1 / 20

Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Consumer Behaviour

Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Consumer Behaviour. Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013. Consumer Theory without preferences.

tod
Download Presentation

Consumption, Production, Welfare B: Consumer Behaviour

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Consumption, Production, Welfare B:Consumer Behaviour Univ. Prof. dr. Maarten Janssen University of Vienna Winter semester 2013

  2. Consumer Theory without preferences • Revealed preference: We can look at choices made of individuals and ask whether they satisfy some natural consistency requirements • General: if in two choice situations, x and y were both included, and in one choice situation the agent chose x, then he cannot uniquely choose y in the other situation • Under a budget constraint: if at prices p and wealth level w, individual chose x(p,w) and if at prices p’ and wealth level w’ individual chose x(p’,w’), then px(p’,w’) ≤ w implies p’x(p,w) > w’ • Graphical illustration budget constraint two goods

  3. Implications for demand theory • Does RP imply that demand curves are downward sloping? • Graphical illustration • Only if price changes are compensated by wealth changes • Slutsky compensation: you compensate agent so that she can just afford old consumption bundle, i.e., p’x(p,w) = w’ • RP in this case implies (p’ – p)[x(p’,w’) - x(p,w)] ≤ 0

  4. Recent study by Wieland Müller et al. (AER 2013, forthcoming) • Internet experiments with large sample of Dutch population, of which researchers know many features (age, education, wealth, etc.) • They perform RP tests in choice situations • Who is more rational (is more consistent with RP)? • Younger, more educated people • Doing well in RP tests correlates well with wealth of individuals (if corrected for age, education and other features)

  5. Implication Equivalence • RP has empirical implications (that can be violated) • Utility maximization under a budget constraint has empirical implications • These empirical implications are almost identical

  6. Maximization implication • Budget set has a slope of • Utility function has indifference curve given by implying (if only and change) • In optimum ratio of marginal utilities has to be equal to price ratio • Helps to derive demand functions

  7. Application: gasoline tax proposal under president Carter • Carter proposed to increase gasoline tax to reduce use of gasoline in USA • Critique: the poor can then not afford to have a car (as they cannot afford to pay gigher gasoline price) • Carter reacted by saying that the poor will be income compensated for the tax increase • Critique’s then said that the whole proposal is then ridiculous as it is ineffective: if people can afford the same amount as before, they will. • Who is right?

  8. Econ Questions and Analysis • Will the consumption of gasoline decrease after an gasoline price tax? • If consumers are compensated will they consume less gasoline? • - How are they compensated? • If they are Slutsky compensated, will they consume less? • How to reconclide answers to 1 and 3? • If they are Slutsky compensated, will government run a deficit over this policy? Other goods Original budget line Gasoline consumption

  9. Further concepts in consumer theory • Indirect utility function v(p,w): maximum utility an individual agent can get at prices p and wealth level w. • Increasing in w, non-decreasing in p • Expenditure function e(p,u): minimum wealth level you need to be able to reach utility level u at price p. • Increasing in w, non-decreasing in p • Hicksian demand h(p,u) and Walrasiandemand x(p,w): • If at prices p and wealth level w consumer chooses x(p,w), then h(p,v(p,w)) = x(p,w). Similarly, if at (p,u) consumer chooses h(p,u), then x(p,e(p,u)) = h(p,u)

  10. Relation between h(p,u) and e(p,u) • Expenditure • LHS gives the minimum wealth you need to reach u at prices p; RHS gives expenditure if you keep a certain demand level. • = ) • Main idea: at some prices, demand ) is optimal and there . • If e(p,u) is differentiable, then you have result. • Show figure

  11. Property of Hicksian demand • If price of y becomes relatively lower than that of x and consumer is compensated such that he can achieve same utility level, then consumption of y has to be nondecreasing and of x nonincreasing • In terms of Hicksian demand: (p’ – p)[h(p’,u) - h(p,u)] ≤ 0 • This is the substitution effect (and is always nonpositive) • When can it be zero? y X

  12. Income effects • Where can demand be after a decrease in income, wealth? • Normal goods • Inferior goods • All colouredchoicesarepossible Y X

  13. Income and substitution effects • A price change has a substitution and income effect on demand • Total effect of a price change from A to B can be decomposed into a substitution effect (from A to C) and an income effect (from C to B) C B A

  14. Income and substitution effects: Mathematically • Demand can be written as h(p,u) = x(p,e(p,u)) • Thus, = • As sign of LHS is negative, if income effect is positive (normal goods), then first term on RHS has to be negative. If income effect is strongly negative, then this first term may be positive (Giffen good, Veblen effect)

  15. Relationship h(p,u) and x(p,w) Normal goods Inferior goods p p h(p,u) x(p,w) x(p,w) h(p,u) Q Q

  16. Welfare evaluations • How do consumers appreciate price changes. A pure economist‘s response would be to say: v(p‘,w) – v(p,w) is appropriate measure • But how big is this? • Money-metric measure should come in handy: e(p,v(p,w)) is how much money you need to be able to reach utility level v(p,w) when price are p • How much did consumer becomes better off because of a price change from p to p‘?: e(p,v(p‘,w)) - e(p,v(p,w)) • Depends on choice of p. Two obvious choices: • P is old price p: Equivalent variation. How much money should you comepnsate to consumer to make him just willing to stay with old prices? • P is new price p: Compensating variation. How much money should you comepnsate to consumer to make him just willing to accept new prices?

  17. Equivalent Variation: graphically Y • Suppose price of good y is normalized to 1 • Shift from A to B is due to price decrease in price of x • How much money should consumer get to stay with old prices? EV measured on vertical axis • Can you draw CV systematically? EV A B X

  18. Equivalent variation: more detail for this price decrease of x Mathematically Graphically • EV = e(p,u’) – e(p,u) = e(p,u’) – w = e(p,u’) – e(p’,u’) = p EV p’ h(p,u’) X

  19. Compensating variation when x is a normal good Mathematically Graphically • CV = e(p’,u’) – e(p’,u) = w - e(p’,u) = e(p,u) – e(p’,u) = • Relation with EV: is u higher than u’ or not? • With price decrease we are analyzing here u is smaller than u’ and so we have p CV EV p’ x(p,w) h(p,u’) h(p,u) X

  20. What measures consumer surplus? Interpretation Graphically • If we use consumer surplus as a measure of welfare change due to a price decrease, then we have figure on right • For normal goods this is smaller than EV and larger than CV (see previous slides) • It is equal to both if there are no income effects • Good exercise: try to depict EV, CV, CS with inferior goods p CS p’ x(p,w) X

More Related