1 / 9

122_2011_1699_MOESM1_ESM

tiva
Download Presentation

122_2011_1699_MOESM1_ESM

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Supplemental Figure 1 Frequency distribution of kernel hardness (index) of the 164 F6-derived recombinant inbred lines (RILs) grown at six field environments in 2007 and 2008. The data sets were obtained from the trials (cb) Across six field environments (a) Corvallis (OR), 2008, (b) Moro (OR), 2008, (c) Pendleton (OR), 2008, (d) Pullman (WA), 2008, (e) Moscow (ID), 2008, (f) Corvallis (OR ), 2007, and (g) Greenhouse (OR ), 2007. Mean trait value of the parental lines OS9A and QCB36 on each environment was indicated by white and black arrow, respectively.

  2. Supplemental Figure 2 Frequency distribution of break flour yield (g/kg) of the 164 F6-derived recombinant inbred lines (RILs) grown at four different field environments in 2008. The data sets were obtained from the trials (cb) Across four environments, (a) Corvallis (OR), (b) Moro (OR), (c) Pendleton (OR), and (d) Pullman (WA). Mean trait value of the parental lines OS9A and QCB36 on each environment was indicated by white and black arrow, respectively.

  3. Supplemental Figure 3 Frequency distribution of bran yield (g/kg) of the 164 F6-derived recombinant inbred lines (RILs) grown at four field environments in 2008. The data sets were obtained from the trials (cb) Across four environments, (a) Corvallis (OR), (b) Moro (OR), (c) Pendleton (OR), and (d) Pullman (WA). Mean trait value of the parental lines OS9A and QCB36 on each environment was indicated by white and black arrow, respectively.

  4. Supplemental Figure 4 Frequency distribution of middling yield (g/kg) of the 164 F6-derived recombinant inbred lines (RILs) grown at four field environments in 2008. The data sets were obtained from the trials (cb) Across four environments, (a) Corvallis (OR), (b) Moro (OR), (c) Pendleton (OR), and (d) Pullman (WA). Mean trait value of the parental lines OS9A and QCB36 on each environment was indicated by white and black arrow, respectively.

  5. Supplemental Figure 5 Frequency distribution of plant height (cm) of the 164 F6-derived recombinant inbred lines (RILs) grown at six field environments in 2007 and 2008. The data sets were obtained from the trials (cb) Across six field environments, (a) Corvallis (OR), 2008, (b) Moro (OR), 2008, (c) Pendleton (OR), 2008, (d) Pullman (WA), 2008, (e) Moscow (ID), 2008, and (f) Corvallis (OR ), 2007. Mean trait value of the parental lines OS9A and QCB36 on each environment was indicated by white and black arrow, respectively.

  6. Supplemental Figure 6 Frequency distribution of days to heading (d) of the 164 F6-derived recombinant inbred lines (RILs) grown at six different environments in 2007 and 2008. The data sets were obtained from the trials (cb) Across six field environments, (a) Corvallis (OR), 2008, (b) Moro (OR), 2008, (c) Pendleton (OR), 2008, (d) Pullman (WA), 2008, (e) Moscow (ID), 2008, and (f) Corvallis (OR), 2007. Mean trait value of the parental lines OS9A and QCB36 on each environment was indicated by white and black arrow, respectively.

  7. Supplemental Figure 7 Frequency distribution of test weight (kg/m³) of the 164 F6-derived recombinant inbred lines (RILs) grown at six different environments in 2007 and 2008. The data sets were obtained from the trials (cb) Across six field environments, (a) Corvallis (OR), 2008, (b) Moro (OR), 2008, (c) Pendleton (OR), 2008, (d) Pullman (WA), 2008, (e) Moscow (ID), 2008, and (f) Corvallis (OR ), 2007. Mean trait value of the parental lines OS9A and QCB36 on each environment was indicated by white and black arrow, respectively.

  8. Supplemental Figure 8 Frequency distribution of grain protein content (g/kg) of the 164 F6-derived recombinant inbred lines (RILs) grown at six different environments in 2007 and 2008. The data sets were obtained from the trials (cb) Across six field environments (a) Corvallis (OR), 2008, (b) Moro (OR), 2008, (c) Pendleton (OR), 2008, (d) Pullman (WA), 2008, (e) Moscow (ID), 2008, and (f) Corvallis (OR ), 2007. Mean trait value of the parental lines OS9A and QCB36 on each environment was indicated by white and black arrow, respectively.

  9. Supplemental Figure 9 Frequency distribution of thousand-kernel weight (g) of the 164 F6-derived recombinant inbred lines (RILs) grown at six different environments in 2007 and 2008. The data sets were obtained from the trials (cb) Across six field environments, (a) Corvallis (OR), 2008, (b) Moro (OR), 2008, (c) Pendleton (OR), 2008, (d) Pullman (WA), 2008, (e) Moscow (ID), 2008, (f) Corvallis (OR ), 2007, and (g) Greenhouse (OR ), 2007. Mean trait value of the parental lines OS9A and QCB36 on each environment was indicated by white and black arrow, respectively.

More Related