310 likes | 320 Views
Explore cognitive aging through memory, attention, language, intelligence, and brain changes. Learn about micro and macro approaches. Discover the impact of perceptual deficits, memory concerns, and intelligence changes with age. Study various research designs and understand the influence of factors like inhibition, processing speed, and cognitive resources.
E N D
Cognitive Aging Based on Information in: Surprenant, A.M. & Neath, I. in Wilmoth & Ferraro, Gerontology: Perspectives & Issues
“…the entire person needs to be considered in order to develop a comprehensive theory of cognitive aging” (p. 89).
Cognitive Aging Includes: • Memory • Attention • Language • Intelligence • Brain changes • “everyday functioning in familiar environments”
Approaches to Studying Cognitive Aging • Micro (Experimental) • Macro (Psychometric) • Simulation Modeling
Micro (Experimental) Approaches • Focus: “…describing specific tasks & processes that differ as a fx of age. • Strategy: ID a subtask that can be timed; present it as a decision-making task and time the outcome. • Design: Experimental with Age as the independent variable & Time as the dependent variable
Macro (Psychometric) Approaches • Focus: “…a broad range of cognitive processing abilities that vary with age.” • Design: Correlation or Psychometric techniques. Goal: To identify commonalities—i.e., “…fundamental cognitive abilities” that differ with age.
Simulation Modeling: A recent middle ground approach • The Advantage: Better deals with the complexity of the effects of aging on cognition—many factors, multiples interactions among them.
Study Designs: Cross-sectional • “…the performance of a group of individuals from one age range is compared to that of a group from another age range.” • Easiest to do, but ignores uncontrolled covariates, e.g. cohort effects, motivation, health status
Study Designs: Longitudinal • Follows individuals over time, testing them repeatedly—e.g., The Nuns’ Study; HRS • “…allows researchers to estimate individual changes in particular abilities rather than inferring changes based on group differences • Very costly!!!
Meta-Analysis • “…a tool for combining results from multiple experiments…to determine the true size of an effect.”
Perceptual Deficits • “Both visual & Auditory processing abilities decline substantially as a fx of increasing age.” • Presbycusis-1/3 of 0ver-70 adults • Understanding speech in noise • “I can’t hear as fast as you talk.” • Light sensitivity; visual acuity; color vision; contrast sensitivity. • Possible Results: Limitation in activity & social function
Memory • A Matter of Great Concern; “…significant correlations between estimated memory ability and reports of depression.” • “Older adults perform worse than younger adults on memory tests in which there are few environmental cues.” Thus:….
Old people compared to younger-- • Worse on Recall tests; Equivalent on recognition • Worse on Explicit than Implicit tasks • Worse on tasks requiring active information manipulation and only slightly worse on measures of simple memory span
Prospective Memory—remembering to perform some action @ some future time • Types: Time-based tasks; Event-based tasks • Comparison: O.A. less well on time-based; no differences in event-based. • Generalization: “Environmental support” is important for maintaining max cog. Fx.
Primary Mental Abilities (PMA’s) • Mathematical reasoning • Word fluency and appropriate usage • Verbal meaning/vocabulary level • Inductive reasoning • Spatial relations • Verbal memory (ability to retain/recall info) • Perceptual speed
Types of Intelligence? • Fluid: “tasks that involve quick thinking, info manipulation, activities involving allocation and reallocation of attention—rely mainly on fluid intelligence. • E.g.: tests of memory, spatial relations, abstract & inductive reasoning, free recall, mental calculations
Crystallized: “tasks that tap well-learned stills, language, & retrieval of well-learned material rely more on crystallized intelligence. • E.g.: verbal meaning, word association, social judgement, number skills
Differences with aging? • Decreases—Fluid Intelligence • No Decreases (actually some increases)—Crystallized Intelligence (Salthouse, et al)
Explanation? Some Alternatives: • 1) Slowed processing speed • 2) Lack of inhibitory control • 3) Perceptual processing resources (working memory capacity) reduction • 4) Perceptual processing efficiency reduction
Slowed processing speed: • Usually measured by reaction times. • Salthouse argues that decreases in speed underlie most of the “age-related” declines in cog. Fxing. • If so, the question becomes: What causes the slowing?
Inhibition and Control: • In short, performance deficits are due to a difficulty in inhibiting irrelevant information—which leads to: • Increased interference & • Reduced processing resources.
“…the processing account (ala Craik, et al—mid 80’s) better explains the pattern of data found in research on cognitive aging” (p. 98) • The Structuralist Tradition vs. • The Processing Approach
Structuralist Tradition: • Purpose of the science of Psych: • to analyze & describe basic elements of cognition & • Discover how they work
Structuralist, cont’d • Development: a process of maturation of structures in childhood and • Deterioration in late adulthood • Concept: “a partitioning of cognition”.
The Processing Approach—Craik ‘86 • Argues in terms of PROCESSES rather than structures. • Interactional in nature. • Environment Environment @ encoding @ retrieval x x x x x x x The x x Individual
The combination of the person, the task, and the environment are all needed to explain age-related changes in memory.
Declining Sensory Abilities as a Fx of Aging • “ It is possible that speed in processing slows because basic input processes result in impoverished input that then take more time to identify and interpret.” • Causality? There is a ‘chicken & egg’ problem
Biological Aspects of the Aging Brain • Areas of the Aging Brain—smaller, but not uniformly so. • Most change in frontal lobe
Can We Improve Cognitive Abilities? • It’s a mixed bag. • Fitness level and cognitive Fx? A highly qualified “probably”. • P.M. Schwirian. 10/30/08