280 likes | 295 Views
Sustainability reporting: A contrarian’s viewpoint. Lynn Patterson Director, Corporate Responsibility RBC lynn.e.patterson@rbc.com 416-974-1381. The facts. Source: Corporate Register CR Reporting Awards ‘ 08 March 2009. Why report?. 61.4. human rights. 61.0. energy/eco-efficiency.
E N D
Sustainability reporting:A contrarian’s viewpoint Lynn Patterson Director, Corporate Responsibility RBC lynn.e.patterson@rbc.com 416-974-1381
The facts Source: Corporate Register CR Reporting Awards ‘08 March 2009
61.4 human rights 61.0 energy/eco-efficiency 60.4 health and safety 59.4 climate protection 58.8 environmental policy environmental management of the production process 58.8 56.8 corporate governance 56.6 standards in developing countries 53.9 avoiding soil and water contamination 53.9 environmental management system 52.7 bribery and corruption 51.1 supply chain standards for social issues 34.5 corporate citizenship Stakeholders say they want to hear about: Source: Pleon
Transitioning from “a report” to “reporting” Ad hoc Annual Report Marketing Vehicles CR Report/Review CR or sustainability website Responses to SRI analysts
So…what to include? • Issues that are relevant to your business (common sense) • GRI indicators (menu approach) • Areas of interest identified on SRI surveys • Competitive scan (financial services) • Input from stakeholders • Report rankers (CERES, Stratos) • Content of award-winning reporters (UK, Brazil, Canada, US) • Current events (trends, scandals, media campaigns etc.) • Codes of conduct or voluntary commitments your company has signed (UN Global Compact)
RBC’s reporting cycle Spring Summer Fall Winter
RBC reporting strengths and weaknesses • Readable style • Consistent structure year over year • 3-year comparative data • Discussion of issues that are relevant to the business • Good mix of formats for various audiences • Few or no targets • No external verification • Lack of specific information about risk, liabilities and exposure within our investments arm (carbon etc). • Lacking specific detail on CR governance (such as job titles (!) • Too much good news
Are these your target audiences? Who’s reading CR reports? CR Consultants Corporate CR Professionals Students Academics
1. Surveys 2. Results pre-packaged and sold 4.Desire for increased disclosure 3. “Seals of Approval” used for company PR Who’s making money?
Is CR content really ‘material’? “Whatever else emerges from this crisis at the heart of our financial system, a total overhaul in the content and presentation of company annual reports is now due. [B&B’s Corporate Responsibility report was 28 pages long] … 7 times longer than the coverage given to risk management and control. And here we find top-notch twaddle: deep layers of low-grade corporate mince that is now routinely served up by the bucketful in annual reports.” Bill Jamieson, Upon reading the Bradford & Bingley 2007 Annual Report From The Scotsman
5 Best Practices
Lynn Patterson Director, Corporate Responsibility RBC lynn.e.patterson@rbc.com 416-974-1381