1 / 5

Proportional range size

Arita et al. Figure 1. 1.0. 0.8. -0.12. 0.12. 0.6. Proportional range size. Proportional range size. -0.1. 0.1. -0.08. 0.4. 0.08. -0.06. 0.06. 0.04. -0.04. 0.2. 0.02. -0.02. 0.0. 0. 0.2. 0.4. 0.6. 0.8. 1. Proportional range diversity. Proportional range diversity.

tracey
Download Presentation

Proportional range size

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Arita et al. Figure 1 1.0 0.8 -0.12 0.12 0.6 Proportional range size Proportional range size -0.1 0.1 -0.08 0.4 0.08 -0.06 0.06 0.04 -0.04 0.2 0.02 -0.02 0.0 0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 Proportional range diversity Proportional range diversity

  2. Arita et al. Figure 2 (a) (b) Sites More diverse Species Widespread Proportional range size Proportional species diversity High avrg. range Low avrg. range Integrationist Segregationist Less diverse Restricted Proportional per-site range size Proportional range diversity

  3. Species Species Widespread Widespread Integrationist Integrationist Segregationist Segregationist Restricted Restricted Proportional range size Proportional range diversity Sites Sites More diverse More diverse High avrg. range High avrg. range Low avrg. range Low avrg. range Proportional species diversity Less diverse Less diverse Proportional per-site range size Arita et al. Figure 3 (a) (b) Proportional range size Proportional range diversity (c) (d) Proportional species diversity Proportional per-site range size

  4. Arita et al. Fig. 4 (a) (b) (c) (d) Proportional species richness Proportional range size (f) (e) Proportional range diversity Proportional per-site range

  5. Arita et al. Figure 5 (a) Proportional range size Proportional range diversity (b) Proportional species richness Proportional per-size range

More Related