1 / 23

MEBT dump

MEBT dump. Thermo- mechanical analysis 15 March 2012. Melanie DELONCA – EN/STI – Mechanical Engineering. O utline. Preliminary considerations Preliminary design Material configuration Material properties Methodology of analysis Thermo-structural analysis One pulse Analysis

toyah
Download Presentation

MEBT dump

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. MEBT dump Thermo-mechanicalanalysis 15 March 2012 Melanie DELONCA – EN/STI – Mechanical Engineering M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  2. Outline • Preliminary considerations • Preliminary design • Material configuration • Material properties • Methodology of analysis • Thermo-structural analysis • One pulse Analysis • Steady State Analysis • Buckling • Overview of other devices • Thermal Behavior • Summarize of results M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  3. Preliminary consideration • The MEBT dump is located in the injection line (7 MeV) • The study focus on the three part of the MEBT dump: • The dump core • The U-shape part • The shaft M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  4. Preliminary design Dump core U-Shape Shaft Design as from K. Asvestas M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  5. Material configuration • Initial material configuration: • Dump core: Tungsten • U-Shape: Aluminium • Shaft: Stainless Steel • Alternative configuration: • Dump core: Tungsten • U-Shape and Shaft: All Aluminium/ All copper/ All Stainless Steel M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  6. Material Properties Note: the emissivity values are taken for not surface treated material (oxidation/polishing/…) and have to be checked after final choice and configuration of the material M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  7. Methodology of analysis M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  8. M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  9. One pulse analysis ΔT Max = 84,9 °C ΔT Max analytical = 85 °C Melting point = 3410 °C Note: no Fluka simulation were used for all the thermal analysis. ¼ of the geometry • Increase of temperature for one-pulse M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  10. Steady State analysis • Evaluation of TCC: • Between the Shaft and the U-Shape, the contact is considered as perfect • TCC = 10 000 W/m2K • Between the Dump core and the U-Shape: pressure of contact estimated at about 11 Mpa • The TCC between two surfaces depends on the pressure of contact and the material properties M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  11. Steady State analysis U-Shape : Aluminium Shaft : S. Steel U-Shape : Aluminium Shaft : Aluminium TmaxTu= 70,8 °C TmaxAl = 58 °C TmaxSS = 56 °C TmaxTu= 62,8 °C TmaxAl = 50 °C half of the geometry half of the geometry M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  12. Steady State analysis U-Shape : Copper Shaft : Copper U-Shape : S. Steel Shaft : S. Steel TmaxTu= 54,6 °C TmaxCu = 51 °C TmaxTu= 49,4 °C Tmax SS= 45 °C half of the geometry half of the geometry M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  13. Steady State analysis Reminder: • Summarize of results M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  14. Buckling analysis σ due to proper weigh of the set “dump core + U-shape” = 1,1 MPa Best material choice : Stainless Steel • Considering the geometry: risk of buckling M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  15. Conclusion for MEBT dump • The best material choice is to have the U-Shape and the Shaft with the same material. The Stainless Steel seems to be a good candidate. • The emissivity value of the material will have to be checked with the supplier since it can have a significant impact on the results. • To ensure a good heat evacuation, the contact between the dump core and the U-Shape has to be properly ensured. • Considering the increase of temperature, the thermal stresses are not an issue. However, it is advised to use a spring washer to partially limit a part of the stresses due to the thermal expansion. M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  16. Other devices • The others devices of the facility: • The Scarpers: located in the Synchrotron • The internal beam Dumps: located in the Synchrotron • The chopper dump: located in the extraction line • The Beam Stopper: located in the extraction line • The EX dump: located in the extraction line M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  17. Thermal behavior 1 Pulse: Steady State: TmaxAl= 33,1 °C Tmax.use Al = 160 °C TmaxAl= 30 °C Tmax.use Al = 160 °C TmaxTotal= 63,1 °C NB: results from K. Asvestas The contact between the two parts is assumed perfect. The scrapers: Aluminium core, Stainless Steel shaft M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  18. Thermal behavior Steady State: 1 Pulse: TmaxGr= 22,1 °C Tmax.use Gr = 3800 °C TmaxGr= 27,1 °C Tmax.use Gr = 3800 °C TmaxTotal= 49,2 °C NB: results from K. Asvestas The contact between the two parts is assumed perfect. The Chopper dump: Core in graphite, external part in Tungsten, metallic support M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  19. Thermal behavior 1 Pulse: Steady State: TmaxTu= 22,9 °C Tmax.use Tu= 927 °C TmaxTu= 115,5 °C Tmax.use Tu= 927 °C TmaxTotal= 138,4 °C NB: results from K. Asvestas The contact between the two parts is assumed perfect. The Internal dump: core in Tungsten, metallic spacers M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  20. Thermal behavior 1 Pulse: TmaxTu= 22,2 °C Tmax.use Tu= 927 °C NB: results from K. Asvestas The Beam Stopper: Tungsten M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  21. Thermal behavior 1 Pulse: Steady State: TmaxIr= 24,2 °C Tmax.use Ir= 1530 °C TmaxIr= 22,5 °C Tmax.use Ir= 1530 °C TmaxTotal= 46,7 °C NB: results from K. Asvestas The contact between the three parts are assumed perfect. The Ex dump: Core in graphite, second part in Iron M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  22. Summarize of results • Next step: the pre-calculation already performed may be sufficient. However, it is advised to study more carefully the Scrapers and the Internal dump. M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

  23. Thankyou for your attention. M. Delonca EN/STI - BID Workpackage Review - March 2012

More Related