180 likes | 303 Views
MIDWESTERN INTERMEDIATE UNIT IV October 24, 2006. Responsiveness to Intervention: An integrated approach to service delivery that encompasses general and special education Beth Glew, School Psychologist, MIU IV. Agenda Definition of Response to Intervention Foundations in Research and Policy
E N D
Responsiveness to Intervention: An integrated approach to service delivery that encompasses general and special education Beth Glew, School Psychologist, MIU IV
Agenda • Definition of Response to Intervention • Foundations in Research and Policy • Improved Practices that Support Response to Intervention • Core Principles of Response to Intervention • Problem Solving Method • Response to Intervention in Practice • Tiered Models
Response to Intervention (RtI) • High quality instruction and intervention • Learning rates and level of performance • Educational decisions
Research and Policy • National Institute for Child Health and Development (NICHD) Studies • National Reading Panel • National Research Council Panel on Minority Overrepresentation • National Summit on Learning Disabilities • President’s Commission on Excellence in Research
Problems in the Traditional System • Separation of special education from general education • Undocumented benefits and use of research based practices • Eligibility determination variability and accuracy • Integration of eligibility determination and instruction • Failure of traditional assumptions
Improved Practices that Support RtI • Scientifically based curricula and instruction • Multi-tier models • Progress monitoring and formative evaluation • Analysis and remediation of achievement problems • Functional behavioral assessment/analysis • Standard treatment protocol interventions
Core Principles of RtI • We can effectively teach all children • Intervene early • Use a multi-tier model of service delivery • Use a problem solving method to make decisions within a tier model
Define the Problem Define Problem/Measuring Behavior Problem Analysis Validate Problem Identify Variables that Contribute to Problem Develop Plan Evaluate Response to Intervention (RtI) Implement Plan Implement As Intended Progress Monitor Modify as Necessary Problem Solving Method
Core Principles of RtI • Use research based, scientifically validated interventions/instruction • Monitor student progress to inform instruction • Use DATA to make decisions • Use assessment for three different purposes
What RtI Looks Like in Practice Versus Typical Past Practice
80-90% School-Wide Interventions 80-90% School-Wide Interventions F B A E D C Integrated Systems Model for Academics and Behavior Academic Systems Behavioral Systems Decisions about tiers of support are data-based Adapted from OSEP Effective School-Wide Interventions
5-10% Intensive Interventions 5-10% Intensive Interventions 80-90% School-Wide Interventions 80-90% School-Wide Interventions F B A E D C Integrated Systems Model for Academics and Behavior Academic Systems Behavioral Systems
1-5% Intensive Individualized Interventions 1-5% Intensive Individualized Interventions 5-10% Intensive Interventions 5-10% Intensive Interventions 80-90% School-Wide Interventions 80-90% School-Wide Interventions F B A E D C Integrated Systems Model for Academics and Behavior Academic Systems Behavioral Systems
Problem Solving Model HIGH Level IV Special education IEP Intense Level III Tertiary Prevention moderate Treatment Intensity Level II Secondary Prevention modification, practice, and reinforcement Level I Primary Prevention Class/Schoolwide HIGH LOW Unresponsiveness to Intervention
How long does it take to implement fully the problem-solving/RtI process? • Evidence from Iowa and Minnesota would suggest that it takes 4-6 years (or more) to complete full implementation. • Full implementation includes: • policy and regulatory change • staff development • development of building/program procedures
“When the only tool you have is a hammer, the whole world looks like a nail.”