation

Update on FY12 Achievement Levels and FY12 School Grading Rules

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Update on FY12 Achievement Levelsand FY12 School Grading Rules CAO November 8, 2011

  2. Developing FCAT 2.0 and Algebra 1 EOC Achievement Levels • Panels • Educator proposed • Reactor reviewed • Commissioner proposes Draft Rule • State Board Action - December

  3. New FCAT 2.0 Levels for SDPBC

  4. FY2011 Reading Proficiency +Using FCAT and FCAT 2.0 Levels

  5. FY2011 Reading Proficiency +Using FCAT and FCAT 2.0 Levels -15 +16

  6. FY2011 Math Proficiency +Using FCAT and FCAT 2.0 Levels -22

  7. New Algebra I EOC Levelsfor SDPBC

  8. SDPBC FY2011 Algebra I EOCPercent Level 3+ 74%

  9. Developing FCAT 2.0 and Algebra 1 EOC Achievement Levels • Next Steps • Commissioner proposes Draft Rule

  10. FY2011 Average NAEP Score: Florida Grade 4 Grade 8 Reading: > 9 states 30%: prof./adv. Math: > 8 states 28%: prof./adv. • Reading: > 28 states • 35%: prof./adv. • Math: > 13 states • 37%: prof./adv.

  11. ReadingLevel 3 and Above in Florida

  12. Developing FCAT 2.0 and Algebra 1 EOC Achievement Levels • State Board Action - December

  13. FY12 School Grading Rules

  14. FDOE Still DeterminingFY12 School Grading Rules, including More Weight on Reading Learning gains for level 1 and 2 students EOCs AYP Flexibility Waiver Points for School Grades

  15. Context for School AccountabilitySome Areas of Concern for House Committees and State Board • Reading performance levels for schools graded “C” or higher • Percentage of “A” and “B”schools

  16. Rule 6A-1.00981, FAC., • If percentage of “A” or “B,” reaches or exceeds 75%, in the following year the school grade points would be increased. • Review starts based on FY12 school grades and could impact FY13 school grading scale

  17. Raising Standards and Higher Accountability Lead to Improved Student Performance

  18. Developing FY12 School Grading Rules • Commissioner proposes Draft Rule • State Board Action - February

  19. Implications for Today • DK FY12 achievement levels • Likely • More “F’ schools • Less “A” schools • What can you do? • Continuously improve instruction • Student by student • Teacher by teacher

  20. CORE K12

  21. National Center for Educational Assessment Practices of High-Performing School Districts School District of Palm Beach County Provides Low Performing Districts Provide High Performing Districts Provide State: Assessment State: Assessment FCAT 2.0 A s s e s s District: Benchmark Assessments C O R E K 1 2 Baseline and Mid-year Diagnostics Align & Plan Mini Assessments - AKA (IBMs) School:Unit Tests Daily Monitoring, including item banks Teacher:Daily Monitoring Teacher:Daily Monitoring

  22. National Center for Educational Assessment Practices of High-Performing School Districts Did students progress or meet/exceed proficiency standard? FCAT 2.0 C O R E K 1 2 Baseline and Mid-year Diagnostics • Is student classroom performance aligned with levels of performance? • What is student level of performance? Mini Assessments - AKA (IBMs) • Are students learning the benchmarks? Daily Monitoring, including item banks • Are students learning • While I am teaching? • After I taught?

  23. Differentiated AccountabilityFLORIDA’S CONTINUOUS IMPROVEMENT MODEL • The district must prescribe interim (Benchmark baseline, mid-year, and mini) assessments in R, W, M, and S for Level 1-3 students. • The district must ensure real-time access to student achievement data.

  24. What’s in CORE K12

  25. Diagnostic Assessments in CORE K12 • Fall and Winter • Reading (4) • Grade 6 • Grade 10 • Retakes for SSS and NGSSS • Mathematics (3) • Algebra 1 • Geometry • Retake for SSS • Science (1) • Biology

  26. Mini Assessments – IBMs in CORE K12

  27. Mini Assessments – IBMs in CORE K12

  28. Item Banks in CORE K-12 • School/teacher create tests • Florida item bank (36,894 items) • FCAT Test Maker Item Bank(16,550 items) • Reading • Math • Algebra 1 • Geometry • Science • Biology

  29. Real-time Reports Track Student Benchmark Performance and Progress • Administrator • School, class and student • Usage by teachers and students • Teacher • Class and students • Student

  30. Instructional Resources • Over 12,000 Aligned Skill Resources • Teachers • Lesson resources, classroom activities • Student and Parent • At-home activities • Integrated with reports

  31. Benefits Administrator and Teacher • Select aligned mini-assessments • Create aligned assessments • Access reports immediately • Track student benchmark performance & progress

  32. Benefits Students and Parents Access reports and resources Experience computer-based testing

  33. Summary • Continue to improve instructional practices by helping your teachers • Implement Marzano’s system • Use best tools available • District helps you help your teachers

  34. Moral of the Story

More Related