1 / 33

Empirical Constraints on Hadronization of Bulk Matter at RHIC

Empirical Constraints on Hadronization of Bulk Matter at RHIC. International Workshop on QCD and Experiments at RHIC August 9-14, 2004 Beijing, P.R. China Huan Zhong Huang University of California at Los Angeles. Outline. Formation of Dense Matter in Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions at RHIC

trent
Download Presentation

Empirical Constraints on Hadronization of Bulk Matter at RHIC

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Empirical Constraints on Hadronization of Bulk Matter at RHIC International Workshop on QCD and Experiments at RHIC August 9-14, 2004 Beijing, P.R. China Huan Zhong Huang University of California at Los Angeles

  2. Outline • Formation of Dense Matter in • Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions at RHIC • 2) Conventional Fragmentation Scheme Fails • 3) Nuclear Modification Factors RAA/RCP • and Azimuthal Angular Anisotropy v2 • 4) Features of RCP and v2 for Particle • Production at Intermediate pT • 5) Emerging Physical Scenario and Future • Experimental Verification

  3. Formation of High Energy Density Matter • Experimental Evidences • Suppression of high transverse momentum particles • and disappearance of back-to-back angular correlations •  energy loss while traversing the dense medium •  the energy loss also contributing to the production • of soft particles correlated with the high pT particle • -- Fuqiang Wang’s talk • 2) Hydrodynamic features in particle production • and azimuthal angular distributions •  high energy density in initial conditions !

  4. Why Not QGP Yet? High pT Phenomena – not directly sensitive to deconfinement though consistent with partonic state Hydrodynamical Behavior – not consistent with parton transport picture, failed to describe the space-time correlation (HBT) hadronization scheme dependent Confinement Signature ?

  5. Coupling Strength q q Shorter distance  q q q q (GeV) Momentum Transfer Salient Feature of Strong Interaction Asymptotic Freedom: Quark Confinement: 庄子天下篇 ~ 300 B.C. 一尺之棰,日取其半,万世不竭 Take half from a foot long stick each day, You will never exhaust it in million years. QCD Quark pairs can be produced from vacuum No free quark can be observed

  6. The Field & Feynman picture of cascade fragmentation Kretzer@ISMD04

  7. Too Many Baryons at Intermediate pT

  8. Baryon Production from pQCD e+e-jet fragmentation from SLD p p K K p p Normal Fragmentation Cannot Produce the Large Baryon Yield

  9. Number of Participants Impact Parameter Geometry of Nucleus-Nucleus Collisions Npart – No of participant nucleons Nbinary – No of binary nucleon-nucleon collisions cannot be directly measured at RHIC estimated from Woods-Saxon geometry

  10. Nuclear Modification Factors Use number of binary nucleon-nucleon collisions to gauge the colliding parton flux: N-binary Scaling  RAA or RCP = 1 simple superposition of independent nucleon-nucleon collisions !

  11. Particle Dependence of RCP suppression

  12. coordinate-space-anisotropy  momentum-space-anisotropy y py px x Initial/final conditions, dof, EOS Elliptic Flow Parameter v2

  13. STAR PHENIX Particle Dependence of v2 Baryon Meson Why saturation at intermediate pT ? Why baryon and meson difference ?

  14. STAR Preliminary Strange quark dynamics are not significantly different from light quarks

  15. Salient Features at Inermediate pT • Why so many baryons versus mesons? • Why does elliptic v2 versus pT saturate ? • Why Rcp and v2 in two groups: • Baryon and Meson ? • 4)Why strange quark similar to light u/d quarks ? Hadronization from bulk partonic matter – Constituent quark degrees of freedom Recombination/Coalescence scheme for hadron formation Surface emission

  16. Constituent Quark Degree of Freedom Hadronization Scheme for Bulk Partonic Matter: • KS – two quark coalescence • – three quark coalescence from the partonic matter surface?! Particle v2 may be related to quark matter anisotropy !! pT < 1 GeV/c may be affected by hydrodynamic flow ! Quark Coalescence – (ALCOR-J.Zimanyi et al, AMPT-Lin et al, Rafelski+Danos, Molnar+Voloshin …..) Quark Recombination – (R.J. Fries et al, R. Hwa et al)

  17. Volcanic mediate pT – Spatter (clumps) Quark Cluster Formation from Strongly Interacting Partonic Matter L X W Strangeness enhancement from QGP is most prominent in the region where particle formation from quark coalescence is dominant !

  18. Multi-Parton Dynamics for Bulk Matter Hadronization Essential difference: Traditional fragmentation  particle properties mostly determined by the leading quark ! Emerging picture from RHIC data (RAA/RCP and v2)  all constituent quarks are almost equally important in determining particle properties ! v2 of hadron comes from v2 of all constituent quarks ! Are constituent quarks the effective degrees of freedom for bulk partonic matter hadronization ? How do we establish signatures for multi-parton dynamics, recombination model for example, where thermal constituent quarks or shower partons from jet production are both possible ?

  19. Future Measurements of QCD Properties of Bulk Matter • Quantitative Energy Loss of light/heavy Quarks • Where does the Energy Loss Go? • Strange and Charm Quark Dynamics from Bulk Matter • Fluctuations, Phase Transition and Critical Point • Initial Temperature of the Partonic System and • Incoming Gluon Flux

  20. Heavy Quark in QCD Medium • Heavy Quark energy loss in color medium ! -- dead cone effect (less than light quarks) • Charm enhancement from high temperature gluonic matter (Tinit > 500 MeV)! An Intriguing Scenario ?! RAA 1.0 Open Charm Require direct open charm measurement ! Light hadrons PT (pT scale)

  21. Leading hadrons Medium STAR PRELIMINARY Energy Loss and Soft Particle Production Fuqiang Wang’s work

  22. A Critical Test for Recombination And Strange Quark Dynamics in Bulk Matter W f pT Scale !! STAR will make a measurement of W and f v2 from run-4 Au+Au data ! Duke Group, PLB 587, 73 (2004)

  23. Recombination  DS/D0 PYTHIA Prediction Charm quark recombines with a light (u,d,s) quark from a strangeness equilibrated partonic matter  DS/D0 ~ 0.4-0.5 at intermediate pT !!!

  24. pT Scales and Physical Processes RCP Three PT Regions: -- Fragmentation -- multi-parton dynamics (recombination or coalescence or …) -- Hydrodynamics (constituent quarks ? parton dynamics from gluons to constituent quarks? )

  25. Summary Formation of Dense Matter Partonic Degrees of Freedom Important Hadronization of Bulk Partonic Matter If So, the Dense Matter Must Be Deconfined Is It QGP?

  26. Potential exotic particles/phenomena: penta-quark states (uudds, uudds!) di-baryons H – (L-L, uuddss) [W-W] (ssssss) strange quark matter meta-stable Parity/CP odd vacuum bubbles disoriented chiral condensate …… Discoveries from Unexpected Areas?! RHIC -- Frontier for bulk partonic matter formation (quark clustering and rapid hadronization) -- Factory for exotic particles/phenomena

  27. The End

  28. Two Particle Jet-like Correlations Jet-like two particle correlations (e.g., trigger particle 4-6 GeV/c, associated particle 2-4 GeV/c) : These correlations cannot be easily explained in terms of recombination/coalescence scenario ! But 1) the effect of resonances on the two particle correlations has not be adequately addressed 2) trigger biases – with two high pT particles the initial parton is considerably harder than if only one high pT particle is produced. Fragmentation region pT > 5.5 GeV/c 3) low level two particle correlations in the soft region can be accommodated in recombination/coalescence (wave induced correlation?)

  29. The Melting of Quarks and Gluons-- Quark-Gluon Plasma -- Matter Compression: Vacuum Heating: Deconfinement High Temperature Vacuum -- high energy heavy ion collisions -- the Big Bang High Baryon Density -- low energy heavy ion collisions -- neutron starquark star

  30. Global Observables PRL 85, 3100 (00); 91, 052303 (03); 88, 22302 (02), 91, 052303 (03) 200 GeV 130 GeV PHOBOS 19.6 GeV Pseudo-rapidity Within |h|<0.5 the total transverse momentum created is 1.5x650x0.508 ~ 500 GeV from an initial transverse overlap area of pR2 ~ 153 fm2 ! hminus: Central Au+Au <pT>=0.508GeV/c pp: 0.390GeV/c Energy density e ~ 5-30 e0 at early time t=0.2-1 fm/c !

  31. Hydrodynamics Work at Low pT Thermostatistical model also describe the particle ratios well ! -- Another indication for constituent quark degrees of freedom?

  32. Charm and Bulk Matter Thermalization of partonic matter -- charm elliptic flow v2 ! -- charm hadron chemistry ! Does Charm Flow? Simulation by X. Dong Charm Meson v2 has to come from light quark v2 and possibly charm quark v2 !

  33. Recombination and Two-particle Jet-like Correlation Jet-like two particle correlations (e.g., trigger particle 4-6 GeV/c, associated particle 2-4 GeV/c) : These correlations cannot be easily explained in terms of recombination/coalescence scenario ! But 1) the effect of resonances on the two particle correlations has not be adequately addressed 2) trigger biases – with two high pT particles the initial parton is considerably harder than if only one high pT particle is produced. Fragmentation region pT > 5.5 GeV/c 3) low level two particle correlations in the soft region can be accommodated in recombination/coalescence (wave induced correlation?)

More Related