1 / 12

Beam Interlock System Dependability Study

Beam Interlock System Dependability Study. RSWG – 31 st January 2005. On the Agenda…. 1. Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis Background. 2. Performing the FMECA Beam Interlock System User Box Only. 3. Conclusions How things look so far. FMECA.

toni
Download Presentation

Beam Interlock System Dependability Study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Beam Interlock SystemDependability Study RSWG – 31st January 2005

  2. On the Agenda… 1. Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis • Background 2. Performing the FMECA • Beam Interlock System User Box Only 3. Conclusions • How things look so far Beam Interlock System Strategy

  3. FMECA Failure Modes, Effects and Criticality Analysis In what way can something go wrong?… …when it does go wrong, what happens to the system?… …and just how much of a problem does this cause? Beam Interlock System Strategy

  4. How is it done? FMECA starts at the Component Level of a system MIL-STD-1629 Break a large system into blocks, defining smaller, manageable sub-systems get subsystem schematics, component list, and understand what it does MIL-HDBK-338 MIL-HDBK-217 get MTBF of each component on the list, derive PFAIL(mission) MIL-HDBK-338 FMD-97 derive failure modes and failure mode ratios for each component explain the effect of each failure mode on both the subsystem and system determine the probability of each failure mode happening. Draw conclusions! Beam Interlock System Strategy

  5. Applying the Method to the CIBU 1. Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis • Background 2. Performing the FMECA • Beam Interlock System User Box Only 3. Conclusions • How things look so far Beam Interlock System Strategy

  6. Block Diagram System: Beam Interlock Subsystem: CIBU Beam Interlock System Strategy

  7. Applying the Methodology 1/2 Bill of Materials MIL-HDBK-217F or manufacturer FMD-97 MIL-HDBK-338 Beam Interlock System Strategy

  8. Applying the Methodology 2/2 Schematic multiply through Designer Knowledge MIL-HDBK-338 Beam Interlock System Strategy

  9. So… What’s the Next Step 1. Failure Mode, Effect and Criticality Analysis • Background 2. Performing the FMECA • Beam Interlock System User Box Only 3. Conclusions • How things look so far Beam Interlock System Strategy

  10. Conclusion 75 Simultaneous Beam Dump CIBU 39 Independant Beam Dump CIBU 10 Hour LHC mission 400 Missions per year During one year it’s probable that for all CIBUs 2-3 will fail in one way or another 0-1 will fail without having any impact on the system 0-1 will fail during a mission causing a Beam Dump, and requesting Maintenance 1-2 will fail only requesting Maintenance at the end of the current mission 3.00E-02 is Probability of a single channel failing blind 1.47E-08 is Probability of a both channels failing blind in the same CIBU SIL 3 Beam Interlock System Strategy

  11. And another thing • It’s very tedious calculating a FMECA like this • Bottom up, means you have to look through lists of components • It’s easy to make mistakes • It’s all based on a lot of assumptions, and speculation • Maintainability • From the FMECA it’s relatively simple to derive the Maintainability of the system… Just have to calculate the repair times… • On my list of things to do Beam Interlock System Strategy

  12. FIN Beam Interlock System Strategy

More Related