210 likes | 229 Views
Chapter 2 Leading Strategically Through Effective Vision and Mission. OBJECTIVES. Explain how strategic leadership is essential to strategy formulation and implementation. 1. Understand the relationships among vision, mission, values and strategy. 2. 3.
E N D
Chapter 2Leading Strategically Through Effective Vision and Mission
OBJECTIVES • Explain how strategic leadership is essential to strategy formulation and implementation 1 • Understand the relationships among vision, mission, values and strategy 2 3 • Understand the roles of vision and mission in deter-mining strategic purpose and strategic coherence • Identify a firm’s stakeholders and explain why this identification is critical to effective strategy formulation and implementation 4
PULLING A $15 BILLION COW OUT OF A DITCH • Xerox reaches profitability • Mulcahy takes • over, Aug 2001 • The fall from the nifty 50 • She leads a turnaround • Xerox introduces the Xerox 914 copier in 1959. This copier transformed the workplace. • Xerox was charter member of the “nifty 50”– the 50 stocks most favored by institutional investors. • Since 1970s, Xerox had been crippled by competition, mostly Japanese. • October 2001, Xerox reports first quarterly loss in16 years. Mulcahy is not obvious choice for top position. • Lacks product development and financial expertise • Chosen because board has confidence in her “strategic mind” • Refines Xerox vision and reminds people of core values • Aligns operation with the refined mission and values • Sells Xerox’s China and Hong Kong operations and half of stake in joint venture with Fuji • Closes down inkjet business • Annual expenses cut by $1.7 billion • Sold $2.3 billion worth of non-core assets • Long-term debt reduced from $15.6 billion to $9.2 billion • Xerox returns to profitability in 2002, generating $1.9 billion in operating cash flow and $91 million in net income on $15.8 billion in sales
STRATEGIC LEADERSHIP • Leadership • Strategic leadership • The task of exerting influence on other people’s pursuit of goals in an organizational context • Managing an overall enterprise and influencing key organizational outcomes, such as company-wide performance, competitive superiority, innovation, strategic change, and survival
Interpersonal roles • Figurehead • Leader • Liaison • Informational roles • Monitor • Disseminator • Spokesperson • Decision roles • Entrepreneur • Disturbance handler • Resource allocator • Negotiator TOP EXECUTIVE ROLES • Formal authority and status Source: Mintzberg, 1973
LEVEL 5 LEADERS • Capabilities • Build greatness through combination of will and modesty • Level 5leaders • Lead a group to superior levels of performance • Level 4 leaders • Organize people and resources to accomplish predetermined objectives • Level 3 leaders • Work effectively with others as a member of a team to achieve group objectives • Level 2 leaders • Make individual contributions through talent and work ethic • Source: Collins, Good to Great, 2001. • Level 1 leaders
TWO ATTRIBUTES OF LEVEL 5 LEADERS • Being someone who • prefers to share credit rather than hog it, • tends to shun public attention, • acts with calm determination, and • exercises ambition on the company’s behalf rather than one’s own • The ability to translate strategic intent into the resolve needed to pursue a strategy • …and usually to make hard choices over a period of time • Professional will • Professional modesty
WHAT DOES IT TAKE TO BE A CEO? • An Ivy League MBA? • Charisma? • There is little consensuson whether personality or background matters more • International management experience? • Integrity?
Personality differences • Personality or psychological determinants of strategic leadership: • Locus of control • Need for achievement • Tolerance for risk or ambiguity • Charisma and emotional intelligence • Personality characteristics may be important; defining and isolating leadership abilities is difficult. LEADERSHIP CHARACTERISTICS • Background and demographic differences • Differences in competence and action • Background: • Work experience • Education • Demographics: • Gender • Nationality • Race • Religion • Network ties • The profile of leaders is changing (e.g., greater diversity among top management teams) • Increasing value placed on substantive work experience • Evidence of being a strategic leader as important indicator of leadership potential • –someone who not only works to develop a plan, but also to empower the organization to realize the vision behind it
1 • Responds to a complex and changing environment 2 • Can manage the needs of interdependent but often diverse units, arenas, or functional areas 3 • Develops a coherent plan for executive succession CRITERIA OF AN EFFECTIVE TOP-MANAGEMENT TEAM
A simple statement or under-standing of what the firm willbe in the future. A statementof vision is forward looking and identifies the firm’s desiredlong-term status. • Vision • A declaration of what a firm is and stands for – of its fundamental values and purpose • Mission VISION AND MISSION • Firms with clearly and widely understood visions and missions find it easier to make strategic decisions that entail difficult trade-offs
VISION, MISSION, AND STRATEGY • Strategy • The central, integrated, externally-oriented concept of how the firm will achieve its objectives. Consists of 5 elements: arenas, vehicles, differentiators, staging, and economic logic • Vision and Mission • Strategic Goals and Objectives • Fundamental purpose • Values • View of future • Specific targets • Measurable outcomes
VISION – USES OF AMBITION AND AMBIGUITY • Sony’s vision in early 1950s: • “becoming the company that most changes the worldwide image of Japanese products as being of poor quality.” • Vision statements • Express long-term action horizons • Are ambitious and force the firm to stretch • Ambiguity allows flexibility for changing strategy or implementation tactics • CitiBank’s vision in 1915: • “the most powerful, the most serviceable, the most far-reaching world financial institution the world has ever seen.”
IBM will not be split up and its many parts will be even more closely coordinated. • IBM will reassert its identity as customers’ primary computing resource. • The company will be the dominant supplier of technology in the industry. • PowerPC, a new microprocessor design, will be IBM’s centerpiece. Built into many future computers, it will run a wide range of standard industry software. It will steeply cut manufacturing costs. • Mainframes are no longer central to the strategy, but IBM will still make them, now with microprocessors. • IBM is its own worst enemy. Employees must waste fewer opportunities, minimize bureaucracy, and put the good of the company before their division’s. GERSTNER’S 1993 VISION FOR IBM
Wal-Mart • Grow sales and profits by 70% per year • Ryanair • Be Europe’s largest airline in 7 years • Matsushita • To become a “super manufacturing company” VISION ANCHORED IN GOALS AND OBJECTIVES • Vision • Examples • Goalsand objectives
To crystallize and disseminate the firm’s strategy among employees • To provide a shared logic for the firm’s view of its internal and external environments and of its treatment of stakeholders • To galvanize concerted strategic action • To link strategy formulation to implementation by tying vision and mission to specific and measurable goals and objectives REASONS TO CRAFT CLEAR VISIONS AND MISSIONS
A conventional manufacturing company • A 21st century “Super manufacturing company” • Role • Provide goods • Provide solutions • Expansion of R&D, marketing, and IT • Investment • Principally capital STRATEGIC PURPOSE AT MATSUSHITA • Goal: • To become a 21st century “Super manufacturing company” • Today • Tomorrow
Arenas • Strategic coherence is • The symmetrical co-alignment of the five elements of a firm’s strategy • The congruence of policies in each function (e.g., finance, production, marketing) with these elements • The overarching fit of various businesses under the corporate umbrella • Economic logic • Staging • Vehicles • Differentiators STRATEGIC COHERENCE • Congruence
PERFORMANCE METRICS • Some financial and non-financial performance metrics • Financial performance metrics • Non-financial performance metrics • Return on sales • Return on assets • Return on equity • Sales per employee • Sales growth • Inventory turns • Accounts receivable turns • Debt ratio • Current ratio • Cost reduction • Customer retention • Customer satisfaction • Customer complaints • Employee turnover • Product returns • Product quality • Patents • New products released • Product development speed • Reputation • Web traffic
After identifying stakeholders, ask • Have we identified any vulnerable points in either the strategy or its potential implementation? • Which groups are mobilized and active in promoting their interests? • Have we identified supporters and opponents of the strategy? • Which groups will benefit from successful execution of the strategy and which may be adversely affected? • Where are various groups located? Who belongs to them, and who represents them? • Steps in identifyingstakeholders • Determine influences on strategy formulation decisions • Determine stake-holders’ power and influence over strategy execution decisions • Determine the effects of strategic decisions STAKEHOLDER ANALYSIS • Stakeholders Individuals or groups that have an interest in an organization’s ability to deliver intended results and maintain the viability of its products and services
1 • Explain how strategic leadership is essential tostrategy formulation and implementation 2 • Understand the relationships among vision, mission, values, and strategy 3 • Understand the roles of vision and mission in deter-mining strategic purpose and strategic coherence 4 • Identify a firm’s stakeholders and explain why this identification is critical to effective strategy formulation and implementation SUMMARY