440 likes | 605 Views
Captives Formation: How and When. Charlie Woodman , CPA SVP, Risk Finance Marsh CAS Ratemaking Seminar March 27, 2003. André Lefebvre, FCAS, MAAA Credit & Market Risk Executive Royal & SunAlliance. Discussion Points. Risk and Risk Financing Perspectives Single Parent Captive
E N D
Captives Formation: How and When Charlie Woodman, CPA SVP, Risk Finance Marsh CAS Ratemaking Seminar March 27, 2003 André Lefebvre, FCAS, MAAA Credit & Market Risk Executive Royal & SunAlliance
Discussion Points • Risk and Risk Financing Perspectives • Single Parent Captive • Group Approach • Critical Considerations • Stop us at any time for questions
Buydown Debt/ Reacquire Equity Opportunity Capital Allocation / Budgeting / Revaluation Operating Cash Flows / Strain on Working Capital Frequency of loss Capital / Resources At Risk Expected loss Unexpected loss Stress loss Amount of loss Risk / Capital Relationship
Universe of Risk Finance From the Insured’s Perspective • Risk Transfer • Becomes someone else’s risk • Risk Funding Efficiencies • Our risk, our balance sheet, more cost and timing efficient • Off-Balance Sheet • Our risk, someone else’s balance sheet • “Planet Killer” Protection • Our risk, our balance sheet, save our lives.
Captive Insurance Company - Defined • An Insurance Company, typically owned by non-insurance parent(s), insuring the risks or interests of its owner(s) • Incorporated, Regulated, Capitalized and Accountable • May or May not be a replacement for insurance. Depends on Form (ownership and insured relationship) • Emphasizes the ‘Insurance Transaction’ • Insurance Company Operations
Captive Insurance Company - Forms • Single Parent - Non Risk Pooling • Wholly-owned, Rent-A-Captive, Trusts • Emphasis on Risk Funding and Cost / Funding Efficiencies • Group Owned- Risk Sharing / Risk Pooling • Group, Association Captive, Risk Retention Group • Emphasis on Risk Transfer replacement / Alternative “insurance” • This distinction is critical in assessing the merits of a program.
Risk Transfer Risk Funding First Dollar Risk Transfer Guaranteed Cost Single Parent Captives Rent-a-Captive / Cell Facilities Self-insurance Trusts Group Captives Pools RRGs Reciprocal Exchanges Spectrum of Risk Finance
Current Captive Insurance Program Emphases • Cost Savings • Risk Management Facilitation • Business Enhancement • Insurance / Risk Transfer Replication (Group Emphasis)
Single Parent Captive Reality • Individual Reporting Concern and a Consolidated Entity • A Single-Parent Captive Insurance Subsidiary, insuring the risks of the parent and affiliated operating brother-sister concerns, is only self-insurance in its most sophisticated form. • Risk Retention Levels and Captive Utilization are two different considerations. • If a concern cannot afford to increase its risk retention levels without a captive, then they certainly cannot afford to assume more risk with one. • No one needs a captive insurance subsidiary.
Current Single Parent Captive Insurance Program Emphases • Cost Savings • Risk Management Facilitation • Business Enhancement
Cost Savings • Long-term: “Seasoning” / Risk Management Point Facility • Short-term: “Business Case”
Seasoning • “Seasoning” / Risk Management Point Facility • Extends the Corporate Risk Management “Commitment” to It’s Own Risks • Engages in Insurance under the Insurance Industry’s Mechanisms and Measurements • Regulated and “Grounded” • Reinforces Relationships with (Re)insurance Markets • Hard to quantify
How (Re)insurers evaluate captives as Risk Partners • Where domiciled • How long in existence • Strength of captive’s financials • Who manages captive • Insurance program dynamics • Actuarial support • Owner proactivity and commitment
Business Case • NPV of Cash Flows - Short Term Business Case cost Savings • Accelerated Tax Benefits - Qualified Insurer • State (& International) Tax Arbitrage • Operating Costs • Opportunity Cost of Capital • Other Quantitative & Qualitative
Tax Reality • The underlying issues which define whether an insurance transaction has occurred or whether a transaction is self-funding are: • “Insurance Risk” - Insurer must assume a reasonable possibility of incurring significant loss. • Notions of Risk - Form • Risk Transfer / Risk Distribution - Risk of loss must be legally transferred from one legal entity to another, which pools the risk among other risks so as to increase predictability, and reduce adverse loss uncertainty.
Accelerated Tax Benefits - Qualified Insurer • Insurance Premiums are Deductible over the policy term • “Casualty” losses are subject to “Economic Performance” for tax • Accounts and “set-asides” are not economic performance • Incurred Basis (incl. IBNR) vs. Paid Basis • SubChapter L of the IRC • Accelerated Recognition, not an accelerated realization • i.e. Already recognized for financial reporting • No “above the line” accounting benefit • Consolidated Cash Flow Benefit • Note: Basis of tax benefit is actual premium deduction from insured to Group Captive
Other Business Case Components • State (& International) Tax Arbitrage • Operating Costs • WACC / Opportunity Cost of Capital • Capitalization • Losses as Premiums • Discount rate on enhanced cash flows • Other Quantitative & Qualitative • (Re)insurance • Internal Costs & Resource Commitment • Recognitions and Materiality • Corporate Culture
Captive Operating Costs • Start-up • Fronting, if applicable. • Management • Measurement: Audit & Actuarial • Legal & Regulatory • (Re)insurance • Pools and Participations • Premium-based Taxes • Direct / Reinsurance • Federal Excise Taxes • Self-procurement / Direct placement.
Design Components and Issues • Coverages • Structure • Direct Writer • Reinsurer • Capitalization & Collateral • Domicile • Cost • Regulatory • Other • Premiums & Operating Expenses • Premium Taxation
Program Evaluation or “Feasibility” • Risk Assessment / Self-Assessment • Insurance Marketplace • Risk Quantification • Qualitative Issues • Pro Forma • Structure & Design • Time - Urgency versus Commitment • Capital • Cultural
Underwriting • Traditional risk • Professional Liability/Medical Malpractice • Workers compensation, auto and general liability • Products/completed operations, errors & omissions, environmental • D&O, Surety, Property? • Employee Benefits: Voluntary LTD, Optional Life, Health coverages?
Estimated Operating Expenses - Single Parent • Start-up costs - $50k • Annual Captive Management Fee - $50 - 75k • Annual Assurance • Audit - $15k • Actuarial - $25k • Legal & Regulatory - $15k • Premium Tax (if applicable) • US Federal Excise Tax - Avoided under IRC Sec. 953(d) ‘domesticating election’ • Other (I.e. Annual General Meetings, travel, etc.) - $10k
Other Considerations • Operational • Directors & Officers • Committees • Meeting Structure & Timing • Financial • Timing, Distribution & Format • Investments • Structural for Group Emphasis • Fronted / Reinsurance • Retro rated • Capitalization • Administrative • Consensus, Agreement, Voice, Relevance, Commitment
Group Captive Reality • A Group Captive is dependent on its members and its advisors. • Risks of the few may become the risks of the many. • The Assets of the many may become the assets of the few. • The goal is the replication and replacement of insurance and a group purchase of excess coverages / reinsurance • Can be a problem to insurers, due to risk concentration. • Works best when the ‘motivation’ is high. • Industry abandonment or extreme over-pricing. • Commitment to changing industry risk practices. • Creating a group “voice.” • Communication and consensus already exists or a centralizing entity coordinates the efforts.
$1,000,000 Specific Reinsurance $400,000 Severity Fund $200,000 Aggregate Reinsurance Frequency Fund $25,000 Deductible Quantification is Critical • Especially in the Group Captive • In any transaction, if Garbage In, then Garbage Out. • Assessment and Quantification • Counter-party risk will exist in a group environment • Will form the bulk of premium determination and payment terms • Will dictate design and risk layers • Will define flexibilities
Actuarial Issues • Retention Level • Attachment Point • Per Occurrence Limit • Aggregate Limit • Pricing • Pure Premium • Expenses • Profit & Contingency • Dynamic Financial Analysis
Factors Influencing Retention Level • Financial Wherewithal of the Insured • Financial Wherewithal of Insurers • Risk Philosophies • Insurance Market Conditions • Cost / Benefit Analysis
Risk Transfer Savings Current Program Risk The Risk Finance Frontier The Efficient Frontier 1 Risk Financing Alternatives 1The efficient frontier is the point at which there is no greater expected reward for a given level of risk, and vice versa
$500,000Retention $1,000,000Retention UnlimitedRetention Retention Level Decisions: Appetite meets Opportunity
Auto Liability Workers Comp Products Liab. Property Multi-Risk Comparison
Retained Risk @ 85th Percentile - Risks Treated In Combination Retained Risk @ 85th Percentile - Risks Treated In Isolation “Portfolio Effect”
Common Characteristics of All Captives The Retention Defined amount of losses to be retained and funded through the captive $1MM per loss $1MM/$3MM $3MM per year - Aggregate Losses Retained
Common Characteristics Excess / Risk Transfer If available and / or affordable / reasonable $MM Specific Excess/ $MM Aggregate $1MM/$3MM
Alternatives Segregated Cell Segregated cell captive with individual excess coverage Individual Limits $3MM/ $18MM $5MM/ $8MM $1MM/ $3MM $3MM/ $16MM $2MM/ $9MM HG 1 HG 2 HG 3 HG 4 HG 5
Common Characteristics Group Pooling Group captive with shared excess coverage Combined Limits $3MM/ $18MM $5MM/ $8MM $1MM/ $3MM $3MM/ $16MM $2MM/ $9MM HG 1 HG 2 HG 3 HG 4 HG 5
$1,000,000 Specific Reinsurance $400,000 Severity Fund $200,000 Aggregate Reinsurance Frequency Fund $25,000 Deductible Group Captive
Pricing Issues • Similar to Pricing • “High Deductible” • “Excess Reinsurance” • Methodology • Traditional methods • Aggregate • Frequency / Severity • Monte Carlo simulation models
Pricing Issues - Cont’d • Data • Use insured own experience • Supplement using “industry” data • Similar company/industry • Bureau • Correlation of Risks • Risk Loads • Captives which only insure the risks of the parent and affiliates / subsidiaries are only self-insurance in its most sophisticated form (i.e., no real risk transfer)
Dynamic Financial Analysis • DFA’s goal is to provide management with: • solid information about the interaction of decisions from all areas of company operations; • a quantitative look at the risk-and-return trade-offs inherent in emerging strategic opportunities; and • a structured process for evaluating alternative operating plans. • Captive insurance companies are well-suited for DFA application
Conclusion • Questions Thank you