130 likes | 415 Views
Subjectivism. Ethical Subjectivism – the view that our moral opinions are based on our feelings and nothing more. Ethical subjectivism is a meta-ethical theory Does not tell us how we ought to live Does not tell us what specific actions are right or wrong. Simple Subjectivism.
E N D
Ethical Subjectivism – the view that our moral opinions are based on our feelings and nothing more. • Ethical subjectivism is a meta-ethical theory • Does not tell us how we ought to live • Does not tell us what specific actions are right or wrong
Simple Subjectivism • “x is morally acceptable” • “x is right” • “x is good” • All these statements = “I (the speaker) approve of x”
Problems with Simple Subjectivism • No one is infallible • There cannot be moral disagreement (though in fact there is disagreement about moral issues).
Emotivism • Emotivism does not view moral assertions as either true or false. • Reporting – “I (the speaker) approve of x” • Expressing – “Hurrah for x” (does not express my feelings about x) • Moral statements are essentially commands, and not at all fact stating.
Virtues of Emotivism • Problem with fallibility is avoided since moral utterances are not true or false. • Different senses of disagreement • Factual disagreement • Disagreements about what we think ought to happen • Disagreements about attitudes • Disagreements in attitude
Problem with Emotivism • Cannot account for good and bad reasoning in ethics. • If moral statements are commands intended to change the attitude/behavior of another, then any reason given that successfully changes someone’s attitude is morally appropriate.
Proofs in Ethics • Subjectivism and Emotivism are troubling because they seem to imply that reason is not an important element of morality. • “No Proof Argument” • (1) If there were any such things as objective truths in ethics, we should be able to prove that some moral opinions are true and others are false. • (2) But in fact we cannot prove which moral opinions are true and which are false. • (3) Therefore, there is no such thing as objective truth in ethics.
Objections to the “no proof argument” • Inappropriate standard of proof i.e., ethics ≠ science • The difficult proofs in ethics are analogous to difficult proofs in science
Example: Geometry • Point: No, length, no width, no depth. Point 10
Connect three lines and you get. . . Triangle