620 likes | 798 Views
AgTM 405. “Correlation of Yield Maps with Infrared Photography”. AgTM 405 Precision Farming Unit. The Advantages of Infrared Photography Correlated to Yield Maps. Shows potential yield reduction due to irrigation, soil type or fertility problems
E N D
“Correlation of Yield Maps with Infrared Photography” AgTM 405 Precision Farming Unit
The Advantages of Infrared Photography Correlated to Yield Maps • Shows potential yield reduction due to irrigation, soil type or fertility problems • Helps in diagnosing combine monitoring errors that show up on yield maps • Low cost - less than $.50 per acre
Madison Farms • 3rd generation farm since 1914 • 15,000 acre farm • Crops grown include: Alfalfa, Canola, Corn, Buckwheat, Wheat, Potatoes, & Peas • 6,479 irrigated acres • Desert acres applied with bio-solids from Portland metro areas • Employs 18-24 people
Early Season Infrared - C17 • Picture taken on August 11, 1997
Early Season Infrared - C17 • Small future yield changes starting to show up
Early Season Infrared - C17 • Infrared with yield contour lines overlaid
Mid-Season Infrared - C17 • Picture taken on August 23, 1997 • Yield changes become less noticeable
Late Season Infrared - C17 • Picture Taken on Sept 4, 1997
Raw Yield Data - C17 • Yield decrease in Northwest corner
Raw Yield Data - C17 • Pivot road and planter skip
Raw Yield Data - C17 • Yield monitor malfunction
Average and Contour - C17 • After average and contour yield decreases show up the same as monitor malfunctions
Early Season Infrared - C3 • Picture taken August 11, 1997 • No center ring showing up
Infrared with Contours - C3 • Infrared not showing a yield reduction on the West side
Late Season Infrared with Contours - C3 • Picture taken September 4, 1997 • Center ring showing up
Late Season Infrared - C3 • Center ring showing up • Ring caused by rotator sprinkler pressure set to high causing leaf damage to corn crop
Late Season Infrared with Contours - C3 • Picture taken September 4, 1997 • Noticeable ring showing up in the center of the circle
Raw Combine Data - C3 • One of the two combine’s yield monitors was not working correctly
Raw Combine Data - C3 • Slight center ring yield reduction showing up at harvest time
Raw Combine Data - C3 • Slight center ring yield reduction showing up at harvest time.
Average and Contour - C3 • Assumed low yield on West side • No center ring showing up
Infrared - C53 • Sand ridge shows up in the infrared
Infrared - C53 • Outer edge of the circle shows up in the infrared
Infrared with Contour Lines C53 • Yield contour lines show the sandy ridge and the reduction in yield
Raw Data - C53 • The sandy ridge and the outer edge both show a yield reduction
Average and Contour - C53 • Sand ridge shows yield reduction
Average and Contour - C53 • Outer ring of the circle shows yield reduction
Infrared - C55 • Infrared shows the future area of low yields located on the sandy ridge
Infrared - C55 • Infrared shows no future reduction in yield at this spot
Infrared with Contours - C55 • Yield map contours and the infrared show the same location for yield reduction
Infrared with Contours - C55 • Yield map contours and the infrared do not show the same location for yield reduction
Average and Contour - C55 • Large yield reduction in the Northeast corner • Center pivot reversed before the reverse stops
Raw Data - C55 • Combine monitor error shows an assumed low yield at arrow
Raw Data - C55 • Combine monitor shows actual low yield at arrow due to sandy ridge
Nitrogen - C16 • Sample date 2/12/1997 • Red area 29 lbs/acre • Yellow area 85 lbs/acre • Green area 141 lbs/acre
Potassium - C16 • Red area 368 lbs/acre • Yellow area 501 lbs/acre • Green area 634 lbs/acre
Ph. - C16 • Red area 6.8 p.h. level • Yellow area 7.45 p.h. level • Green area 8.09 p.h. level
Phosphorus - C16 • Red area 33 lbs/acre • Yellow area 51 lbs/acre • Green area 69 lbs/acre
Iron - C16 • Red area 5 lbs/acre • Yellow area 12 lbs/acre • Green area 19.9 lbs/acre
Magnesium - C16 • Red area 3 lbs/acre • Yellow area 6.5 lbs/acre • Green area 9.9 lbs/acre