1 / 18

Helene Andrea (PhD) 1 Roel Verheul (PhD) 2

The Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP) : A new dimensional questionnaire for measuring (mal)adaptive personality functioning. Helene Andrea (PhD) 1 Roel Verheul (PhD) 2 Joost Hutsebaut (PhD) 2 Dineke Feenstra (MSc) 1 Espen Arnevik (PhD) 3

tracen
Download Presentation

Helene Andrea (PhD) 1 Roel Verheul (PhD) 2

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. The Severity Indices of Personality Problems (SIPP):A new dimensional questionnaire for measuring (mal)adaptive personality functioning Helene Andrea (PhD)1 Roel Verheul (PhD)2 Joost Hutsebaut (PhD)2Dineke Feenstra (MSc)1Espen Arnevik (PhD)3 1 Viersprong Institute for Studies on Personality Disorders (VISPD), Halsteren, the Netherlands 2 Center for Psychotherapy de Viersprong, Halsteren, the Netherlands 3 Dept Research & Education, Ulleval University Hospital, Oslo, Norway APA Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 18 May 2009

  2. Contents Background Why a new questionnaire Psychometrics (factor structure, reliability) New results Discriminant validity (symptomatic measurements) Convergent validity (personality measurements) Sensitivity to change Discussion & further research

  3. Why a new questionnaire Dimensional measurement that combines: Broad scope of central elements personality pathology Relating maladaptive to adaptive capacities Developed to measure change Easy to administer (self-report & limited number of items) Verheul, Andrea et al (2008). Psychol Assessment, 20, 23-34

  4. Overview SIPP-questionnaire 118 items, 16 facets (subscales), 5 higher-order domains Lower score = more maladaptive level of functioning Higher score = more adaptive level of functioning Examples •     • FullydisagreePartlydisagreePartlyagreeFullyagree Website:http://hdl.handle.net/1765/10066 Publication: Verheul, Andrea et al (2008). Psychol Assessment, 20, 23-34

  5. Results confirmative factor analysis Website: http://hdl.handle.net/1765/10066

  6. Psychometric qualities final model • Good model fit among different populations: • Good internal consistency facets(median Cronbach’s  .77; range .69-.88) • Good test-retest reliability (median ICC .92; range .85-.95) Website: http://hdl.handle.net/1765/10066

  7. New results I:Validity studies

  8. Method: Study samples & Instruments SCL-90: Symptom Check List(Derogatis, 1983; Arrindell et al, 2003) CIP: Circumplex of Interpersonal Problems(Pederson, 2000) NEO-PI-R: NEO Personality Inventory-Revised(Costa & McCrae, 1992) DAPP: Dimensional Assessment of Personality Pathology(Livesley & Jackson, 2002)

  9. SIPP & Symptomatic distress (SCL) Overall median correlation: -0.28 Discriminative validity (partially) present

  10. Comparison with other personality measures (I): SIPP – NEO / CIP Higher correlations refer to plausible associations

  11. Comparison with other personality measures (II): SIPP – DAPP Overall median correlation: -0.36 Partially convergent, partially discriminative validity Verheul, Andrea et al (2008). Psychol Assessment, 20, 23-34

  12. Summary Validity Studies • Evidence for meaningful associations with other personality measurements (convergent validity) • Also evidence for lower associations with symptomatic measurements (discriminative validity)

  13. New results II:Sensitivity to change

  14. Method • Follow ups: 1 year and 3 years after start treatment

  15. SIPP domains at baseline and follow-ups Effect sizes: 0.73 & 1.02 Effect sizes: 0.95 & 1.17 Effect sizes: 0.57 & 0.69 Effect sizes: 0.18 & 0.58 Effect sizes: 0.18 & 0.40 More adaptive scores after treatment

  16. DiscussionValues of the SIPP Dimensional measurement core components personality pathologySelf-control, identity integration, relational capacities, social concordance, responsibility Promising psychometric resultsFactorial model, reliability, validity More adaptive scores after treatment

  17. Further research SIPP as outcome instrument in effectiveness studies Predictive validity: - Symptomatic improvement necessary for improvement on SIPP?- Improvement on SIPP necessary for functional improvement? SIPP part of studies DSM-V personality disorders workgroup

  18. Availability of the SIPP Diagnostic version: 118 items, 16 facets, 5 domainsOutcome version (SIPP-SF): 60 items, 5 domains Available in Dutch, English, Norwegian, Spanish and Italian In exchange for research data Websites: www.vispd.nl (click on heading sipp-main menu; five subpages) http://hdl.handle.net/1765/10066 Email: Helene.andrea@deviersprong.nl

More Related