1 / 30

Cindy LK Lam, clklam@hku.hk Weng Y Chin, Tai Pong Lam, Yvonne YC Lo, FMU

CADENZA Symposium 2009 The Primary Care Approach to Psychological Problems in the Elderly: From Screening to Problem-solving. Cindy LK Lam, clklam@hku.hk Weng Y Chin, Tai Pong Lam, Yvonne YC Lo, FMU Peter WH Lee, Department of Psychiatry, Daniel YT Fong, Department of Nursing Studies

tlindsey
Download Presentation

Cindy LK Lam, clklam@hku.hk Weng Y Chin, Tai Pong Lam, Yvonne YC Lo, FMU

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. CADENZA Symposium 2009The Primary Care Approach to Psychological Problems in the Elderly: From Screening to Problem-solving Cindy LK Lam, clklam@hku.hk Weng Y Chin, Tai Pong Lam, Yvonne YC Lo, FMU Peter WH Lee, Department of Psychiatry, Daniel YT Fong, Department of Nursing Studies The University of Hong Kong

  2. HCPF (# 218016), Food and Health Bureau, the Government of the HKSAR • Ethics Committee, Faculty of Medicine, the University of Hong Kong (EC 1293-99). • Dr. Stephen WK Chow, Dr. Kevin KL Pang, Dr. Johnny CY Lam, Dr. Sam CS Au, Dr. Jacky HH Sze and Dr. Brigitte E Schlaikier who provided PST-PC • Ms. On-On Cheng and Alice OL Cheung for co-ordination of data collection and analysis Acknowledgment

  3. From Screening to Problem-solving • Challenges & opportunities in PC • Study on screening & brief PST- PC for elderly with screened positive psychological problems • Implications for clinical practice & future research Psychological Problems in the Elderly in Primary Care

  4. Poverty (1/5 on CSSA) & ill-health (2/3 chronically ill) • Suicide rate (32/100,000, 2004) of HK elderly is second highest in the world • 86% victims had psychiatric problems • Elderly population survey prevalence • 19% screened positive of depression • 5% known psychological problems • 0.4% known depression Challenges : Tip of the Iceberg

  5. 77% consulted within 1 month before suicide • 85% of elderly consulted at least once/yr • Mean 5-8 consultations/yr • Continuity of care • Trusting doctor-patient relationship • Whole-person care • 20% elderly had psychological problems but 48% undiagnosed Opportunities in PC

  6. Unrecognized Psychological Problems in the Elderly (UPPE) Is it important? Is screening useful? Is PST-PC effective? Courtesy of photolibrary@hku.hk

  7. Aims & Objectives • Prevalence & risk factors • Impact on HRQOL & consultation rates • Nature of the problems • Effectiveness of brief PST- PC for elderly patients screened positive of psychological problems Screening & PST-PC for UPPE in PC

  8. 5225 consecutive GOPC patients aged 60+ 1371 screened negative 1473 refused, 1614 not eligible, 285 incomplete interviews 482 HADS screened positive 183 Refused RCT 299 Agreed to RCT 149 randomized to3x PST-PC 132 attended ≥1 PST-PC sessions 150 randomized to 3 x placebo 132 attended ≥1 video session Blinded assessment at week 6, 12, 26 & 52; 69% completion Blinded assessment at week 6, 12, 26 & 52; 71% completion

  9. Screening by Hospital Anxiety & Depression Scale (HADS): positive if anxiety score ≥3 or depression score ≥6 • The MOS SF-36 Health Survey on HRQOL (PCS & MCS) • Structured Q. on monthly consultation rates, sociodemography & co-morbidity • PST-PC record form Study Instruments

  10. Three 3-hour training workshops for FM residents • 3 structured brief PST-PC sessions (20-45 min)  Establish rapport  Identify any psychiatric diagnosis  Patient identifies & prioritize problems  Patient to think of possible solutions for main problem  Suggest more solutions  List advantages and disadvantages of each solution  Prioritize solutions  Settle on the preferred solution: break it down into steps  Patient is to work on the first step of the solution Intervention: PST-PC

  11. Results Courtesy of photolibrary@hku.hk

  12. Prevalence of UPPE in PC

  13. Negative (n=1372) PST-PC (n=149) Video (n=150) Refused (n=183) Age, mean (SD) 72.8 (6.8) 71.6 (6.5) 72.0 (7.1) 72.2 (7.5) Gender (% male) 55.9§ 45.0 41.3 38.3 No formal educ % 47.9§ 55.7 51.3 67.2# Married, living spouse % 62.4§ 65.8 61.3 65 >2 chronic disease % 12.5 § 27.5 24.0 21.3 HADS mean AS (SD) 0.4 (1.7) § 5.0 (3.7) 4.7 (2.8) 4.9 (3.1) HDAS mean DS (SD) 1.1 (1.4)§ 4.9 (4.4) * 3.9 (3.5) * 4.7 (4.0) SF-36 PCS mean (SD) 43.5 (10.9)§ 36.8 (13.6) 37.2 (13.3) 33.4 (13.2)# SF-36 MCS mean (SD) 62.1 (6.7)§ 49.2(12.3) 51.9 (12.8) 51.1 (12) Monthly WM consult (SD) 1.23 (1.1) § 1.4 (1.1) 1.5 (1.3) 1.5 (1.7) Baseline Characteristics of Subjects §,*, #Significant difference betweenPSC & video groups, HADS positive & negative groups, and RCT & refused RCT groups, respectively

  14. Risk Factors of UPPE(Adjusted Odds Ratio by Multivariate Logistic Regression)

  15. Adjusted Effects UPPE on HRQOL & Monthly Consultation RatesMultivariate linear regression coefficients (95% CI) * Results from population survey 1998

  16. Changes in SF-36 & HADS Scores from Baseline * Significant difference after adjusting for multiplicity by Holm’s procedure, baseline DS and MH, socio-demographics and co-morbidity

  17. Changes in Monthly Consultations No Significant difference in consultation rates from baseline

  18. * Significant by linear mixed effects analysisadjusting for baseline DS & MH scores, sociodemography and co-morbidity

  19. Is it important? Is screening useful? Is PST-PC effective? Courtesy of photolibrary@hku.hk

  20. UPPE were important: common, impair QOL & increase consultation • Screening increased detection, target >2 chronic diseases & married females • Majority did not meet DSM IV criteria • Family, health & finance problems • Solutions required changes • Brief PST-PC had short-term benefits • Group viewing of video improved QOL Key Findings

  21. Quality of PST: assured in that tasks were achieved in >80% sessions on random review • Many elderly could not identify problem/ solution • 3 sessions of PST-PC were not sufficient? • Lack of motivation? • Milder problems less responsive to treatment? • Cultural factors? • The placebo intervention was too powerful? Limited Benefit of Brief PST-PC

  22. Need for PC-relevant diagnostic taxonomy • Psychological diagnosis & treatment cannot be separated from physical & social problems • Little indications for drugs • A multi-disciplinary system approach integrated with routine PC • Family interventions are needed • The family doctor’s role in detection, motivation, co-ordination & maintenance Implications for Clinical Practice & Future Research

  23. Primary Care for HK…the way forwardThursday, 15 Oct 2009 2:00 – 4:30 pm Officiating Guests of Honour Dr York Chow, Secretary for Food and Health, Professor Raymond Liang, President, HKAM Keynote by Prof. Barbara Starfield “Measuring Primary Care & Its Benefits” Forum Discussion Cheung Kung Hai Conference Centre L.K.S. Faculty of Medicine, HKU 21 Sassoon Rd, HK. www.hku.hk/fmunit

  24. Lam CLK, Lee PWH, Fong DYT, Lam TP. A randomised controlled trial on the effectiveness of screening and brief problem-solving counselling for elderly patients with undiagnosed psychological problems in primary care. H K Med J 2008; 14(6) Suppl: 31-35. • Lam CLK, Chin WY, Lee PWH, Lo YYC, Fong DYT, Lam TP. Unrecognized psychological problems impair quality of life and increase consultation rates in Chinese elderly patients. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 2009; 24:979-989. • Lam CLK, Fong DYT, Chin WY, Lee PWH, Lam ETP, Lo YYC.Brief Problem-solving Treatment in Primary Care (PST-PC) Was Not More Effective than Placebo for Elderly Patients Screened - Positive of Psychological Problems.Int J Geriatr Psychiatry (in press) Publications

  25. HRQOL by HADS Classification All differences between groups significant (p<0.001) by 2-sample t test

  26. Consultations by HADS Classification * Significant (p<0.05) by 2-sample t test

More Related