E N D
1. The Progress of ICH
C. Michelle Limoli, Pharm. D
June 2010
VICH Conference
2. International Conference on Harmonisation
3. Three Regions, Six Parties
4. Expert Working Groups STEERING COMMITTEE
Monitors and Facilitates EWGS
6. Over 60 ICH Guidelines Efficacy 9 topics/ 21 guidelines
Safety - 9 topics/14 guidelines
Quality - 10 topics/36 guidelines
Medical Dictionary - MedDRA
Electronic Standards - ESTRI, E2B
Common Technical Document - CTD
Guidelines extend over entire product life cycle
7. Regulators Concerns About CTD Initially the ICH regulators were resistant to change to their submission format
Regulators felt it would be too disruptive to their review process
They needed to be convinced there was value in harmonizing the submission format
A feasibility study was requested of industry
8. Industry Resource Survey Conducted in May 1996
The survey evaluated the time it took to convert an FDA NDA into an EMEA submission (and the reverse)
It also evaluated the number and types of staff needed to carry out the conversion of submission formats
9. Conversion Times
10. Staff Needed for Conversion
11. Conclusion: Tackle CTD Regulators realized the amount of time and energy needed to rearrange paper from one ICH region submission format to another
Conversion caused a delay in submitting an application to that ICH region
Resulted in delayed access to new innovative medicines for patients in that region
12.
One of the integrating uniform numbering system for the entire CTD.
measures that was agreed to in May was a Here we have a refinement of the CTD pyramid reflecting that system.
One of the integrating uniform numbering system for the entire CTD.
measures that was agreed to in May was a Here we have a refinement of the CTD pyramid reflecting that system.
13. Benefits of the CTD - FDA Perspective More reviewable applications
More logical order of presentation
Follows development scheme
More predictable format
More consistent reviews
Easier analysis across applications
Easier exchange of information
Facilitates electronic submissions
15. Electronic Submissions
16. Summary-Influence of the CTD/eCTD The CTD format of a submission influences the content of a review by imposing a consistent order of information and data provided
The CTD shapes both the conduct of the review and the presentation of the results of the review
Consistency of CTD format should promote consistent review practices (GRPs) and efficiency
As more countries utilize ICH guidelines and the CTD format a common regulatory language will evolve promoting interactions between regulatory authorities
17. CTD Timeframe CTD signed off November 2000
Mandatory in EU and Japan and Highly Recommended by FDA July 2003
Less than five years later eCTD and review templates!
Lightening speed in government time!
18. ICH Outreach Efforts:Global Cooperation Group Created in 1999 to address increasing interest by non-ICH parties in ICH guidelines and operations
Facilitates dissemination of information on ICH activities, guidelines and their use
GCG underlying principle: ICH will not seek to impose its views--rather, GCG will serve as resource for information
Four brochures published on ICH and GCG, available at ICH website
19. ICH GCG Members Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation (APEC)
Australia, Brunel Darussalam, Canada, Chile, Peoples Republic of China, Hong Kong, China, Indonesia, Japan, Republic of Korea, Malaysia, Mexico, New Zealand, Papua New Guinea, Peru, Philippines, Russia, Singapore, Chinese Taipei, Thailand, United States, Vietnam
Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN)
Brunel Darussalam, Cambodia, Indonesia, Laos, Malaysia, Myanmar, Philippines, Singapore, Thailand, Vietnam
The Cooperation Council for the Arab States of the Gulf (GCC)
United Arab Emirates, Bahrain, Saudi Arabia, Oman, Qatar, Kuwait
Pan American Network for Drug Regulatory Harmonization (PANDRH)
Regulators from PAHO/WHO, Regulatory Associations of the Pharmaceutical Industry, NAFTA, SICA, CARICOM, MERCOSUR, TLCA, Consumer Groups, Academia, Regional Professials Associations, Latin American Association for Integration (ALADI), The Andean Community
Southern African Development Community (SADC)
Angola, Botswana, Democratic Republic of Congo, Lesotho, Madagascar, Malawi, Mauritius, Mozambique, Narribia, Seychelles, South Africa, Swaziland, United Republic of Tanzania, Zambia, Zimbabwe
20. Shift in Focus for GCG:
Initial focus on information-sharing
Soon became clear that more active engagement was necessary to respond to increasing interest in ICH and ICH guidelines
November 2003:
An Important Milestone
Endorsement by ICH SC of new Mandate and Terms of Reference that call for
The ongoing participation of regional harmonization initiatives
Greater transparency
21. GCG Mission Statement Finalized 2003: To promote a mutual understanding of regional initiatives in order to facilitate harmonization processes related to ICH guidelines regionally and globally; and to strengthen the capacity of drug regulatory authorities and industry to utilize them.
22. Regulators Forum Initiated in 2008
ICH Regulators, GCG and regulators of Australia, China, Chinese Taipei, India, Korea
Assist with implementing ICH guidelines
Regulators only
Met for the first time prior to ICH meetings in Portland, June 9, 2008
Created to promote discussion and sharing of best practices among regulatory authorities on issues related to the implementation of ICH guidelines and impact on regulatory systems
The Regulators Forum will complement activities and objectives of GCG
23. ICH Week
24. ICHAct Strategically: New Topics
Maintenance Mode
25. Maintenance Mode Continued Modernization
Updating Guidelines
Strengthening Partnerships:
WHO
Pharmacopeias
SDOs
26.