100 likes | 117 Views
Join the IPPM Working Group session, discussing spatial and temporal metrics, traceroutes, jitter comparisons, and more. Review progress on standards like OWAMP and TWAMP. Plan upcoming milestones and charter updates. Don't miss this detailed network assessment forum.
E N D
IPPM WG @ IETF65 Tuesday March 21 17:40-19:50
IPPM Working Group • Chairs: • Henk Uijterwaal <henk@ripe.net> • Matt Zekauskas <matt@internet2.edu> • Email: • ippm@ietf.org • ippm-request@ietf.org • https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ippm
Agenda • Administrativia: • Agenda Bashing • Scribe • Minutes • Blue Sheets • Status of Drafts and Milestones
Agenda (2) • Composition of metrics • Framework: draft-ietf-ippm-framework-compagg-00.txt (Steven v/d Berghe/Al Morton) • Spatial Composition: draft-ietf-ippm-spatial-composition-00.txt (Emile Stephan/Al Morton) • MultiMetrics: draft-ietf-ippm-multimetrics-00.txt (Emile Stephan/Al Morton/Lei Liang)
Agenda (3) • Traceroutes: draft-niccolini-ippm-storetraceroutes-03 (Saverio Niccolini) • Jitter Metric Comparison (Roman Krzanowski and Al Morton) • Packet Burst Metric (Roman Krzanowski) • AOB
Status of drafts • Reordering: draft-ietf-ippm-reordering-11.txt • WG LC done • Sent to the IESG • OWAMP: draft-ietf-ippm-owdp-16.txt • Security issues raised by AD • Solved • Approved by IESG • Ready to become an RFC
Status of drafts (2) • TWAMP: draft-ietf-ippm-twamp-00.txt • Stable • Needs security section • Waiting for OWAMP to be done • Implementation report: draft-ietf-ippm-implement-01 • Discussed with AD • Can be part of WGLC for advancing metrics • Document fine as it is
Status of drafts (3) • Capacity draft: draft-ietf-ippm-bw-capacity-01 • Progress since the last meeting (Email from Joe Ishac) • Comments on the list • Clarify what we mean by "Nominal Capacity does not change over time". • Add a paragraph mentioning that a link can refer to more than one physical connection (or more specifically that it doesn't imply a single connection between two entities). • Unfortunately, we missed the deadline for the Dallas IETF. • Plan on having the new version out shortly after this IETF. • We would like to get this out the door. • Needs more review: • Does this define everything we have to define?
Milestones • Dec 2005: • Submit draft on the One-Way Active Measurement Protocol to the IESG for consideration as a PS (Done) • Jan 2006: • Submit initial applicability statement for the IPPM and ITU Jitter Measurements to the WG (Open) • Submit draft on a packet reordering metric to the IESG for Proposed Standard (Done)
Milestones (2) • Jun 2006: • Submit draft on Two-way active measurements protocol (TWAMP) to the IESG for consideration as proposed standard • Submit link bandwidth capacity definitions draft to the IESG, for consideration as an Informational RFC • Submit draft on storing results of traceroute measurements to the IESG • Develop new charter text • Dec 2006: • Submit draft on spatial composition of metrics to the IESG • Submit draft on Temporal Aggregation of Metrics to the IESG • Submit draft on spatial decomposition and multicast metrics to the IESG