290 likes | 368 Views
Implementing and Maintaining an ISP Backbone. Kevin Butler. Tier 1 ISP Backbones. Comprise some of the world’s largest IP networks Tier 1 companies include Sprint, AT&T, PSINet
E N D
Implementing and Maintaining an ISP Backbone Kevin Butler
Tier 1 ISP Backbones • Comprise some of the world’s largest IP networks • Tier 1 companies include Sprint, AT&T, PSINet • UUNET has the world’s largest IP data network, presence on four continents and future expansion into Latin and South America
Service Level Agreements • SLAs are an important and prestigious tool in attracting and maintaining customers • Comprised of uptime guarantees and bounds on latency through various geographic regions • most ISPs currently have latency < 50ms across the US
Supporting the Customer • Quality and expertise of first-line customer support varies wildly between companies • depending on size, geographic location and company focus, some front-line support teams outsourced to third parties • some in-house high level support teams have skills equivalent or superior to NOCs
Network Operations Centres • Generally the teams concerned with backbone maintenance and support • trend towards consolidation into “Super-NOCs” (eg. one for Americas, one for Europe) • specialisation within NOC for product support (eg. dial, VPN, backbone NOCs)
NOC Tools • NOCOL - Network Operations Centre On Line (freeware UNIX) • Mediahouse monitoring (mainly web) • Micromuse Netcool (now owned by Lucent) - used by MCI WorldCom, PSINet, BT
Dial Access • Dial is a major selling point, especially with customers who travel a lot or are their own ISPs • connections made through an Ascend MAX TNT, which can support up to 720 concurrent callers • back-end is a DS-3 into a backbone router, routers advertised by an IGP (eg. RIP)
Dial-Related Technologies • COBRA (Central Office Based Remote Access) allow building of virtual POPs by backhauling PRIs • RADIUS (Remote Authentication Dial In User Service)
Integrated Services Digital Network • ISDN customers authenticate by RADIUS similar to dial users • underlying architecture similar but dial equipment often administrated differently • ISDN maintained within same AS as backbone whereas dial often in its own AS
DS-1 and high-speed access • Customer connections usually multiplexed, come into DSU as a channelised DS-3 • gateway routers on ISP side usually Cisco 7500 series, increasingly using Cisco 12000 • customers connect using Cisco 1604, 2621, some 3600 series, very large customers use 7500 series routers
Gateway Routers • obtain routes from customers usually statically, but sometimes by BGP • usually run link-state IGP within AS (eg. OSPF, IS-IS) • Cisco 7513 backplanes 1.8 Gbps while 12008 does 40 Gbps
Where does traffic go from here? • Most ISPs have two levels of networks above the access router • Metropolitan networks aggregate gateway traffic, generally city-wide (if multiple POPs in city) • transit networks aggregate metro network’s traffic, responsible for inter-city transport
ATM Switches • Terminate long-haul OC-12, OC-48 circuits and metro rings • Choice of vendor contingent on ISP, commonly Newbridge, Fore Systems (ASX-1000 and ASX-4000)
Example of an ATM interface TR1.EG1: interface ATM2/0 description To HA13.BLAH1 3C1 atm vc-per-vp 512 atm pvc 16 0 16 ilmi ! interface ATM2/0.195 point-to-point description To XR1.BLAH1 ATM6/0 ip address 146.188.200.98 255.255.255.252 ip router isis Net-Backbone atm pvc 195 0 195 aal5snap clns router isis Net-Backbone
Implementation of BGP • BGP run between autonomous systems and peers, as well as multi-homed customers • monolithic AS broken up into BGP confederations for ease of work • routes controlled using access lists and route maps
BGP • Communities are destinations that share common attributes (eg. through access-list filters) BGP table version is 23718690, local router ID is 205.150.242.2 Status codes: s suppressed, d damped, h history, * valid, > best, i - internal Origin codes: i - IGP, e - EGP, ? - incomplete Network Next Hop Metric LocPrf Weight Path *>i24.64.0.0/19 198.133.49.7 100 0 6327 6172 i *>i24.64.0.0/14 198.133.49.7 100 0 6327 i *>i24.64.32.0/19 198.133.49.7 100 0 6327 6172 i *>i24.64.64.0/19 198.133.49.7 100 0 6327 6172 i *>i24.64.96.0/19 198.133.49.7 100 0 6327 6172 i *>i24.64.192.0/19 198.133.49.7 100 0 6327 6172 i *>i24.64.224.0/19 198.133.49.7 100 0 6327 6172 i *>i24.65.0.0/19 198.133.49.7 100 0 6327 6172 i *>i24.65.96.0/19 198.133.49.7 100 0 6327 6172 i *>i24.65.128.0/19 198.133.49.7 100 0 6327 6172 i
Advantages of BGP for User • Allows for load-sharing and redundancy • routes can be biased through AS path prepending • requirement is high-quality router with close to 100% uptime to avoid connection flaps and subsequent route dampening
Common Customer Issues • Static routes on backbone - often difficult to spot, can cause very strange routing results • pull-up routes for netblocks smaller than /24, required to avoid BGP dampening • BGP recalculations - if done on a transit router, entire backbone segments can experience outages
Customer Requirements of the Backbone • Redundancy - networks are redundant but card failures can take down whole routers • physical connection to POP from customer is SPF • low latency - massive increases in demand on backbone makes this difficult • over $2 million a day spent on global backbone upgrades
DSL: low cost, high speed • DSL might phase out ISDN connections • difficult to troubleshoot from network standpoint • connections pass through telco’s frame or ATM cloud between DSLAM and VR • RedBack SMS (Subscriber Management System) 1000 commonly used as VR
RedBack SMS 1000 • Supports up to 4000 sessions • OC-3 out to metro network • traffic-shaping accomplished with profiles atm profile samplecust counters shaping vbr-nrt pcr 1000 cdvt 100 scr 100 bt 10
Increasing Capacity • Backbone capacity increasing at a huge rate • Traffic engineering combined with high backplane becoming increasingly important • many ISPs turning to Juniper routers • UUNET rolled out production OC-192c with Juniper M160 running MPLS
Juniper Routers • JUNOS supports MPLS and RSVP isis { interface all; } ospf { area 0.0.0.0 { interface so-0/0/0 { metric 15; retransmit-interval 10; hello-interval 5; } } } [edit]
Distributed DOS attacks • Can be very detrimental to backbone (even causing switch crashes) • Combated by rate-limiting ICMP on routers • Most effective defense is community-wide egress filtering; requires co-operation throughout the Internet
Canadian Network Challenges • Geographically, population resides in virtually a straight line across the south • major focus is on southbound capacity to the US • CRTC regulations on telcos create different arrangements • heterogeneous network to the US, integration a big issue
Questions? • Anything I can clarify or expand on... • Thank you!