1 / 23

Weather Derivatives

1 A MERICAN R E 4. Weather Derivatives. Sean Devlin ACAS, MAAA CAS Annual Meeting November 1999. Topics. What is the Product Who are the Customers How is the Business Transacted How is the Deal Priced What are the Risk Management Controls Future. Product.

tpetillo
Download Presentation

Weather Derivatives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 1AMERICAN RE4 Weather Derivatives Sean Devlin ACAS, MAAA CAS Annual Meeting November 1999

  2. Topics • What is the Product • Who are the Customers • How is the Business Transacted • How is the Deal Priced • What are the Risk Management Controls • Future

  3. Product Weather Derivatives provide coverage for the risk that the weather is different from the historical averages for a period of time

  4. Risks covered • Average Temperature - HDDs/CDDs • Abnormal Temperature - # Days above 90F • Precipitation/Snowfall • Snowpack • Windspeed • Riverflow • Barometric Pressure • Humidity • Combination of two or more of the above

  5. Customers • Energy Suppliers • Utilities • Municipalities • Individual Corporations • Agricultural Products • Airlines • Clothing Manufacturers and Retailers • Resorts • Beverage Companies

  6. How the Business is Transacted • Each contract has a stated limit • Risk is actively managed, traded and hedged • Transacted through SEC-licensed broker-dealer on public exchanges and in private transactions

  7. Why Not Use Insurance Policies? Insurers and reinsurers in the market are at a significant disadvantage due to: • More cumbersome and expensive insurance transaction. • Inability to hedge and manage risk efficiently. • No access to complete market data and trading strategies or other players.

  8. Transformed Deals Electric Company ISDA Agreement Bermuda Re Insurance Policy American Re Bermuda Re Reinsurance Treaty

  9. Sample Deal Problem: Phoenix Energy Company knows during hotter summers, the cost of producing abnormal amounts of electricity is extremely expensive. The company estimates that it loses $25,000 for every Cooling Degree Day (CDD*) above a certain threshold. Solution: Company takes out a CDD call option with an attachment point of cumulative 4600 CDDs. For every CDD above 4600, AmRe pays $25,000 with a limit of $10M. The temperature reference station is Phoenix Sky Harbor Airport. *CDD = Average Daily Temperature - 65

  10. Pricing: Underlying Data Step 1: • Collect and adjust data.Coverage is based on measured temperatures at fixed locations. • Time series needs to be adjusted due to biases Step 2: • Fit a distribution. Use adjusted measurements to determine the probability distribution of temperature index per season The Key to Pricing is Understanding the Data

  11. Pricing: Underlying Data • Time series needs to be adjusted due to bias in: • Surrounding environment • Measuring instrument • Climate change The Key to Pricing is Understanding the Data

  12. Pricing: Loss Distribution and Premium Step 3: No Loss Loss • Apply Contract Structure. Limit Attachment Point Step 4: • Determine Loss Distribution and Premium. • Obtain the loss distribution using transformed data obtained in Step 3 • Determine mean and standard deviation of loss distribution • Determine coverage premium by using a risk load factor that is a function of mean payoff, standard deviation, frictional costs, long term climate forecast and marginal impact on portfolio. Premium Mean Risk Load

  13. Pricing: Methodology • Black-Scholes Versus Actuarial-Based Pricing “Do the Black-Scholes Pricing Assumptions Apply to Weather Covers?” • Assumptions • Is the market liquid? • Are the mean and standard deviation time-independent? • Do arbitrage conditions exist (Put-Call parity)? • Is the underlying asset traded? • Does a lognormal distribution of the underlying asset exist? • Applicable • No (?) • No • No • No • No Actuarial Pricing Method is Most Appropriate

  14. Put Cover: Covers for accumulated index (CDD or HDD) being below a level. Puts and Calls • Call Cover: Covers for accumulated index (CDD or HDD) being Above a level.

  15. Trading Objectives 1AMERICAN RE4 • Objective is to establish a climate-neutral portfolio during a given season: • profit scenarios are slightly skewed but do not depend on very warm or very cold temperatures • we do not speculate on temperature • We seek to realize profits through: • taking advantage of the disparity of prices in geographic regions • creating positions by combining two or more contracts

  16. Underwriting and Investment Guidelines 1AMERICAN RE4 • The portfolio is subject to maximum trading limits based on Maximum Potential Economic Loss (MPEL) and Value at Risk (VaR). • MPEL aggregates the stated limit of all contracts. VaR reduces MPEL by taking into account the offsetting nature of correlated events. • The portfolio is also subject to certain other guidelines: • individual transaction size • counterparty exposure limits • contract length • minimum years of related weather data for analysis • regional exposure limits

  17. Portfolio Management Portfolio Risk Metrics • Expected Loss • Measure for mean of loss distribution • Expected Loss Ratio • Expected loss normalized by premiums: Mean/Total Premium • Median • 50% of losses will be less than this value; 50% are greater • Probable Maximum Loss (PML) • Measure for the tail of the loss distribution • Loss exceeded once every 100 years: • More appropriate measure of risk than variance for skewed distributions 1.0% of area to rightof PML PML Median Mean

  18. Portfolio’s Risk & Reward • Analyzed four portfolios, varying in spread of risk • Quantified the risk and reward parameters: • Capacity Consumption • Portfolio Uncertainty • Technical Gain

  19. Reward to Risk Ratio • Portfolio Reward - Premium less the expected loss • Portfolio Risk - Probable loss at a return period of 100 years Reward/Risk

  20. Coefficient of Variation • Coefficient of Variation (CV) - Ratio between portfolio’s standard deviation and its expected loss • CV reflects level of uncertainty or variability of the portfolio • Plot indicates that CVs decrease as capacity / volume of premiums increases, allowing for an optimal portfolio mix

  21. End Users Power Distributors Natural Gas Distributors Heating Oil Distributors Energy Consumers Energy Producers BROKER or DIRECT Investment Banks Commercial Banks Trading Companies Energy Marketers Reinsurance Companies Providers WEATHER MARKET PLAYERS

  22. Other Applications • Combining weather risk within overall risk management program. Dual trigger or combined retention programs. • Combining weather risk(volume) risk with commodity(price) risk, i.e. gas, oil, electricity. • Weather-linked debt to finance power generation equipment. • Offered as insurance or reinsurance contracts.

  23. Weather Market Outlook • Continued growth in frequency of transactions • Faster deal negotiations and closings • Larger sized, multi-year deals • Short-term monthly/weekly markets (e.g. CME) • International expansion • More participation by banks, financial intermediaries and consultants • More end user hedging participation • Retail weather products and services

More Related