1 / 8

Planning & Change control – Suppliers Safety Forum Update

Planning & Change control – Suppliers Safety Forum Update. R Dickinson / J Murphy / R Smith. Project Remit. Planning - Problem Statement - Planning is often identified as a causal factor in accidents and incidents, however what exactly ‘failed’ can often be unclear

tobias-landry
Download Presentation

Planning & Change control – Suppliers Safety Forum Update

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Planning & Change control – Suppliers Safety Forum Update R Dickinson / J Murphy / R Smith

  2. Project Remit Planning - Problem Statement - Planning is often identified as a causal factor in accidents and incidents, however what exactly ‘failed’ can often be unclear Planning time - Problem Statement - having adequate time and resource to plan and putting a freeze of change (design, methodology, sequencing etc.) at a given point prior to the activity Change - Problem Statement - change occurring and laying dormant and undetected until the actual work takes place Change Control Process - Problem Statement - having appropriate change control processes that assess the impact of the change Involving the Right People - Problem Statement - Involving the right people in the planning process – how often does the supervisor or tradesman get asked to contribute

  3. IW & SMIS Event Review • IP Irregular Working events (118) – 2010/11/12 – 57% show or indicate a planning issue contributed. • IP SMIS extract events (700) - 2011/12 – 56% of relevant events show or indicate a planning issue contributed.

  4. The Team A team was assembled from Network Rail and our supply chain AMCo – Andries Lienberg Carillion – Rob Tunley Invensys – Robert Cairns Murphy – John Murphy Network Rail – Mike Lyons, Mark Tingay tusp – Richard Smith A series of workshops were undertaken with additional work being carried out outside of these.

  5. Project Roadmap July Meeting – Outcomes of Logic Mapping exercise

  6. Planning • The working group considered long term – medium term and - short term planning. The aim being to understand how plans are currently formed and how they can be improved. The process maps below were developed. / T-37 TT-90

  7. Actions taken forward July to date • Task Briefing Sheet development • Murphy and AMCo undertook internal trials of revised TBS format. Feedback positive, formats adopted on certain projects. • SNE S&SD have undertaken an exercise reviewing a number of current TBS formats and developed a revised / simplified TSB template for consideration.

  8. Actions taken forward July to date and going forward The Planning Toolkit • Review / Finalise Planning Tool Kit requirements • Concise guidance - consideration of existing good practice gathered • Mission Room utilisation – Surround vision (currently in use on F2A and currently looking at York) • 3 and 4 D Modelling utilisation • Briefing and training requirements • Creation of Planning Centres (dedicated locations) • www.planning-toolkit.co.uk • Collaborative working group interfaces and opportunities • (integration with the Route planning process and the Electrification work stream)

More Related