170 likes | 193 Views
This lecture provides valuable insights on management practices in Europe, the US, and emerging markets. The key takeaways highlight challenges in adopting basic practices and the factors influencing differences in management, such as competition, governance, ownership, and education. The importance of professional CEOs and the impact of multinational ownership on management quality are discussed, along with the role of labor market regulations and education in shaping effective management strategies. The session underscores the need for continuous improvement in practices and showcases the potential for multinationals to drive positive changes globally.
E N D
Management Practices in Europe, the US and Emerging Markets Nick Bloom (Stanford Economics) John Van Reenen (Stanford GSB/LSE) Lecture 6 1
Take away summary points from last week • Many firms often are not adopting basic management practices, in large part due to a lack of awareness • Changing practices is very slow – takes several years: • Takes time for employees to buy into change • Changes are complementary – e.g. monitoring & pay • Change may not be permanent – need to change processes, incentives and often people to avoid backsliding
WE FIND FIVE FACTORS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENCES IN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Competition Governance - Family firms & Private Equity Multinationals Labor market regulations Education
COMPETITION IS ASSOCIATED WITH BETTER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Assessed management practice score Reported number of competitors
WE FIND FIVE FACTORS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENCES IN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Competition Ownership Multinationals Labor market regulations Education
FIRMS WITH PROFESSIONAL CEOS ARE TYPICALLY WELL RUN. GOVERNMENT, FOUNDER, FAMILY MANAGED FIRMS ARE NOT Distribution of firm management scores by ownership. Overlaid dashed line is approximate density for dispersed shareholders, the most common US and Canadian ownership type Average Management Score
share family CEO share founderCEO (1st generation) share government owned ONWERSHIP PATTERNS OF THESE “POOR MANAGEMENT” GROUPS VARY SUBSTANTIALLY share of ownership (for types associated with low management scores)
WE FIND FIVE FACTORS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENCES IN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Competition Ownership Multinationals Labor market regulations Education
MULTINATIONALS APPEAR ABLE TO TRANSPORT GOOD MANAGEMENT AROUND THE WORLD Foreign multinationals Domestic firms Average Management Score
MULTINATIONAL OWNERSHIP VARIES SUBSTANTIALLY ACROSS COUNTRIES Foreign multinationals Domestic multinationals Share of multinationals
WE FIND FIVE FACTORS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENCES IN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Competition Governance - Family firms & Private Equity Multinationals Labor market regulations Education
LIGHT LABOR MARKET REGULATIONS ALSO FACILITIATE GOOD PEOPLE MANAGEMENT Average people management(hiring, firing, pay and promotions) World Bank Employment Rigidity Index
WE FIND FIVE FACTORS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH DIFFERENCES IN MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Competition Governance - Family firms & Private Equity Multinationals Labor market regulations Education
EDUCATION IS ALSO STRONGLY LINKED WITH BETTER MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Non-managers Managers Percent with a degree Management score (rounded to nearest 0.5)
Take away summary points • Family, founder and government firms, in uncompetitive markets are likely candidates for bad management • Detached external owners (private equity and dispersed shareholders) are associated with the best management • Practices can be improved in every country – multinationals seem to be well managed everywhere
MY FAVOURITE QUOTES: The difficulties of defining ownership in Europe Production Manager: “We’re owned by the Mafia” Interviewer: “I think that’s the “Other” category……..although I guess I could put you down as an “Italian multinational” ?” Americans on geography Interviewer: “How many production sites do you have abroad? Manager in Indiana, US: “Well…we have one in Texas…”