Download
1 / 36
360 likes | 413 Views
Post Structural Approaches To Discourse. Paul Ricoeur Provided one of the first, definitive criticisms of structuralism. Others include Anthony Giddens, Pierre Bourdieu. Ricoeur:. Structure Word Event LANGUAGE is an object for an empirical science
E N D
Post Structural Approaches To Discourse Paul Ricoeur Provided one of the first, definitive criticisms of structuralism. Others include Anthony Giddens, Pierre Bourdieu.
Ricoeur: • Structure Word Event • LANGUAGE is an object for an empirical science • WITHIN LANGUAGE two sciences: one of states of the system one of changes • IN A (SYNCHRONIC) system there are no absolute terms. • THE SIGNS MUST be maintained as a closed system. • THE SIGN: UNITY of signifier and signified. - doesn't stand for a thing.
Structuralism Defined • IF WE HAVE CORRECTLY separated a language from speech, the states of a system from the history of changes, the form from the substance, and the closed system of signs from all references to a world, we must define the sign not only by its relation to all other signs of the same level but also in itself as a purely internal (or immanent) difference. • STRUCTURALISM can thus be defined as the complete awareness of the exigencies contained in this series of presuppositions. • THE ISOLATED NATURE of langue.
Speech: Discourse • [TO USERS language i.e.,] Speech is not an object, but a mediator [a means to communicate]. • TO SPEAK is to act [this is termed the issue of "agency"]. • TO SPEAK is to overcome the closure of signs in the intention of saying something about something to someone. • TO SPEAK is the act by which language moves beyond itself,..toward its reference and toward its opposite. [In use,] Language (langue) seeks to disappear; it seeks to die as an object [in favor of parole]. • THE SYSTEM (langue) has no outside, it is an autonomous entity of internal dependencies. • THIS [STRUCTURALISM] is a methodological decision which does violence to (linguistic) experience.
The Task. • To reconstruct the understanding of language • To reclaim for the understanding of language what the structural model excluded and what perhaps is language itself as act of speech, as saying. • To develop a phenomenology of speech as opposed to a science of language. • Our task appears to be to go all the way with the antinomy (opposition). • This would involve producing: • the act of speech at the very center of a language, • in a fashion of a setting forth meaning, • of a dialectical production, which makes • the system occur as an act and • the structure an event.
Fairclough: Language and Power • Power: What is it? • Foucault: Power versus Domination • Power implies control but is not necessarily bad.\ • Domination implies the exploitation of one person by another. • Critical Language Study • Critical means a careful look at language, power and ideology.
Fairclough: Language and Power • ABOUT CONNECTIONS BETWEEN language use and unequal relations of power (domination). • IN CONTRAST to sociolinguistic studies which have generally set out to describe prevailing sociolinguistic conventions in terms of how they distribute power unequally; they have not set out to explain these conventions as the product of relations of power and struggles for power. • MAIN FOCUS ON trying to explain existing conventions as the outcome of power relations and power struggle.
Comments from papers • The nature of parole • Saussure’s version very limited “the executive side of language” • More recent views expand it into communication (discourse) • Question of the subject (structuralism v. poststructuralism. • Ricoeur wrote this when we didn’t have a very good idea of syntax.
Papers Continued • Mead v. Whorf • Role – Self – different societies. • Fairclough’s Critical Discourse Analysis • How do disenfranchised groups react to common sense?
CLS and other disciplines • LINGUISTICS • LINGUISTICS HAS GIVEN relatively little attention to actual speech or writing; it has characterized language as a potential, a system, an abstract competence, rather than attempting to describe actual language practice. • THESE ASSUMPTIONS AND the neglect of language practice result in an idealized view of language, which isolates it from the social and historical matrix outside of which it cannot actually exist. • Sociolinguistics [narrow sense] • Shows systematic correlations between variations in linguistic form (...) and social variables.
Sociolinguistics [continued] • Heavily influenced by `positivist' conceptions of social science: sociolinguistic variation … tends to be seen in terms of sets of facts to be observed using methods analogous to those of natural science. • Strong on `what?' questions (the facts of <SL> variation?) but weak on `why?' and `how?' questions • Why are the facts as they are? How, in terms of the development of social relationships of power, was the existing sociolinguistic order brought into being?; how is it sustained? How might it be changed to the advantage of those who are dominated by it? • SL has often described SL conventions in terms of what are the `appropriate' linguistic forms for a given social situation; whatever the intention, this terminology is likely to lend legitimacy to `the facts' and their underlying power relations.
Sociolinguistics Continued • Key insight: language seen as form of action (this insight is incorporated into CLS • Main weakness is its individualism • Action is thought of as atomistically as emanating wholly from the individual, and is often conceptualized in terms of the `strategies' adopted by the individual speaker to achieve her `goals' or `intentions'. • Gives the implausible impression that conventionalized ways of speaking or writing or `reinvented' on each occasion of their use by the speaker.... • The result is an idealized and utopian image of verbal interaction which is in stark contrast with the image offered by CLS of a SL order molded in social struggles and riven <torn apart> with inequalities of power.
Cognitive Psychology And Artificial Intelligence • Stresses the importance and active nature of comprehension. • you do not simply `decode' an utterance, you arrive at an interpretation through an active process of matching features of the utterance at various levels with representations you have stored in your long-term memory. • Have given little attention to the social origins or significance of member's resources <similar to context>>. • STRENGTHS: works with extended samples of real conversation. • [But] has been resistant to making connections between such `micro' structures of conversation and the `macro' structures of social institutions and societies. • Similar to pragmatics, it gives a rather implausible image of conversation as a skilled social practice existing in a social vacuum.
SOME RECENT SOCIAL THEORY • WORK ON IDEOLOGY: Increasing relative importance of ideology as a mechanism of power in modern society. • FOUCAULT: has ascribed a central role to discourse in the development of specifically modern forms of power. • HABERMAS: theory of communicative action highlights the way in which our currently distorted communication nevertheless foreshadows communication without such constraints. • ALL SHARE THE DEFECT of being theoretical and not over-rationalized to apply to specific instances of discourse.
RELATIONSHIP OF CLS to these approaches. • SEEN AS COMPLEMENTING other approaches. • CLS OBJECTS to the langue centered presumption of the state of the discipline.
Main Points • Power and Struggle • Power versus Domination (Foucault) • Members’ Resources (Bourdieau) Capital • Power Behind Language (Grammar) • Power In language (Discourse) • The Social Construction of the Text • Subject Position (Roles)
P=Policeman; W=Witness P: Did you get a look at the one in the car? W: I saw his face, yeah. P: What sort of age was he? W: About 45. H was wearing a …. P: And how tall? W: Six foot one. P: Six foot one. Hair? W: Dark and curly. Is this going to take long? I’ve got to collect the kids from school. P: Not much longer, no. What about his clothes? W: He was a bit scruffy-looking, blue trousers, black … P: Jeans? W: Yeah. Example of Police Interview: Power
Example of School Master Interview. struggle • H: Why didn’t you go straight down Queen Street? • Y: I’m not walking down there with a load of coons from St. Hilda’s coming out of school. • H: Why’s that. • Y: Well that’s obvious, isn’t it. I don’t want to get belted. • H: Well there isn’t usually any bother in Queen Street is there? • Y: No. None of us white kids usually go down there, do we? What about that bust-up in the Odeon carpark at Christmas? • H: That was nearly a year ago, and I’m not convinced you lot were as innocent as you made out. So when you got to the square, why did you wait around for a quarter of an hour instead of going strait home? • Y: I thought my mate might come down that way after work. Anyway, we always go down the square after school.
Three Pillars of Thacherism: (Authoritarian Populism) Authoritarian: Traditionally Conservative • attempt to strengthen the power of the state in areas of: police, military, law and order. • commitment to free market, free enterprise (protect industry from interference from government, labour unions) Populist: • Direct appeal to ordinary people as part of the project. • Whatever is said in #1 and #2 must be put in terms that ordinary people can relate to. • authoritarian: government needed for: law and order, anti crime, drugs, control unions. • free enterprise: government not needed for: regulating business, protecting environment, • Supports other positions of ordinary people • where it does not interfere with Authoritarian position. • thus: pro religion, pro family • Strategy: • Add to this an aggressive strategy of never backing away from a position, no matter how ridiculous or indefensible.
Things to watch for in the text. • Shifting Discourses • Shifting Pronouns • Literal meanings of pronouns v usage.
Michael Charlton and Margaret ThatcherBBC Radio 3, 17 December 1985. MC Prime Minister, you were at Oxford in the nineteen forties and after the war Britain would embark on a period of relative prosperity, for all the like of which, it had hardly known, but today there are three and a quarter million unemployed, and e:m Britain's economic performance by one measurement has fallen to the rank of Italy. Now can you imagine yourself back at the university today? What must seem to be the chances in Britain and the prospects for all now? MT They are very different worlds you're talking about, because the first thing that struck me very forcibly, as you were speaking of those days, was, now, we do enjoy a standard of living which was undreamed of then, and I can remember Rab Butler saying, after we returned to power in about 1951-52, that if we played our cards right, the standard of living within twenty five years would be twice as high as it was then, and em he was just about right, and it was remarkable, because it was something that we had never thought of. Now I don't think now one would necessarily think wholly in material terms, indeed, I think it's wrong to think in material terms because really the kind of country you want is made up by the strength of its It is its people. Do they run their industries well? Are their human relations good? e: Do they respect law and order? Are their families strong, All of those kinds of things. | And you know, it's just way beyond economics.
Tannen and Wallat:Interactive Frames and Knowledge Schemas • Linguistic Register: • Teasing, reporting, conversational • Frame: • a sense of what activity is being engaged in • how speakers mean what they say) • Footing; • how participants negotiate interpersonal relationships • A change of footing often signals a change in frame. • Knowledge Schemas: • expectations about people, objects, events and settings in the world,as distinguished from alignments (footing).
A Semiological Reinterpretation • Register, Frame and Knowledge Schema • The register is the signifier of different signs (aka Frames) • Examples: Teasing, reporting, conversational • The Knowledge Schema is the signifed. It indicates the type of context in which the discourse is taking place and provides the knowledge that is needed to interpret it. • “In order to comprehend any utterance, a listener (and a speaker) must know within which frame it is intended: for example, is this joking? Is it fighting?” • expectations about people, objects, events and settings in the world, • Fairclough and Foucault would call this an order of discourse.
Tannen and Wallat continued • Footing; • how participants negotiate interpersonal relationships • A change of footing often signals a change in frame. • Involves roles (Subject positions and relations) and members resources (Fairclough) • Social Interactions • Conversations commonly involve the shifting of frames.
Conflicting Frames The mother’s question invoked the consultation frame, requiring the doctor to give the mother the information based on her medical knowledge, plus take into account the effect on the mother of the information that the child’s life is in danger. Notice that it is admirable that the doctor’s sensitivity makes her aware of the need to use both frames
Mismatched Schemas … the pediatritian has a schema for cerebral palsy: In she knows what a child with CP can be expected to do or not do… contrast, as emerged in discussion during a staff meeting, the mother has little experience with other cp children, so she can only compare Jody’s condition and development to non CP people
Tannen • Different Interact ional Styles • Role of interruptions • Zimmerman and West versus Tannen • Different Cultural Norms
Interruptions F: How often does your acting group work? M: Do you mean how often do we rehearse or how often do we perform? F: ->Both M: [Laughs uneasily] F: Why are you laughing? M: Because of the way you said it. It was like a bullet. Is that why your marriage broke? F: What? M: Because of your aggressiveness.
Tannen: Properties of JCS • Topic: a) prefer personal topics, b) shift topics abruptly, c) introduce topics without hesitance, d) persist if new topic is not picked up, reintroduce it, repeatedly if necessary. • Genre: a) tell more stories, b) tell stories in rounds, c) internal evaluation is preferred over external. Evaluation < Labov’s Narrational analysis. Internal (in the story); external: stated explicitly) • Pacing: a) faster rate of speech, b) inner-turn pauses avoided (silence is regarded as lack of rapport), c) faster turn taking, d) cooperative overlap and participatory listenership. • Expressive paralinguistics: a) expressive phonology, b) pitch and amplitude shifts, c) marked voice quality, d) strategic within-turn pauses.
Examples Wife: John’s having a party. Wanna go? Husband: OK. Later Wife: Are you sure you want to go to the party? Husband: OK, let’s not go. I’m too tired anyway. • Indirect: My wife wants to go to this party, since she asked, I’ll go to make her happy. • Direct: My wife is asking if I want to go to the party. I feel like going so I’ll say yes.
Exam Questions • What are three ways that Structuralism and Poststructuralism differ? • ____________ • ____________ • ____________ • How would a poststructuralist address the question of language and thought.
